Published on
Associated Press

Yale Loses Court Case over Military Recruiters

John Christoffersen

NEW HAVEN, Connecticut -Yale Law School will end its policy of not working with military recruiters after a court ruling this week jeopardized about $300 million in federal funding, officials said Wednesday.

Yale and other universities have objected to the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which allows gay men and women to serve in the military only if they keep their sexual orientation to themselves.0920 08

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Yale on Monday, rejecting its argument that its right to academic freedom was infringed by a federal law that says universities must give the military the same access as other job recruiters or forfeit federal money.

"The fact is we have been forced under enormous pressure to acquiescence in a policy that we believe is deeply offensive and harmful to our students," said Robert Burt, a Yale law professor who was lead plaintiff in the case.

The funding loss would have devastated the university's medical research into cancer, heart disease and other illnesses, Burt said.

Yale Law School policy requires all recruiters to sign a nondiscrimination pledge, which the Pentagon has not done.

Jan Conroy, a Yale Law spokeswoman, said faculty had authorized the dean to waive the nondiscrimination pledge in 2002 when the military challenged it.

The pledge requirement will now be waived if military recruiters ask to participate in job fairs, Conroy said.

She said the U.S. Air Force has already asked to participate in a job interview program that starts Monday.


The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.

Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.

The law school had refused to assist military recruiters, denying them access to Web-based programs that link students and employers, Burt said.

The appeals court decision came after the Supreme Court ruled unanimously last year that the government can force colleges to open their campuses to military recruiters despite university objections. Justices rejected a free-speech challenge from law schools and professors who claimed they should not have to associate with military recruiters or promote their campus appearances.

The decision upheld a federal law that says universities must give the military the same access as other job recruiters or forfeit federal money.

In Connecticut, a federal judge ruled in 2005 that Yale Law School had a right to bar military recruiters from its job interview program. After the Supreme Court decision, the government appealed that ruling. That appeal led to Monday's 2nd Circuit ruling.

Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh said in a statement Wednesday that he was disappointed by the appeals court decision. Yale has an obligation to "ameliorate the impact" of discriminatory hiring practices, he said.

"We intend to meet this obligation and will work alongside our students to identify the best ways of doing so, in accordance with the law," Koh said. "We continue to look forward to the day when all members of our community will have an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."

The military's policy had put college leaders in a thorny situation because campus rules forbid participation of recruiters representing agencies or private companies that have discriminatory policies.

Defense officials argued that a federal law, the Solomon Amendment, requires Yale to allow recruiters on campus even without signing the pledge. Government lawyers have said blocking military recruiters makes it harder to hire huge teams of lawyers for issues related to operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

© 2007 The Associated Press

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article

More in: