EU Carbon Trading Scheme Failing to Curb Emissions from Big Polluters
BRUSSELS - Europe's big polluters pumped more climate-changing gases into the atmosphere in 2006 than during the previous year, according to figures that show the EU's carbon trading system failing to deliver curbs.
Critics said the data underlined the gap between the rhetoric of European leaders, who have promised to cut C02 emissions by one-fifth by 2020, and the reality of delivering reductions.
Yesterday's figures relate to the carbon produced in 22 nations by big industrial users that accounted for almost 93 per cent of emissions reported in 2005. The European Commission said that carbon output from these sources rose between 1-1.5 per cent in 2006 over the previous year. The statistics suggest the EU is still allocating too many carbon permits to enable the system to work properly.
The point of the trading scheme is to use the market to curb pollution by making firms buy extra credits if they emit too much CO2. But that discipline only applies if the cost of buying the right to pollute acts as a genuine incentive.
In 2005 the European Commission allowed member states to produce 3 per cent more C02 than they needed. In 2006, the difference between the ceiling and the emissions was closer to 1 per cent. That gap has closed partly because the amount of carbon produced rose. Only Denmark, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Britain gave businesses too few permits in 2006.
Barbara Helfferich, environment spokeswoman for the European Commission, said the scheme will prove effective during its second phase of life from 2008-12. She said: "There will be investment into more effective technologies and those companies that move earlier will have advantages."
But Chris Davies, environment spokesman for the Liberal Democrats in the European Parliament, said: "Getting the emissions trading system up and running has been a major achievement but without the proper caps we simply don't have an increase in carbon prices to bring an incentive to boost investment. Its future depends on ensuring the cap is tight but at the moment it is more like a sieve than a barrier".
Mahi Sideridou, EU climate policy director for Greenpeace, said: "The system is pointless if it doesn't deliver reductions. It is like Monopoly for emissions."
© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited