EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- US Is an Oligarchy Not a Democracy, says Scientific Study
- DOJ Investigation Confirms: Albuquerque Police 'Executing' Citizens
- What Do the Koch Brothers Really Want?
- Tutu: Climate Crisis Demands 'Anti-Apartheid-Style Boycott' of Fossil Fuel Industry
- Why US Fracking Companies Are Licking Their Lips Over Ukraine
Today's Top News
US Military Commanders Push for Ground Raids on Taliban in Pakistan
American military commanders are demanding ground raids on Pakistan's tribal areas in apparent frustration at Islamabad's failure to tackle militant safe havens across the border from Afghanistan, according to senior officers.
The plan has not yet been approved, they said, but could bring an intelligence windfall if they were allowed to launch cross-border attacks to capture insurgents inside Pakistan.
Pakistani and Nato officials denied any such proposals were being considered.
However, the demands reflect the frustration of commanders on the ground, whose soldiers are being killed by insurgents who can flee across the border at will.
Analysts also suggested it was an attempt to put pressure on Pakistan, America's awkward ally in the fight against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, to make good on promises to launch a fresh military offensive.
American officials said they were particularly keen to capture - rather than kill - militant leaders from the Taliban or the Haqqani network in order to obtain intelligence about future operations.
"We've never been as close as we are now to getting the go-ahead to go across," said a senior officer.
They also said an Afghan militia, backed by the CIA, had crossed into Pakistan in pursuit of militants on at least two occasions since 2008.
Details of America's secret war in Pakistan - carried out with the support of the government in Islamabad - have leaked out in recent weeks, with diplomatic cables revealing how US special forces had fought alongside Pakistani troops.
Cross-border collaboration is desperately sensitive for the government of Pakistan, which fears a violent backlash from Islamic hardliners if it is seen to bow to American pressure.
Hussain Haqqani, Pakistan's ambassador to Washington, said the country's armed forces were capable of tackling the threat from militants.
"We work with our allies, especially the US, and appreciate their material support but will not accept foreign troops," he wrote on the microblogging site Twitter.
The US has issued repeated requests for Pakistan to take on militant havens in North Waziristan, from where fighters have launched attacks on international troops in Afghanistan. The region is also home to terrorist training camps, where recruits are believed to have plotted attacks on Europe.
However, Pakistan has so far refused to set a date for a military operation.
With Washington keen to start withdrawing some US troops from Afghanistan next July, military and political leaders point to a renewed sense of urgency.
And last week, President Obama's war review identified tackling Pakistan's havens as crucial to progress in Afghanistan.
Several analysts suggested the leak was designed to pressure Pakistan to take tougher action before the US took matters into their own hands.
"This is a deliberate leak," said Ahmed Rashid, an expert on the Afghan Taliban. "The Americans have been talking about this for the last six months." Talat Masood, a retired Army general, said it would be very difficult for Pakistan to allow US forces on to its soil despite close co-operation.
"They are coordinating, sharing intelligence on drone targets, but allowing troops in would be crossing a red line," he said.
A spokesman for the Nato-led force in Afghanistan rubbished the idea, saying it enjoyed a strong working relationship with Pakistan.
"This co-ordination recognises the sovereignty of Afghanistan and Pakistan to pursue insurgents and terrorists operating in their respective border areas," said Rear Admiral Gregory Smith.