Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives
   Featured Views  

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
A World of Difference in Power that Shuns Brawn for Supremacy
Published on Tuesday, March 13, 2007 by the News-Journal (Daytona Beach, Fla.)
A World of Difference in Power that Shuns Brawn for Supremacy
by Pierre Tristam

Browsing through a used bookstore the other day I picked up one of those old National Geographic issues with the pictures of doffed and frolicking natives. Except that the natives inside weren't the bouncy kind from Bali or Burundi but from countries we've come to know as breeders of anti-Americanism or out-and-out enmity: France, Spain, Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, the kind of places where, if President Bush were to venture -- as he has been venturing through Latin America -- he'd be burned in effigy and local authorities would have to mobilize the equivalent of two military brigades to protect him. Colombia, the third-biggest recipient of American aid in the last decade and supposedly its greatest ally south of the Rio Grande, had to do just that for a Bush stop-over lasting a few hours on Sunday.

But the Geographic was dated May 1960. The 63 pages featuring all those countries fell under the banner of a single article entitled, "When the President Goes Abroad." And in every country, in almost every picture, Dwight Eisenhower's presence was cause for delirious celebration. It didn't matter where: Madrid, Kabul, Tehran, even Karachi, that now-seething Pakistani sweatshop of hatred for America. "From his open car," the Geographic wrote of a stop in Karachi, Eisenhower "waved to cheering Pathan tribesmen wearing baggy white trousers, long-tailed white shirts, and faded turbans." The car he traveled in was an open horse-drawn-carriage, slow and shadeless. Can you imagine Bush traveling in an open car anywhere anymore?

In Kabul, the then-Soviet-backed regime streaked its Soviet-built MIGs "across blue skies and swooped on a United States jet transport crossing the border" in welcome. If MIGs (or even F-16s) tried that on a presidential transport anywhere these days, they'd be smoke and dust. In Delhi, "a sea of hands salutes a peaceful sahib." The "human flood" that greeted Eisenhower at Delhi's Ram Lila Grounds, "undoubtedly the greatest mass of people President Eisenhower has ever seen in one place at the same time," was larger than the crowds that had attracted Mahatma Gandhi or Prime Minister Nehru there. In Tehran, Eisenhower's car traveled on a road literally carpeted with Persian rugs. In Ankara, Turkey, 400,000 greeted him and were amazed to hear that "Ike even speaks Turkish." (Sometimes it's hard to say that Bush speaks English.)

And so it went on every stop of Eisenhower's 19-day, 22,000-mile "Flight to Peace" mission through Asia, Europe and North Africa on Dec. 3-22, 1959. It's not as if the world was a perfectly peaceful place then. The Cold War may not have been in an ice age. It was frigid nonetheless. America was projecting power and brawn then as now, but with purposes way beyond power and brawn for supremacy's sake. In those pre-Vietnam days, the world loved America because it led by example and cooperation first, cudgel last.

That very opportunity existed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, even in the Islamic world. Bush didn't just squander it. He trashed it, demolished American prestige and respect for a generation to come, and did so not by stupidity alone, but with in-your-face pride. His remaining supporters boast the same sense of supremacy fueled by missionary zealotry: Every anti-American protest is to them proof that America is on a virtuous mission. But there's nothing virtuous in these realities. The 2006 University of Maryland/Zogby International Annual Arab Public Opinion Survey found that while Osama bin Laden has no more than a 1 or 2 percent approval rating even in his native Saudi Arabia, Arabs were unequivocal about whom they disliked most: Bush was the outright winner (38 percent). The biggest irony is that while Jordan had the biggest Bush-disapproval rating of all Arab nations at 57 percent, it was still below Bush's 63 percent disapproval by Americans in the most recent Gallup poll.

The last article in that 1960 Geographic was a brief one on Brasilia, the new capital of Brazil then under construction. Eisenhower is pictured in that one, too, receiving a gold key to the city from the Brazilian president as busloads of schoolgirls wave "We Like Ike" pennants. When Bush was in Brazil last week, the pictures were of protesters smashed and cuffed by riot police. Ike wouldn't recognize the world remade in Bush's distorted image. But who among us with a memory as fresh as the 1990s does?

Tristam is a News-Journal editorial writer. Reach him at or through his personal Web site at .

2007 News-Journal Corporation 


Discuss This Article
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.
Independent, non-profit newscenter since 1997.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.