Two phone calls this
week, one from a liberal magazine, and one from an organization
representing female executives, were asking questions about two sides of
the same issue: “Best” lists for working women. You know the ones “100
Best Companies for Working Mothers,” “Fifty Best Places for Latinas to
Work,” “Best Companies for Diversity,” and so on. The magazine wanted
to know if the lists are of any use to working women at all, or if in
fact they do harm. The female executives wanted to alert me that
Wal-Mart, though facing the largest sex discrimination lawsuit in
history, made their top 30. Their question was whether a company can be
good for exec women and lousy for say, cashiers.
It is not only
possible, but it may be usual, for a company to be better for women at
the top than those at the bottom. That’s also true for men. You see
plenty of grayhairs in gray suits, riding around in chauffeured limos
driven by other guys who make little more than the minimum wage, often
with meager benefits to boot. The difference is there are still a lot
more men than women in those backseats reading the Wall Street Journal
and figuring out how to bust the unions.
The bigger question
is whether the companies that show up on these lists are worthy of
admiration at all. An example I like to use is a school. Suppose your
kid’s school was named one of the “Top 100 in the U.S.” by two
different scholastic magazines. You’d be pretty proud, wouldn’t you?
Now suppose you learn that the first magazine allowed the schools to
rate themselves by sending in descriptions of programs, and they didn’t
have to provide data on student performance. The second magazine did
its own rating, but digging a little deeper you find the actual report
cards of the students in the ranked schools are abysmal. The top school
comes in with average student grades of 28%, and the lowest rates a
miserable 11% average. Furthermore, the school pays a Vice Principal a
full time salary just to fill out forms, buy advertising, and underwrite
the magazines’ award ceremony so the school can make the list in the
first place. Still impressed? More likely you’d be outraged.
This scenario happens
every day in corporate America. Diversity Manager is the usual title of
our theoretical Vice Principal, and she or he has a big budget to throw
around so the company makes the list. The company buys advertising in
the magazine giving the award (or makes an outright donation if it’s an
organization with no magazine), and gets to brag about it. Most are
Fortune 500 firms where women are stuck at the bottom, and many are
defending themselves in court for sex discrimination (or have paid huge
settlements) -- some in the same years they get the awards.
This stuff is far
from benign. I took a look at some publicly available court papers in a
sex discrimination filed against the giant consulting company, Deloitte
and Touche, and talked to some women in the company. One told me the
company recruiter had touted their “awards” and “Best” listings
repeatedly. Once on board, she realized women never seemed to get
promoted, and were systematically winnowed out as time passed. It gets
worse. When another woman sued for sex discrimination, Deloitte tried
to get the judge to throw the case out – strictly on the grounds that it
had made the “100 Best Companies for Working Mothers,” published by
Working Mother Magazine. The female judge said no dice – but who knows
what a good-ol’-boy on the bench would have done.
The lesson is simple.
Women should be extremely wary of what they read about “good” companies
if the information is put out by any organization that stands to
profit. And yes, lists can do harm. Just ask the woman who left a good
job to go to what she thought was a better one at one of these firms,
only to have to sue for pregnancy discrimination two years later. It
did happen, it does happen, and “Best” lists only make the problem
worse.
Martha Burk is the author of Cult of Power: Sex Discrimination in Corporate America and What Can Be Done About It, just out from Scribner. Director, Corporate Accountability Project, National Council of Women’s Organizations. www.womensorganizations.org.
Copyright 2007 Minutemanmedia.org
###
Printer Friendly Version
E-Mail This Article
