"Advice to Retirees: Embrace the future," syndicated columnist Tad Bartimus recently wrote in my local Seattle paper. Sounds good,
but for Bartimus the future was a layoff, in a corporate cutback, from a 25-year career at the Associated Press news service. Faced
with the Hobson's choice of agreeing to it or losing all health care access and pension benefits, she suddenly had to find ways to
reinvent herself and survive, with less than half of her previously promised pension. She explores how her situation echoes the
predicament of more and more Americans, like those who took middle-class futures for granted at companies such as General Motors,
Delta Airlines, and Ford, but who now scramble to get by at jobs paying a fraction of the wages they were used to. America's social
contract is being ripped apart, she writes-then she backs off to counsel individual adaptation and seeing life as "a banquet," where
we need to savor even the unexpected courses.
I know lots of people like Bartimus's friend Sue. Sue worked for United Airlines for 23 years, lost her savings when the company's
stock crashed, may lose her pension in the current bankruptcy, and has to supplement her now part-time wages with a second job
cleaning houses. I recently spoke in Kokomo, Indiana, where a major Delphi plant is likely to be closed, devastating a once-secure
community of decent blue-collar jobs. My brother-in-law, now eking out a living as a substitute teacher, has been out of full time
work for almost a decade now, in part because of a heart condition which would saddle any but the largest employers with
prohibitively unaffordable insurance costs. Everywhere I go, I encounter people with once-comfortable lives who are borrowing on
their houses, running up their credit cards, losing their health insurance, and generally running faster and faster to avoid the
Bartimus highlights a real and urgent problem. The promises on which many of us have based our entire economic lives are no longer
being honored. We're increasingly a winner-take-all society, where those at the top gorge on luxury consumption to an extent that
makes the Robber Barons look like paupers, while those at the bottom scramble for crumbs. But the solutions Bartimus counsels are
exclusively individual. "The trick," she writes, "it so figure out what comes next," and to focus "on possibilities, not regrets."
Maybe, she writes, she'll forge a new future in woodworking, or open a gardening shop.
I hope Bartimus keeps landing on her feet, and I bet that she will. Of course people should, like her, be optimistic and muster all
their resourcefulness, creativity, and tenacity to deal with the cards they're dealt. But we should also work together to help
insure a future where everyone gets dealt a decent hand.
The problems Bartimus describes can't be solved by quietly accepting the global corporate mantra: "It's here. It's the future. Get
used to it." It's not our individual decisions that are gutting our pensions, raising medical costs sky high, and making our lives
on this rich and fruitful earth increasingly precarious. The economic squeeze faced by everyone except a handful of individuals at
the top comes from thirty years of deliberate political choices--union-busting, regressive tax and trade policies, an eroding
minimum wage, and a collapse of moral and political restraints on destructive greed. These pressures have been accelerated vastly
since Bush took office. Think of the moral obscenity of funding the rebuilding of New Orleans by cutting food stamps, Medicaid, and
low-income energy assistance. They'll only be reversed by common effort.
I worry that by framing the solution totally in terms of individual adaptation, Bartimus steers her readers away from the major
lesson of the stories she tells: that ordinary citizens must join together and speak out on the larger roots of these problems, on
the choices we're allowing to be made in our common name. If we simply buckle down and accept our fate, some of us will indeed find
ways to adapt and survive, but many more will fall through the cracks. In a time when we're taking The Apprentice as a national
model, we need less silent adaptation, not more. Life should indeed be a banquet-for all of us. Whether we make it so is contingent
on our common actions, not just how well we handle our individual challenges.
Paul Rogat Loeb is the author of The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear, named the #3 political book of fall 2004 by the History Channel and the American Book Association, and of Soul of a Citizen: Living With Conviction in a Cynical Time. See www.paulloeb.org To receive his monthly articles email firstname.lastname@example.org with the subject line: subscribe paulloeb-articles.