Over the past few months, I’ve gotten all kinds of flak from CEOs who
were the subject of a report I co-authored about executive pay among
defense contractors. Jack London of CACI International, whose employees
interrogated prisoners at Abu Ghraib, denounced what I wrote as
“shameful” and “ignorant.” A United Technologies official accused me
(falsely) of slander.
But the man who got the worst skewering was silent. David H. Brooks, CEO
of bulletproof vest maker DHB Industries, earned $70 million in 2004,
13,349 percent more than his pre-9/11 compensation, according to
“Executive Excess,” co-published by the Institute for Policy Studies and
United for a Fair Economy. On top of that, Brooks sold company stock
worth about $186 million last year, spooking investors who drove DHB’s
share price from more than $22 to as low as $6.50.
Shareholders were mighty ticked, but what makes Brooks’ $250 million in
war windfalls particularly obscene is that the equipment which boosted
his fortunes appears not to work very well. In May 2005, the US Marines
recalled more than 5,000 DHB armored vests after questions were raised
about their effectiveness in stopping 9 mm bullets. In November, the
Marines and Army announced a recall of an additional 18,000 DHB vests.
Hearing nothing from DHB’s PR team in response to media coverage of the
report, I thought Mr. Brooks might be cowering in shame. Instead, I now
find out that he was busy planning a party. And not just any party.
The New York Daily News estimates that the bat mitzvah Brooks threw for
his daughter over the weekend cost an estimated $10 million. Virtually
every musician that you might guess would appeal to a 50-something Long
Island CEO was flown in by private jet: Aerosmith, Tom Petty, the
Eagles' Don Henley and Joe Walsh, who performed with Fleetwood Mac's
Stevie Nicks, Kenny G. As a likely concession to his daughter's tastes,
Brooks also booked 50 Cent, DJ AM (Nicole Richie's fiancée) and rap diva
Ciara.
According to Daily News gossip columnist Lloyd Grove, Brooks was so
pumped for Aerosmith that he changed his wardrobe for their performance
from a “black-leather, metal-studded suit -- accessorized with
biker-chic necklace chains and diamonds from Chrome Hearts jewelers --
into a hot-pink suede version of the same lovely outfit.” The CEO then
reportedly mounted the stage, clowned with Steven Tyler and insisted
that his teenage nephew be permitted to sit in on drums.
Gallivanting with celebrities no doubt does wonders to relieve the mind
of unpleasant matters. And Brooks has plenty to ponder. Under
investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission for financial
wrongdoing, he also faces a number of investor class action lawsuits for
fraud and insider trading. On top of the Marine recall, DHB had to
settle a lawsuit in April with the New York Police Department and the
Southern States Police Benevolent Association by replacing an estimated
2,609 potentially defective pieces of body armor. DHB stock, already in
the tank, has slumped even further, to about $4.
Grotesque as it may be, Brooks' blowout is merely one of the more
visible symbols of rampant war profiteering in the post-9/11 era. Our
study showed that defense contractor CEOs received raises on average of
200 percent between 2001 and 2004, compared to only 7 percent for
average large company CEOS.
Compared to the pay of those on the frontlines of the war, the gap has
grown even faster. The ratio between defense CEO pay and that of a
military general has doubled during this period, from 12-to-1 to
23-to-1. The defense CEOs make 160 times the pay of an army private in
combat.
Americans haven’t always been so blasé about war profiteering. President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt famously said: "I don't want to see a single
war millionaire created in the United States as a result of this world
disaster.”
FDR’s strong feelings about war profiteering were shared by his
successor, Harry Truman. As a Senator, Truman had traveled around the
country going from one defense industry factory to another to
investigate charges that executives were reaping unfair rewards. He
later formed an investigative committee that saved billions in military
costs. Imagine if Truman and FDR were alive today what they might have
to say about Brooks’ extravaganza.
Two and a half years into this war, the costs are painfully clear. The
U.S. death toll alone is more than 2,000 and rising fast. The bill for
taxpayers is more than $200 billion and growing. The damage to
Americans’ image in the world is immeasurable. But one man has had a
helluva party.
Sarah Anderson is a Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies and the co-author of Field Guide to the Global Economy (New Press, 2005) and Executive Excess.
###