Where do American religious leaders stand on torture? Their deafening
silence evokes memories of the unconscionable behavior of German church leaders
in the 1930s and early 1940s.
Despite the hate whipped up by administration propagandists against those it
brands "terrorists," most Americans agree that torture should not
be permitted. Few seem aware, though, that although President George W.
Bush says he is against torture, he has openly declared that our military and
other interrogators may engage in torture "consistent with military
necessity."
For far too long we have been acting like "obedient Germans."
Shall we continue to avert our eyes - even as our mainstream media begin to
expose the "routine" torture conducted by US forces in Iraq, Afghanistan,
and Guantanamo?
Senate Armed Forces Committee Chairman, John Warner took a strong rhetorical
stand against torture early last year after seeing the photos from Abu
Graib. Then he succumbed to strong political pressure to postpone Senate
hearings on the subject until after the November 2004 election. Those of
us who live in Virginia
might probe our consciences on this. Shall we citizens of the once-proud
Old Dominion simply acquiesce while Sen. Warner shirks his constitutional duty?
We have come a long way since Virginia patriot
Patrick Henry loudly insisted that the rack and the screw were barbaric
practices that must be left behind in the Old World,
"or we are lost and undone." Can Americans from other states
consult their own consciences with respect to what Justice may require of them
in denouncing torture as passionately as the patriots who founded our nation?
On September 24, The New York Times
ran a detailed report regarding the kinds of "routine" torture that
US servicemen and women have been ordered to carry out (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/24/politics/24abuse.html).
This week's Time also has
an article on the use of torture by US forces in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and Guantanamo.
Those two articles are based on a new report from Human Rights Watch, a report
that relies heavily on the testimony of a West Point
graduate, an Army Captain who has had the courage to speak out. A
Pentagon spokesman has dismissed the report as "another predictable
report by an organization trying to advance an agenda through the use of
distortion and errors of fact." Judge for yourselves; the report
can be found at (http://hrw.org/reports/2005/us0905/). Grim but
required reading.
Inhuman
History, even recent history, demonstrates once again that total
power corrupts totally. See if you can guess the author of the following:
"In this land that has inherited
through our forebears the noblest understandings of the rule of law, our
government has deliberately chosen the way of barbarism...
There is a price to be paid for the right to be called a civilized
nation. That price can be paid in only one currency - the currency of
human rights...When this currency is devalued a nation chooses the company of
the world's dictatorships and banana republics. I indict this
government for the crime of taking us into that shady fellowship.
The rule of law says that cruel and inhuman
punishment is beneath the dignity of a civilized state. But to prisoners
we say, 'We will hold you where no one can hear your
screams.' When I used the word 'barbarism,' this is
what I meant. The entire policy stands condemned by the methods used to
pursue it.
We send a message to the jailers, interrogators, and those who make such
practices possible and permissible: 'Power is a fleeting thing. One
day your souls will be required of you."'"
-- Bishop Peter Storey, Central Methodist Mission, Johannesburg, June 1981
I asked a Muslim friend recently what the Koran says about torture. After
consulting an imam, she reported that the Koran does not address the subject
because the Koran deals only "with human behavior." Do not we
of the Judeo-Christian tradition also reject torture as inhuman and never morally permissible?
The various rationalizations for torture do not bear close scrutiny.
Intelligence specialists concede that the information acquired by torture
cannot be considered reliable. Our own troops are brutalized when they
follow orders to brutalize. And they are exposed to much greater risk
when captured. Our country becomes a pariah among nations. Above
all, torture is simply wrong. It falls into the same category of evil as
slavery and rape. Torture is inhuman and
immoral, whether or not our bishops and rabbis can summon the courage to name
it so.
It Is Up To Us
By keeping their tongue-tied heads way down, our religious
leaders have forfeited the moral authority with which they otherwise could
speak. They end up playing the role of Hitler's Reichsbishops, who
supported - or at least acquiesced in - the policies and methods of the
Third Reich.
Many American men and women - Jews, Christians, Muslims of Abrahamic
tradition - have learned not to depend on clergy leaders who bless the
Empire. The inescapable conclusion is, as popular theologian Annie
Dillard reminds us, "There is only us; there never has been any
other."
The question is this: Are we are up to the challenge of confronting the
evil of torture, or shall we prove Patrick Henry right? Is our country
about to be "lost and undone?"
Ray McGovern works for Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical
Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. He is co-founder of Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity and lives in Virginia.
###