Now that I am back in Montana, I
have some time to reflect on my trip to DC this week. I was really
impressed with a lot of the people I met with - there seems to be an awakening
among progressives there that we're at rock bottom, and we need to fundamentally
rethink how we are going to move forward and start winning again. That said,
when I read an article in yesterday's Cleveland Plain Dealer, I realize just how
far a journey we have in front of us in making the Democratic Party return to
its roots - and to its prominence. The story is about the Democratic
Leadership Council (DLC) holding a three-day conference in Ohio about how to
reverse conservatives' gains - and Democrats 2008 presidential contenders
are flocking to it, as if the DLC has been a beacon of electoral success over
the years (see more on that myth below). The story quotes the DLC's
ultimate Beltway insider Bruce Reed saying "If Democrats can't win in Ohio, we
don't deserve to win the presidency." That's a true statement. But it's
ironic coming from the head of the DLC, a group that
has ardently pushed the very "free" trade policy that has destroyed Ohio's job
base, and has pushed that policy at exactly the right time to stab the
Democratic Party in the back.
As USA Today reported during the
campaign, trade is one of the most important issues in Ohio. And yet the Beltway
insiders from the DLC - the very people who have used corporate money to buy
Democratic support in Congress for "free" trade - is arrogantly coming into Ohio
to tell Democrats there the way to win is to support their agenda. This is the kind of arrogance and lunacy that could only come from
Washington, D.C.'s corporate money circles - it is totally divorced from
political reality, yet these well-heeled clowns over at the DLC still claim they
have a model of success. It will be interesting to see if, just
as the DLC viciously attacked Howard Dean, the DLC will try to make life harder
for people like Ohio's popular Congressman Sherrod Brown (D), should he jump
into the state's U.S. Senate race in 2006. Brown has been a leader in pushing
for fair trade, and in whipping up opposition to CAFTA – an opposition the DLC
tried to undercut last week.
What's most funny/sad about this, is
that these same DLC leaders told the Christian Science Monitor that they are
worried that "voters know too little about what their own party stands for" -
and yet absolve themselves from any blame for that. There is no awareness that when Democrats rhetorically claim to be
standing up for the middle class, and then vote the DLC's way on fundamental
economic issues, the public catches on and understands they are being
misled.
The DLC also tells the Monitor that
"If Democrats are smart, they also will avoid copying Rove's strategy of
polarization, using controversial issues to whip up support from a loyal base of
voters." How, may I ask, is that "smart?" Last I checked, Karl Rove has won
almost every political campaign he's been involved in with that strategy, and
now Republicans dominate every branch of government. How is it "smart" not to
take some tactical lessons from him? I'm not saying we take our ethics lessons
from Rove - but to say that he hasn't been politically successful in winning
elections is beyond tone deaf: it's just plain stupid.
Maybe if I put it in corporate terms
that the DLCers could understand, it would be more clear. Going to places like
Ohio to tell Democrats to continue pushing the DLC's corporate "free" trade
policies would be like being the guy who ran a company into the ground, showing
up to give a presentation to the company's board, and telling the board that the
company should keep doing exactly what its been doing, even it if means complete
bankruptcy. The fact is, if you did that, you'd be fired. But in Democratic
Party politics, these people aren't fired - they are venerated, as if they have
the keys to success. And then we wonder why Democrats continue to lose, and
lose, and lose, and lose. What's really amazing is that these professional
election losers still can spew their drivel with a straight face.
DLC CEO Al From told the Monitor
that there is "a lot of concerns in this country about the way Washington is run
and about the arrogance of power in Washington." The
same could be said about how the Democratic Party is still influenced by From
and his corporate cronies, and about the arrogance of the DLC's corporate-cash
power that continues to try to drive the Democratic Party into the
ground.
Sources:
DLC to preach "free" trade agenda in Ohio, a state ravaged by "free" trade:
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1121938334222852.xml&coll=2
The effects on Ohio of "free" trade:
http://www.policymattersohio.org/trade.htm
DLC stabs Dems in the back by supporting Bush's CAFTA:
http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=1C148B00-B99A-67B4-D0CEE576298A99FE
USA Today about the emergence of trade as an issue in Ohio elections:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-03-14-kerry-nafta_x.htm
How the DLC has used corporate money to try to buy the Democratic Party:
http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/7/dreyfuss-r.html
DLC attacked Howard Dean:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0304-27.htm
Christian Science Monitor on the DLC:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0720/p04s01-usmb.html
© 2005 Working Assets
###