If you play poker you've probably met the guy who
believes he's the expert gambler. His confident
posture and smug facial expressions suggest he's heard
Kenny Roger's "The Gambler" but never got the message,
because he seems genuinely shocked when his bluff is
called and he loses his chips.
The war hawks who orchestrated the invasion of Iraq
are that type of gambler, and they're willing to bet
everything on their gamble in the Middle East. This
could put the US peace movement in a stronger
position, should it unify and adopt an effective
nonviolent strategy to end our illegal occupation of
Iraq (see my article "Getting Out Of Iraq: A Letter to
the US Peace Movement" at http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1214-31.htm).
Last week it was reported that the Army National Guard
seeks to give active duty soldiers who join the guard
$15,000 bonuses - an increase from the current $50.
The Army Reserve is also boosting its reenlistment
bonuses, according to Military.com.
It was also reported last week that the Army wants to
increase its ranks by 30,000 new slots. This doesn't
account for the current members whose contracts were involuntarily extended, or the retirees and officers called back to active duty. The Project for a New American Century, the neoconservative group that paved the way to invading Iraq, has called for 25,000 additional army personnel per year for several years.
A few days ago came news about the "Bush
administration proposal to boost payments to families
of US troops killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and future
war zones" from just over $12,000 to $250,000 (AP). Congressional Democrats want to extend this benefit to "all service members on active military duty" (while avoiding debate about the meaning of "future war zones").
While few would argue that most military members and
their families deserve more dignified pay and
benefits, the question is why now?
Plausibly, shortfalls in recruiting, retention
problems, desertions, public refusals by service
members to serve in Iraq, a rise in conscientious
objection, and the outspoken opposition of military
families to the war in Iraq, caused these moves.
Instead of sensibly withdrawing from Iraq and healing
military morale, however, the war hawks prefer to
spend more money and expend more military force in
their quest to conquer Iraq. Never mind that they've
already failed, and never mind the damage done to Iraq
or America's relationship with the world.
The US faces yearly deficits of about $450 billion,
annual reported Pentagon budgets topping $400 billion,
a trade deficit nearing $500 billion, and a national
debt of almost $8 trillion. We can't afford to write
endless checks for illegal and unnecessary wars.
Foreign investors are quietly losing confidence in the
US and are turning to Europe and Asia, while the
domestic economy is floating on a sea of consumer debt
and a real estate bubble sustained by low interest
rates.
Something has to give, and the war hawks managing the occupation of Iraq are betting that more money tossed in the military pot will allow them to outlast everyone else at the table. They're betting that the Iraqi resistance - and the peace movement - will fold before the financial house of cards comes down.
However, the reality in Iraq shows how weak their hand
is. The Iraqi election is to democracy what one-night
stands are to love, the heavy-handed occupation of
Iraq continues to breed widespread resistance, and
even some US corporations are abandoning contracts in
Iraq. The reality in the US is a country at war with
itself, a nation of diminished liberty and creeping
fascism, and a government following the playbook used
by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
The most prevalent criticism of my article "Getting
Out Of Iraq: A Letter to the US Peace Movement" was
that it didn't address the issue of military funding.
The recent efforts of the military and the Bush
administration to boost recruitment and retention
indicate that persuading men and women to avoid
military service could effectively address that
criticism.
If the US peace movement organizes to peacefully
reduce the number of military personnel who serve in
support of the Iraqi occupation, financial incentives
will have to increase to sustain the occupation. As
the financial health of the US subsequently declines,
America will eventually reach a "tipping point" where
the People and the Congress demand an immediate
withdrawal from Iraq.
Mike Kress is an Air Force veteran (87-94) who served
in the Persian Gulf (Operation Southern Watch) before
leaving the military as a conscientious objector. He
is the vice chair of the Spokane Human Rights
Commission and is an active volunteer with the Peace
and Justice Action League of Spokane (www.pjals.org).
Email at shrcmike@yahoo.com.
###