"The master class has always declared the wars;
the subject class has always fought the battles...."
- Eugene Debs
Almost two years after our invasion of Iraq - an occasion that was to be
'a piece
of cake,' one that would be celebrated by Iraqis strewing flowers before
our troops - it is
well past the point when we should recognize that the Iraq War has
become the Vietnam
of the 21st Century. As in Vietnam, The Mexican War, the Spanish
American War, the
pretext for going to war was manufactured by misrepresenting facts and
whipping up
public fury, usually a simple task when that well known toxin -
patriotism - is in the air.
Many years ago Rudyard Kipling wrote in his Epitaphs of the War:
'If any question why we died,
Tell them, because our fathers lied.'
At the same time, one of England's most promising poets of WWI, Wilfred Owen, wrote a famous anti-war poem. After presenting a series of ghastly
images
relating to the death of a soldier by mustard gas, Owen tells us that if
we could witness
such scenes, then
'My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
to children ardent for some desperate glory.
The old lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro Patria Mori.'
For those of us without an Oxford education, the translation of the Latin
is, "It is
sweet and fitting that you should die for your country."
President Bush and his minions are not unique in riding to war on the
back of lies.
Presidents Polk, McKinley, and Johnson, among others, were equally
guilty. In each
case, these presidents embarked on wars that were based not on
self-defense but naked
aggression and a desire to expropriate what belonged rightfully to
others. To mask such
pillaging, it is always accompanied by an appeal to nationalism and
soaring flights of
rhetoric. With Iraq, President Bush kept inventing new rationales for
the invasion, all of
them evoking some noble purpose. And in his second inaugural speech just
delivered,
more of the same was dished up supposedly in the service of liberty and
justice for all of
the world's citizens. Of this tactic, columnist Molly Ivins would say,
"It's like putting
lipstick on a pig."
While the President can endlessly resort to Pollyanna summaries of the "catastrophic success" of our engagement in Iraq, the truth puts the lie
to all of these
fictions.
On our side, there have been 1,417 Americans killed in this debacle, with thousands more grievously wounded, many of those facing severely
diminished lives
from this time on. The cost of the war, according to the ticking meter
on the internet, is
$152 billion dollars, with another $80 billion requested for the
immediate future. Since
there is no end to the war in sight, there will be no end of the
hemorrhaging treasure to
support it. And all of this coincides with staggering budget and trade
deficits, a
disappearing middle class as jobs are exported to other countries,
growing poverty, and a
flow of world investment to the Euro as more and more creditors lose
confidence in the
American dollar. Add to that the insidious erosion of liberties under
the Patriot Act. But
most distressing is our apparent willingness at the highest levels of
government to
condone torture as a means of gaining intelligence. With such a
departure from
international norms, it is not difficult to see that in fighting our
"barbaric" enemies, we
become more like them with every passing week.
On the other side - yes, there is another side, although from coverage
in American
media, you would scarcely realize it - it is estimated that 100,000
Iraqis have been killed
and far more than that made homeless, jobless, and futureless. Two years
after 'Mission
Accomplished' the country has descended into unspeakable chaos. In Baghdad, electricity is available only part of the day, clean water is scarce,
sewage floods the
streets. Fallujah has been reduced to rubble, turning about 100,000
civilians into
refugees. The coming election will be meaningless, since violence has
forced candidates
to remain anonymous, and the act of voting itself is the equivalent of
playing Russian
Roulette. An assured electoral victory by the Shiite majority is an
invitation to civil war,
which will make the current misery in that hapless country seem pale by
comparison. All
the happy talk by the Bush administration does not change these facts.
The Washington
wrecking crew has created its own tsunami and all of us (Americans and
Iraqis) are
paying the price of their imperial ambitions.
In Dwight Eisenhower's final speech to the nation in 1953, he warned us
of the
power of the military-industrial complex:
'Every gun that is made, every
warship
launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from
those who hunger
and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. The world in arms
is not spending
money alone. It is spending the sweat of laborers, the genius of its
scientists, the hopes of
its children....This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense.
Under the cloud of
threatening war, it is humanity hanging from an iron cross.'
We, with our deluded belief that God is on our side and that our new
manifest
destiny is to control the world and all its assets, must reassess our
priorities. Is this
ill-fated adventure in Iraq (with hints of Iran to follow) worth the
agony it is causing? Do
we really want to bankrupt the nation and sacrifice our youth by pouring
our resources
into wars of folly? Do we really want to leave the rest of the world
shaking their heads as
they see this country diminishing itself by paying lip service to its
Constitution and Bill
of Rights but, at the same time, violating the very essence of those
documents? It is time
for us to awake from a long sleep, take a serious look at the world and
this country's
place in it, and recognize that we have been manipulated by an
unscrupulous band of
miscreants who have been following their own agenda. And that agenda has
nothing to
do with democracy and liberty, at least for all of us living below the
tiny sliver of
privileged and tax-free aristocrats occupying the top of society's
pyramid.
A good place to start our examination is to recognize that Kipling and Owen pulled back the curtain from myths and lies that promote wars. In a real
democracy, we
should demand transparent government and accountability. Until we do, we
are in
danger of sacrificing our 225 year old experiment in self-rule. There is
a very thin line
between democracy and despotism and at the moment we are standing on the
razor's
edge.
Gilbert Jordan is a retired English Professor from Monroe Community college, Rochester, NY and has been active in the anti-war movement. He resides in in Wyoming, NY. Gilbert can be reached at gfjordan@frontiernet.net.
###