Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Peaceful Protest Under Attack
Published on Friday, April 9, 2004 by the Denver Post
Peaceful Protest Under Attack
Editorial
 

Peaceful protest has been a cherished American right since the Boston Tea Party, but that fundamental liberty is under attack in a federal court in Miami.

In 2002, members of the activist environmental group Greenpeace tried peacefully to board a freighter headed for Miami in order to unfurl a banner calling for an end to illegal logging. Greenpeace said the freighter was hauling illegally harvested mahogany, an endangered species. The activists were arrested and fined.

Fifteen months later, the U.S. government went after Greenpeace with zeal that should be reserved for threats to national security. But this case isn't about security; it's about political retribution.

Federal prosecutors charged Greenpeace with a misdemeanor under an obscure 19th century law that forbids pimps from intercepting ships bound for port. The law against "sailormongering" has been used only twice, the last time more than 100 years ago, and in one case the judge said the statute was vague.

There's no precedent for federal prosecutors charging an organization with a crime for its members' peaceful protests. If the federal government had done so in the 1960s, there wouldn't have been NAACP lunch counter sit-ins and perhaps no civil rights movement.

There's reason to think that in the Miami case, the Bush administration is bullying an organization that has been particularly outspoken - and effective - in its criticism of Bush's environmental record.

If the feds win, the government will gain access to Greenpeace's databases and membership lists. The feds also could strip Greenpeace of its non-profit status, thus hurting the group's fundraising.

So if Greenpeace loses, American civil liberties will suffer a setback, and a disturbing legal precedent will have been set.

Today in federal court in Miami, U.S. District Judge Adelberto Jordan may rule on three motions from Greenpeace lawyers. One is a motion to dismiss the charges, another a request for a jury trial, and the third to let Greenpeace see government documents explaining why the feds filed charges. Greenpeace understandably contends the Justice Department has singled it out for prosecution.

Regardless of what Americans think of Greenpeace, they should hope the eco-group wins in court - for the sake of everyone's civil liberties.

Copyright 2004 The Denver Post

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

© Copyrighted 1997-2009