Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives
   Featured Views  

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Former Pentagon Insider: 'When we Lie about Stuff,' People Perish
Published on Friday, April 9, 2004 by the Free Lance-Star / Fredericksburg, Virginia
Former Pentagon Insider: 'When we Lie about Stuff,' People Perish
by Rick Mercier

AH, SPRING is here and its warm breezes have brought with them a hint of honesty (to which some people are as allergic as others are to pollen).

Last week, Secretary of State Colin Powell admitted to reporters that the mobile bioweapons trailers that he discussed at length in his U.N. presentation (with "artist's renderings") might not exist. Of the intelligence on which his charge was based, Powell now says: "It appears not to be the case that it was that solid."

Powell acknowledged that the so-called "Winnebagos of death" (I think I've spotted a few of these barreling down I-95 in search of the nearest RV park) constituted his "most dramatic" accusation before the United Nations. They also were the only piece of evidence he presented that pointed to ongoing WMD production by Saddam Hussein.

Like a lot of other bad Iraq intel, the reports about the trailers emanated from defectors tied to Ahmed Chalabi and his Iraqi National Congress, who were pocketing U.S. taxpayer dollars for the privilege of misleading our leaders-and, through them, us.

We should not be too quick to blame our intelligence establishment, though. Since the mid-1990s, the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, and State Department had dismissed the bulk of the INC's claims as unverifiable at best and bogus at worst.

But then the Sept. 11 attacks occurred, and certain people saw a chance to turn a crisis into an opportunity. Specifically, neoconservative ideologues inside the administration-Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and others-could taste their dream of invading Iraq, but the existing intelligence didn't lend much support for a Mesopotamian adventure.

Enter the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans. Conceived by Wolfowitz, the office grew out of the Near East South Asia directorate's Iraq desk and was officially launched in the summer of 2002-just as the administration was readying its big sales pitch for war.

The OSP's director, Abram Shulsky, is a disciple of political philosopher Leo Strauss (as is Wolfowitz). Straussians believe, among other things, that an enlightened elite sometimes has to tell a "noble lie" to bring the masses on board for something they otherwise wouldn't back (this is sort of a perverted take on Plato).

Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski got an inside look at how the OSP put Straussian principles into practice. She worked in the Pentagon's NESA directorate during the buildup to the war, and saw how the OSP went about twisting intelligence and making sure everyone remained "on message" about Iraq.

"The most important thing OSP did was, they provided a legitimate outlet for Ahmed Chalabi," Kwiatkowski told me in an interview near her home in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley.

She said the OSP funneled defectors' dubious reports through the intelligence community a second time in an effort to "corroborate" their earlier accounts. Analysts sometimes didn't realize they were seeing the same flimsy intelligence passing through the system again; instead, they thought they were getting similar information from different sources. Thus did the OSP help to "multisource" suspect claims.

Kwiatkowski said that at the same time, the OSP was channeling its "intelligence" up the food chain to high-level civilians in the Pentagon and vice president's office. White House speechwriters also must have received some of the OSP's product, she said.

The office made sure its propaganda filtered upward by disseminating talking points on Iraq that NESA desk officers were to regurgitate verbatim in materials prepared for upper-level defense officials and people outside the Pentagon, Kwiatkowski said. Some of the talking points were patently false-e.g., that Sept. 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligence agents in Prague-but some contained kernels of truth.

For instance, the talking point about Saddam using chemical weapons on his own people was indisputably true, but it failed to mention that he did this in the 1980s, that he had shown no recent inclination to use poison gas, and that whatever might have been left of his chemical-weapons stockpile had probably lost its potency and consequently was little more than sludge.

But, Kwiatkowski said, the OSP wasn't interested in producing sound intelligence; it was bent on persuading America of the need for a war.

If that's true, the obvious question arises: When did it become the job of Pentagon bureaucrats to sell a war to the American people?

Some neoconservative cheerleaders for the imperialist undertaking in Iraq have-surprise, surprise-smeared Kwiatkowski. Washington Post columnist George Will recently put words in her mouth to make her appear to be an anti-Semite. (Neoconmen such as Will have come up with a neat rhetorical trick: They contend that when critics use the term "neoconservative," it's really a code word for "Jew"; hence, anyone who bashes neoconservatives is really anti-Semitic.)

But Kwiatkowski's determination to inform Americans about the propaganda unit inside the Pentagon serves as a heroic example-one that should be followed by members of the panel appointed by Bush to look into supposed prewar intelligence failures. If they have any guts, commission members will insist on examining how the OSP helped validate what almost all credible intelligence analysts believed was suspect information.

We must not shrink from holding the neoconservative architects of this war accountable for their deceptions. As Kwiatkowski argues, it's one thing to fudge data when you're debating some domestic issue such as the economy or Medicare. "You're not going to kill hundreds and thousands of people when you do that," she says. "But in the Pentagon, when we lie about stuff, that's what happens."

Now there's something for you to think about while you're watching the television footage coming out of Iraq these days.

RICK MERCIER is a writer and editor for The Free Lance-Star. He can be reached at

Copyright 2004, The Free Lance-Star Publishing Co


Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.
Independent, non-profit newscenter since 1997.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.