Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives
   Featured Views  

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Untamed Media Vital to America
Published on Sunday, November 9, 2003 by the Capital Times
Untamed Media Vital to America

In "American Aurora," historian Richard Rosenfeld tells the tale of how in 1798 Benjamin Franklin's grandson, a rabble-rousing newspaper editor named Benjamin Bache, was imprisoned for criticizing President John Adams. It is a chilling tale of how Franklin's warning at the Constitutional Convention that the American experiment would eventually degenerate into despotism was too quickly proved true.

But the story of Bache's imprisonment and eventual release is, as well, a story of American redemption. And it is one that is well remembered this weekend, as activists from across the nation gathered in Madison for the first National Conference on Media Reform.

Just as it was in the days of the founders, the struggle to ensure that media serve some common good, as opposed to merely the private interests of media owners and their powerful allies, goes to the heart of whether the United States will be a free and functional democracy.

A media industry grounded only in entertainment and commercial values may feed the bottom line of a few corporate CEOs. But it will not nurture community or country. The United States needs media firmly grounded in the civic and democratic values that are at the root of this American experiment. Central to those values is a willingness to challenge even the most powerful.

The founding fathers recognized this when they fought to insert a freedom of the press guarantee in the First Amendment to the Constitution. They wanted media that served as a watchdog over the powerful, in government and in the private sector. And when Adams sought to constrain that watchdog function, they fought him. Jefferson's victory over Adams in 1800 sent a powerful signal that the new United States would welcome and encourage a free and a freewheeling press.

Today, however, the ability of the press to function usefully and effectively in a democratic society is again suffering from constraint. This time, the constraint comes not from a misguided president but from media companies and their allies in government, who want to see the consolidation of ownership into the hands of a few powerful corporations. They have already succeeded in some sectors: Since the passage of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, one firm, Clear Channel, has bought up more than 1,300 radio stations.

This year, the Federal Communications Commission agreed to media ownership rule changes that would allow similar consolidation of ownership in the television sector and would strike down barriers to cross-ownership between sectors. As a result, one company could eventually own the daily newspaper, several television stations, up to eight radio stations, the cable company and the primary Internet site in a city.

The FCC vote caused a national outcry. More than 2 million Americans have called on Congress to block the ownership rule changes. And Congress is listening. The Senate has already voted to block them, but President Bush and Republican leaders - who favor the rule changes - have stalled a vote in the House.

Clearly, these are serious days in the struggle to ensure that America has media that are broadly owned and competitive, that represent all views, and that nurture and sustain democracy. There are genuine threats to the freewheeling discussion of ideas, and the diversity and competition that are the lifeblood of democracy.

But the outpouring of opposition to the FCC rule changes tells us there is hope that the threat will be overcome. So too does the success of the National Conference on Media Reform, which has brought together activists from the labor movement, churches, community organizations and journalism groups to forge a powerful movement to reassert the public interest in federal decision-making on media ownership.

If America is to be a genuine democracy, that movement must prevail.

Copyright 2003 The Capital Times


Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.
Independent, non-profit newscenter since 1997.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.