Public space, universal community services and their historic traditions
which bind our nation together are all under assault. A Presidential
Commission recommends that the U.S. Postal Service obtain commercial
appraisals of their post offices and land with the view of selling the
property off to help pay its expenses. The smaller postal services can
find a place in a commercial mall to handle its "customers", advised
this Bush-appointed Commission, dominated by corporate executives.
The Government Printing Office (GPO), established by President Abraham
Lincoln who named it "The People's Printer" to educate the public by
providing all kinds of government documents, reports, and hearings at a
very cheap price, just announced it is closing its 23 retail stores in
major cities all over the country.
Reason? A GPO spokesman, Andrew M. Sherman, said that their online
operation is draining the retail end of its operations. Sales have
dropped fifty percent. The GPO said they would save the princely sum of
$1.5 million annually with all the closures.
Aggressive real estate developers are eyeing public libraries and their
urban branches with the aim of enveloping them under multi-use projects
that include stores, cinemas and condos. In return, these tax sheltered
developers will offer to pay for a portion or all of a new library
Is there anything wrong with these trends? Plenty, and they revolve
around the difference between commercial and civic values right down to
the neighborhood level.
For over two centuries, free standing Post Office buildings have
anchored communities of all sizes. In small towns and rural areas, it is
a vital force, a place to access all kinds of government information and
notices, a gathering spot to chat briefly and meet your friends and
neighbors, a place to send and receive mail and parcels. This is
something both tangibly and intangibly different than going to an
enclave in a sprawling corporate Mall. People in small town-rural
America see the Post Office as a symbol of Uncle Sam, of what the New
York Times called "the national community." It is hard to imagine people
rallying to save the Postal enclave in a Mall, as they do to save their
little Post Office.
Budget-reduced public libraries are under increasing pressure to rebuild
their libraries under multi-use projects. City Hall sees multi-use as
relieving its library budget. And the federal government can continue to
spend more every 48 hours in Iraq than its entire support of libraries
in America over one year.
Again, the loss of free-standing library structures and their
landscaping means families and individuals entering and leaving
libraries must navigate between people with shopping bags and carts
negotiating adjacent stores, parking, and all the noise. Commercial minds do not appreciate the sanctuaries of such public
institutions. They do understand dependency, however, as well as the
proverbial foot in the door toward privatization (better called
The Edison company which aspires to corporatize a goodly part of the
$400 billion annual public school budget, has suggested that schools
could be on floors of office buildings. What is so sacrosanct about a
free-standing school-house, anyway, it argues?
Then there are the GPO stores. Maybe if the GPO had a better sense of
promoting the dazzling variety of fascinating and important government
publications, it could have avoided these stores closures all together.
To be sure, there needs to be some enabling changes in the GPO's
statutory base; but was there any excuse for the GPO shredding 1500 of
the historic Watergate prosecutor's report years ago instead of letting
people know how to get this increasingly valuable historic document?
Rather than discounting, or giving away its surplus reports, the GPO
often shreds and gets a few pennies per pound for scrap paper.
The GPO store in Denver was 29 years old. The manager, Kathleen Moss,
said many of her patrons "are appalled that we're shutting down. A lot
of people would still rather come in and see the books on the shelf."
This is otherwise known as browsing with others, something some human
beings might prefer to a computer screen.
One patron of the store, who was looking for books on Gen. George
Armstrong Custer, said: "they think everybody would rather have a
computer in their lap than a book." All this to save $1.5 million
dollars, instead of actually expanding its market.
It is permissible to think that Abraham Lincoln would have disapproved.