Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Wall Street Crooks Need More Than A 'Slap On the Wrist'
Published on Friday, May 2, 2003 by CommonDreams.org
Wall Street Crooks Need More Than A 'Slap On the Wrist'
by Ralph Nader
 

Responding to criticism that he and other regulators had gone lightly in fining ten large Wall Street firms $1.4 billion for alleged conflicts of interests, New York Attorney General Eliot L. Spitzer contended that harsher penalties would have done more harm than good for the economy. "We made a decision not to destroy these financial institutions," he told reporters.

Never mind that some of the small investors who lost hundreds of billions of dollars were themselves nearly destroyed because of the misleading information they received from these bank and brokerage analysts, who, for their own profits, continued to issue "buy" recommendations even as companies' shares plummeted. Never mind that even New York Times columnist Paul Krugman calls the fines a "slap on the wrist". Never mind that after the settlement was announced Morgan Stanley's chairman said: "I don't see anything in the settlement that will concern the retail investor about Morgan Stanley. Not one thing."

Spitzer deserves his due. He filled a regulatory vacuum left by an under-staffed and weakly led SEC. He went after the biggest names on Wall Street, exposing a culture soaked through with greed and corruption. But Spitzer should also know that deterrence is an important aspect of crime prevention. And the kid-glove penalties that Spitzer and other regulators meted out last week are hardly the stuff of deterrence.

Criminal enforcement actions are infrequent. The Wall Street firms, like almost all corporate defendants, know that corporate crime prosecution budgets are so inadequate that state and federal agencies are hard-pressed to enforce criminal laws for blatantly defrauding small investors. With no credible threat and no credible deterrent, corporate criminals, and then bigcorporate law firms, need not be worried.

For Citigroup, $300 million in fines and disgorgement is less than 1 percent of last year's revenues, which topped $92 billion. Likewise, Credit Suisse First Boston's penalty of $150 million is barely pennies on the dollar of the $56 billion in revenues it took in last year. These fines come nowhere near the $7 trillion dollars that investors lost since it became apparent that the corruption on Wall Street is endemic.

Truly shocking is that the majority of the settlement may yet be tax deductible and/or covered under insurance - everything except $487 million in civil penalties, according to Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), head of the Senate Finance Committee.

On Monday, Grassley wrote: "The material made available to me so far indicates that limitations on tax deductibility and insurance reimbursement do not apply to the $387 million in disgorgement, the $432 million in independent research, and the $80 million in investor education." He plans to introduce legislation to guarantee that the costs of all future government-imposed settlements regarding any alleged violations are not shifted onto taxpayers.

Even more astonishing, however, is that these financial institutions and banks got off the hook without a single admission of wrongdoing. What this means is that defrauded small investors, who already have had the decks stacked against them by years of lawmakers' rolling back investor rights to seek restitution in the courts (most notably the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995), now will now have an even more difficult time getting their day in court.

Spitzer notably made public a thick collection of Wall Street communications that reveal just how callous many of these high-flyers were. One e-mail from a Lehman Brothers analyst stated "well, ratings and price targets are fairly meaningless anyway, but yes, the "little guy" who isn't smart about the nuances may get misled, such is the nature of my business." Spitzer said he released these documents for the use of defrauded investors.

It is time for some old fashion reforms. Federal and state governments must increase resources devoted to corporate crime enforcement. Congress should also repeal the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which made it more difficult for defrauded investors to sue. The only way to end the corruption on Wall Street is to send a message that securities firms engaged in defrauding small investors will be punished to the full extent of the law and their culpable top executives will be convicted and sent to jail.

It is also time to break up the behemoth Wall Street financial powerhouses. The Republicans and Democrats spent the last decade repealing Depression era protections for investors and allowing financial institutions to combine in unprecedented ways. Firms should never be allowed to combine stock research, investment banking (selling shares to the public) and brokerage (buying shares for customers). Firms now have an ongoing incentive to provide rosy research and have their brokerage firm push stocks on individuals that benefit not the individuals, but the Wall Street firms' corporate clients.

Congress and state regulators need to bring back the Glass-Steagal Act, which separated banking from investing and even extend it. Until the research function is separated from the brokerage and investment banking function completely, Main Street will not believe Wall Street and certainly will not entrust it with their now plundered retirement savings.

For more information on corporate accountability visit http://www.citizenworks.org

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org
Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.
Independent, non-profit newscenter since 1997.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.