On Saturday (Feb. 15), we stood on the Capitol steps in Austin, Texas --
across the street from the governor's mansion where George W. Bush once
lived -- and spoke to 10,000 Texans who had gathered to reject Bush's mad
rush to war in Iraq.
The next morning we watched National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice
explain on a talk show why the views of those 10,000 people -- and hundreds
of thousands more across the United States, and millions more around the
world who rallied and marched against a war -- don't really matter.
At first glance Rice seems right; increasingly public opinion has little to
do with public policy, which is probably why Americans feel so alienated
from politics.
In the past decade, the institutions that govern our lives have grown more
unaccountable and remote. Take a crucial issue such as corporate power.
Public outrage over Enron and similar scandals has been wide and deep. On
the eve of the 2000 election, a Business Week survey showed that nearly
three-quarters of Americans said business has gained too much power over
too many aspects of their lives. The public would like to see corporate
power curbed, yet politicians -- Republicans and Democrats -- take no
serious action.
Of all the public policy issues, none seems as remote and beyond citizen
influence as foreign policy. Even though opposition to U.S. wars persisted
throughout the 1990s, organized protest dwindled as people begin to feel
powerless.
In the past six months that trend has dramatically reversed, for several
reasons.
First, after Sept. 11, 2001, everyone sees that foreign policy directly
affects us at home; there is no denying that U.S. actions in the Middle
East have helped fertilize the soil in which terrorism grows. People
realize it is a mistake to leave such issues to foreign-policy "experts."
Second, people understand that the Bush administration is manufacturing
pretexts for war and that there is no credible threat; none of Iraq's
neighbors (with the exception of Israel, whose leaders favor a U.S. war on
Iraq for their own interests) fears an Iraqi attack. The Hussein regime is
brutal (which is not exactly news to the American officials who once
supported Hussein), but few people believe that Bush is telling the truth
about U.S. motivations. When administration officials claim a war has
nothing to do with U.S. desires to maintain and extend its global hegemony
-- including greater control over the flow of oil and oil profits -- people
around the world simply laugh.
And, perhaps most importantly, people are beginning to believe once again
that they can change things.
In public, Rice and other administration officials appear to pay little
heed to opposition. They want to undermine people's sense of their own
power, instill a sense of futility and convince us of the inevitability of
war. But in private, they no doubt are paying attention -- and are nervous.
The same has been true in the past. In 1969, President Richard Nixon had a
secret plan called "Duck Hook" to escalate dramatically the attack on
Vietnam, including the possible use of nuclear weapons. Nixon officials
planned to issue an ultimatum to North Vietnam on Nov. 1, 1969.
On Oct. 15, across the country millions took part in local demonstrations,
church services and vigils as part of Vietnam Moratorium Day. Another major
demonstration was in the works for the following month. Although the public
would not know until years later, that opposition was a main reason Nixon
canceled Duck Hook.
The Bush administration, as the Nixon administration before it, wants
desperately to ignore the rising tide of worldwide and domestic opposition
to this war. But the more we begin to believe in our own power and act on
that belief, the harder it will be to ignore us.
That is why -- even as Bush officials work desperately to block diplomatic
solutions -- all who reject the administration's militarism and plans for
empire must speak louder and press harder. That commitment by people of
conscience -- people who believe in their own power -- has changed history
in the past. Our commitment today can do the same.
Robert Jensen is an associate professor of journalism at the University of
Texas at Austin and author of the book Writing Dissent: Taking Radical
Ideas from the Margins to the Mainstream. He can be reached at
rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu. Rahul Mahajan's latest book is the forthcoming
"The U.S. War on Iraq: Myths, Facts, and Lies." He can be reached at
rahul@tao.ca.
###