Perhaps Henry Kissinger will escape final (on-this-earth)
judgement. No trial for war crimes. No public shunning for his
lying ways. No disinvitation from Nightline. Three judges
in three different countries (Chile, France, Spain) have recently
targeted him for questioning in cases involving human rights
abuses in Chile in the 1970s, and Chilean human rights victims are
suing him in the United States. (Kissinger directed the secret US
program that aimed to overthrow the democratically-elected
Salvador Allende in Chile and then supported the murderous
regime of the military tyrants who mounted a coup against
Allende.) But so far he has not had to enter the dock. He
continues to pontificate freely about US foreign policy on op-ed
pages and during media appearances.
But his public career appears to be ending on an ugly note. On
Friday, the former Secretary of State removed himself as head of
the commission created to study the failures of 9/11. Three days
later, Bush chose former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, a
moderate, well-regarded Republican not known for possessing much
insight or experience related to national security, as Kissinger's
replacement. President
George W. Bush had selected Kissinger the Wednesday before
Thanksgiving in a give-them-the-finger move aimed at the Democrats
and the 9/11 family members who had pushed, over White House
objections, for the commission. Bush and Vice President Dick
Cheney had agreed to the commission's formation, only after
winning
concessions granting the president the right to name the head of
the commission and ensuring that subpoenas could only be issued
with the approval of six of the commission's ten members. With the
panel divided evenly between Republicans and Democrats, that meant
the White House would not have to worry about Democrats on their
own issuing demands for (possibly embarrassing) information from
the White House concerning what Bush and his aides knew of the al
Qaeda threat before 9/11 and how they had responded. To further
protect the White House, Republicans have resisted the families'
call for apppointing former Senator Warren Rudman, who previously
co-chaired a national commission on terrorism, to the panel.
Though a
Republican, Rudman has a maverick streak and might sign on to
subpoenas proposed by Democrats. Kean, by the way, is no Rudman.
Kissinger, an international consultant for transnational
corporations, claimed he was forced to retreat to avoid a nasty
fight over disclosing his clients. After Bush tapped Kissinger,
much of the fuss over his appointment concerned his business
ties--not his record as a prevaricator, his embrace of human
rights-abusing regimes, or his experiences as a practitioner of
secret warfare and a stonewaller. Kissinger maintained he has no
clients--such as overseas governments or foreign firms--that would
compromise his supposed independence. But that was not the point.
Kissinger pockets millions of dollars advising US-based
corporations looking to do business overseas, sometimes in
countries where the government controls what firms receive what
contracts. Consequently, Kissinger has a strong personal interest
in maintaining friendly relations with foreign governments. If he
is assisting US companies eager to do business in Saudi Arabia,
could he be the independent-minded chair of a commission that
might have to examine the role of the Saudi government in
encouraging (or curtailing) terrorism? That is why it was
important for the public to see his client list.
Kissinger tried to skirt the disclosure laws by telling the 9/11
families he would reveal his clients to a third party chosen by
the relatives, an intermediary who would keep the names secret.
And the White House tried to rescue the appointment by declaring
Kissinger an executive branch appointment not subject to
legislative disclosure requirements. (At one point, Kissinger or
administration officials indicated to the 9/11 families that he
would only be working one day a week on the commission and, thus,
as a part-timer would be exempt from disclosure requirements.)
None of the ruses worked. After the Senate Ethics Committee
rebuffed White House pressure and released a legal opinion stating
that all members of the commission would have to disclose their
business connections, Kissinger bailed. (Former Senator George
Mitchell, chosen by the Democrats to be vice-chair of the panel,
had already withdrawn, citing time constraints and an
unwillingness to take a leave from his law firm. Former
Representative Lee Hamilton, who went into think-tankery instead
of
bucks-chasing after leaving public office, took Mitchell's spot.)
At the end of the day, Kissinger allowed private-sector enrichment
to trump public service. His business was more important than
answering the president's call. Of course, he was the wrong man
for a job--a proven liar, a fan of government secrecy, a sycophant
with no record of challenging presidents, a longtime coddler of
state terrorists. All that aside, he was not willing to sacrifice
for his country. Kissinger allies asserted he had signed
confidentiality agreements with his clients and was not free to
disclose the deals. But he could have asked these corporations for
permission to name them, arguing that in these unusual
circumstances such a step was necessary for the good of the
nation. He also reportedly feared that, even if he made his
clientele list public, his critics would have hounded him until he
sold his firm. Administration officials told reporters Kissinger,
in the words of The New York Times, "decided that severing
his ties to his company was too big a price to pay for returning
to public service."
Kissinger's greed is the nation's gain. His appointment was an
insult both to citizens who deserve accountability from their
government and to the 9/11 families who still yearn for answers.
Yet this episode exposed Kissinger's true concerns. It may well
be the last chapter in his public life; if so, it is a fitting end
to a career of perverted values. And perhaps he has unwittingly
served the public. His controversial selection and his
less-than-noble departure brought much-needed public
attention to the panel. Kissinger is gone, but, after all, the
White House's desire for a controllable commission remains.
Copyright © 2002 The Nation
###