Common Dreams NewsCenter
Gore Vidal's Article of Impeachment
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
The Voices of Conscience Must Be Heard on Iraq
Published on Friday, October 25, 2002 in the Long Island, NY Newsday
The Voices of Conscience Must Be Heard on Iraq
by Noelle Damico
 

Following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, religion was invited into the center of the public square to provide comfort to our fearful and grieving nation.

But religious traditions have more to offer than comfort. They also call us to ask critical questions, discern God's leading, make ethical judgments and witness publicly. Faith opens us up to new possibilities and refuses to believe that the way things are is the way they shall be or should be. Faith helps us to say, "It could be otherwise."

All across Long Island, people of faith who are opposed to military action in Iraq have been actively approaching their members of Congress in unprecedented numbers. We are people who come from differing traditions but who have come to the same conclusion: An attack on Iraq now is morally wrong, theologically wrong, and we will not bless it.

Do not mistake this position as idealistic ignorance of Saddam Hussein's deplorable history or potential threat. We are not naïve. Rather, we are concerned with how U.S. military aggression will destabilize the region; imperil the lives of countless children, women and men; and strengthen his hand by giving him a good reason to defend himself and his nation.

We are further concerned that the arrogant behavior of our elected leaders in claiming we are rightly the United Nations' agent (with or without the UN) presumes that the United States is morally unassailable and that our interests are indeed always and everywhere in the best interests of the whole world. An important message that religious traditions brings is the reminder that America and its government are not God, and we dare not presume to act as if we were.

Prior to the Senate's vote clearing the way for President George W. Bush to move against Iraq, I led a delegation of Jewish, Catholic and Protestant clergy and congregational leaders to the Melville office of Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). This visit was to follow up on telephone calls religious people had made to congressional offices in opposition to a U.S. military attack on Iraq. Religious leaders from the New York community of churches visited with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in Washington to express their opposition to such a military attack.

So have the voices of religious people opposed to the war been heard? It is unclear. After a speech that sounded as if she were about to vote against the resolution, Clinton voted for it, assuring us that this was not a vote for unilateralism or so-called pre-emptive strikes (despite the fact that the resolution precludes neither option). Schumer then rose and expressed his support for the resolution while hoping that the president wouldn't use the power Congress was handing him immediately.

One congressional aide said that we should expect our senators to vote their consciences, not necessarily mirror their constituents. But in a democracy, I expect their consciences to be informed by their constituents. I don't think our senators suffer from a lack of conscience, just a lack of nerve. Their consciences were amply revealed in the cautionary language of their speeches. They just didn't vote their consciences; they abdicated to the president. They gambled that a vote authorizing military power would strengthen Bush at the UN or that the power they gave would not be used. They gambled that "action is better than inaction" and that people would not blame them if something went wrong.

In fact, it was such a gamble that Schumer said we must prepare for war while praying it doesn't happen. I have bad news. When we prepare for war, we get war. To assume that somehow our prayer lives can and should be disconnected from our daily decision-making is a trivialization of prayer and God. Do I think the senator meant to trivialize prayer or God? Absolutely not. These words reveal his anguish. They were his conscience talking.

The congressional vote has been taken, and President Bush has signed the resolution. But people of faith are called to speak truth to power, so we continue to approach Congress and the president in record numbers. Many of us will join a march for peace in Washington tomorrow. We continue to vigil and teach and pray. Our voices are many. And they are growing.

The Rev. Noelle Damico is ministries coordinator for the Justice and Witness Ministries, New York Conference of the United Church of Christ.

Copyright © 2002, Newsday, Inc

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org