The mood among business lobbyists, according to a jubilant official at the
Heritage Foundation, is one of "optimism,
bordering on giddiness." They expect the elections on Nov. 5 to put Republicans
in control of all three branches of government, and have their wish lists ready.
"It's the domestic equivalent of planning for postwar Iraq," says the official.
The White House also apparently expects Christmas in November. In fact, it
is so confident that it has already given business lobbyists the gift they want
most: an end to all this nonsense about corporate reform. Back in July George
W. Bush declared, "Corporate misdeeds will be found and will be punished," touting
a new law that "authorizes new funding for investigators and technology at the
Securities and Exchange Commission to uncover wrongdoing." But that was then;
don't you know there's a war on?
The first big step in undermining reform came when Harvey Pitt, chairman of
the S.E.C., backtracked on plans to appoint a strong and independent figure to
head a new accounting oversight board.
But that was only a prelude. The S.E.C. has been underfunded for years, and
most observers — including Richard Breeden, who headed the agency when Mr. Bush's
father was president — thought that even the budget Mr. Bush signed back in July
was seriously inadequate. But now the administration wants to cancel most of the
"new funding" Mr. Bush boasted about.
Administration officials claim that the S.E.C. can still do its job with a
much smaller budget. But the S.E.C. is ludicrously underfinanced: staff lawyers
and accountants are paid half what they could get in the private sector, usually
find themselves heavily outnumbered by the legal departments of the companies
they investigate, and often must do their own typing and copying. Officials say
there are investigations that they should pursue but can't for lack of resources.
And the new law expands the S.E.C.'s responsibilities.
So what's going on? Here's a parallel. Since 1995 Congress has systematically
forced the Internal Revenue Service to shrink its operations; the number of auditors
has fallen by 28 percent. Yet it's clear that giving the I.R.S. more money would
actually reduce the federal budget deficit; the agency estimates that it loses
at least $30 billion a year in uncollected taxes, mainly because high-income taxpayers
believe they can get away with tax evasion. So starving the I.R.S. isn't about
saving money, it's about protecting affluent tax cheats.
Similarly, top officials don't really believe that the S.E.C. can do its job
with less money; the whole point is to prevent the agency from doing its job.
In retrospect, it's hard to see why anyone believed that our current leadership
was serious about corporate reform. To an extent unprecedented in recent history,
this is a government of, by and for corporate insiders. I'm not just talking about
influence, I'm talking about personal career experience. The Bush administration
contains more former C.E.O.'s than any previous administration, but as James Surowiecki
put it in The New Yorker, "Almost none of the C.E.O.'s on the Bush team headed
competitive, entrepreneurial businesses." Instead they come out of a world of
"crony capitalism, in which whom you know is more important than what you do and
how you do it." Why would they turn their backs on that world?
And don't forget the personal incentives. Almost all of those ex-C.E.O.'s
in the administration became wealthy thanks to the connections they had acquired
in Washington; the exception is Mr. Bush himself, who became wealthy thanks to
the connections his father had acquired in Washington. This process continues.
Senator Phil Gramm, who pushed through legislation that exempted Enron's
trading practices from regulation while his wife sat on the company's board, is
retiring and taking a new job: he's going to UBS Warburg, the company that bought
Enron's trading operation. Somehow, crusaders against business abuse don't get
The bottom line is that you shouldn't worry about those TV images of men in
suits doing the perp walk. That was for public consumption; now that the public
is focused on other things, it's back to business — insider business — as usual.
Copyright The New York Times Company