It's been about 40 years since a president's speeches didn't sound like infomercials.
So George W. Bush's prime time sales pitch last week on slapping a "New Ownership"
sign on Iraq was not surprising for sweating the manipulative bullets of sales
pitches -- exaggerations, inflated sincerity, half-truths, outright lies. This
isn't a Bush family specialty. Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon and
Lyndon Johnson were terrific salesmen, each more or less made for television's
blind spot for hucksters. But for sheer breadth of deception and implications
to thousands of human lives, the Bush performance for a resolution authorizing
Gulf War II can only be compared with Johnson's fabrication 38 years ago that
uselessly condemned the lives of 57,000 Americans and more than a million Vietnamese
-- the Gulf of Tonkin resolution.
The Iraq war resolution Congress approved with a mob-like majority last week
is the Tonkin of our day.
Like Bush with Iraq today, Johnson back then didn't have the facts to back
up his demand for war on North Vietnam. So he invented them. In August 1964, an
American destroyer encountered North Vietnamese patrol boats in the Gulf of Tonkin.
But nothing happened. Johnson not only invented an exchange of fire. He called
it an unprovoked attack by the North Vietnamese. Then he submitted his war resolution
to Congress, which the White House had drafted months before Tonkin. Within days,
the House was voting 414-0 and the Senate 82-2 to give Johnson his mandate for
Last year historian Michael Beschloss published an edition of the secret tapes
Johnson made in the White House around that time. The tapes make clear that Johnson
had fabricated the incident. "When we got through with all the firing," Johnson
tells his secretary of defense, Robert S. McNamara, "we concluded maybe they hadn't
fired at all." And despite his public declarations to the contrary, he did not
have a "plan for victory -- militarily or diplomatically." No matter. The momentum
of his early and frequent lies about Vietnam had picked up the speed of a demon,
and the rest is -- well, a memorial on the Washington Mall.
Same plot today, same public declarations of untenable enmity, of imminent
danger and certain victory, with one difference: The private doubts and inconsistencies
have not been suppressed so well as in Johnson's day. President Bush's fabrications
have been less crafty, more transparent, but they are of the same order of magnitude
that powered Tonkin. No one really believes that Iraq poses an imminent danger
to the United States or to its neighbors. If Saddam so much as throws a firecracker
at Saudi Arabia or Israel, Baghdad is dust. Saddam's menace of meanness and mysterious
palaces doesn't have the ballast of the 1960s' ideological scares, of red tides
washing up to the Golden Gate Bridge and Stalinist infiltrations of Boy Scout
troops and conjugal beds ("I Married an Iraqi" just doesn't have the same ring
as "I Married a Communist."). And Bush's own junta of conjurers has had an impossible
time strapping a smoking nuke to Saddam's arsenal.
Bush has been using the language of liberation to galvanize support for his
scheme, but Iraq in 2002 isn't France or Germany in 1945. It has never been a
democracy, and it isn't about to become one under America's neo-colonial rule.
There is nothing to "liberate" but oil fields and pipelines, no democracy to build
but an American garrison in the heart of the Arab world, and at Iran's flank.
Call it pay-back, provocation, opportunism. Don't call it liberation. Meanwhile
al-Qaida bounces from bombing to bombing, from Yemen to Bali to guess-where-next,
celebrating the Iraqi sideshow as a gift wrapped in American hubris.
Yet Bush sold Americans his bill of goods by playing his trump card: 9/11,
a shameless use of the memory of 3,000 Americans to justify the coming deaths
of untold others. He wants his double header -- to finish his father's war and
to give the Republican Party, for the first time since the end of the Cold War,
something brawny to run on -- and now he has it. He has his war as certainly as
his hawks had their war resolution drawn up years ago, as a strategy patiently
waiting for its opportunity. Sept. 11 was it, the sort of atrocity that can cloud
a thousand judgments and make a fraud sound licit: "I'm not willing to stake one
American life on trusting Saddam Hussein," Bush told the nation last week.
The words sound right. They sound righteous, in light of 9/11. They are also
the president's most incriminating wrong, because he is getting ready to stake
those very lives on the possibility, not the certainty, that Saddam can't be contained.
Americans and Iraqis are going to die to prevent something that may never happen,
which is very different from Americans dying in defensive retaliation for an actual
attack. One is a just cause. The other is a wager whose losing outcome is the
sacrifice of thousands of lives. The crime, yet uncommitted, is that Congress
is willing to stake those lives on trusting Bush.
Tristam is a News-Journal editorial writer. He can be reached at email@example.com.
© 2002 News-Journal Corporation