Common Dreams NewsCenter
Gore Vidal's Article of Impeachment
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Iraq II: Who Cares About the People?
Published on Wednesday, September 25, 2002 in the International Herald Tribune
Iraq II: Who Cares About the People?
by Irene Khan
 

LONDON The human rights situation in Iraq is being invoked with unusual frequency by some Western political leaders to justify military action. This selective attention to human rights is nothing but a cold and calculated manipulation of the work of human rights activists.

These same governments turned a blind eye to Amnesty International's reports of widespread human rights violations in Iraq before the Gulf War. They remained silent when thousands of unarmed Kurdish civilians were killed in Halabja in 1988.

Not only have the people of Iraq continued to suffer at the hands of the government - torture, extrajudicial execution, "disappearances," arbitrary detention and unfair trial - they have also borne the brunt of the United Nations sanctions regime since 1990. Sanctions have jeopardized the right to food, health, education and, in many cases, life of hundreds of thousands of individuals, many of them children.

There are claims that the Iraqi government is deliberately manipulating the sanctions regime for propaganda purposes - but that does not absolve the UN Security Council from its share of the responsibility for failing to heed the calls to lift all sanctions provisions that result in grave violations of the rights of the Iraqi population. As the Security Council deliberates on the use of military force, it must consider not only the security and political consequences of its action but also the inevitable human rights and humanitarian toll of war: civilians who will be killed by bombing or internal fighting, children who will die because sanctions make access to basic necessities and humanitarian assistance even harder.

Concern for the lives and security of the Iraqi people is sorely missing from the debate, not to mention the knock-on effects on the human rights of the people of neighboring countries. As the keeper of international peace and security, the Security Council has responsibility under the UN Charter to seek a solution through peaceful means first. It must remind its most powerful member that force is the last resort and only to be applied in full compliance with international law. Have we really reached that point of imminent danger which leaves no other choice?

The United Nations was created to preserve peace and promote human rights, not to encourage war.

The writer is secretary-general of Amnesty International. She contributed this comment to the International Herald Tribune.

Copyright © 2002 the International Herald Tribune

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org