Common Dreams NewsCenter
Gore Vidal's Article of Impeachment
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Must We Wave the Flag in Whole World's Face?
Published on Tuesday, February 19, 2002 in the Miami Herald
Must We Wave the Flag in Whole World's Face?
by E.R. Shipp
 
I fully understand Norman Mailer's pique with his fellow Americans -- especially since the Winter Olympics opened in Salt Lake City.

Mailer, in a series of interviews that ran in British newspapers earlier this month, expressed his exasperation with what's passing for patriotism in post-Sept. 11 America.

''America has an almost obscene infatuation with itself,'' he told The Daily Telegraph. ``Has there ever been a big, powerful country that is as patriotic as America? And patriotic in the tinniest way, with so much flag-waving? You'd really think we were some poor little republic and that if one person lost his religion for one hour, the whole thing would crumble. America is the real religion in this country.''

We do appear to be going overboard. Some people in places like Long Island are trying to outdo their neighbors for dramatic displays of the flag. And others, especially immigrants from those parts of the world forever etched in our psyches as bastions of terrorism, are feeling not-so-subtle pressure to demonstrate their allegiance to the United States by mounting flags, too.

During the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics, it really struck me that the ''U.S.A.! U.S.A.!'' rah-rahing had hit a new -- and uncomfortable -- level. After police Officer Daniel Rodriguez's now familiar -- almost de rigueur -- rendition of God Bless America, pop singer R. Kelly sang about Americans being ''the greatest.'' That was very impolite to the athletes, fans and dignitaries from around the world -- not to mention the billions watching on television -- kind of like inviting guests over for dinner and spending the entire time bragging about yourself.

The tussle over the display of the tattered flag from Ground Zero bordered on tastelessness, too. For a while, it was touch and go, with a sizable contingent of superpatriots demanding that the American athletes march in with the wounded banner as a symbol of American defiance and resilience.

Fortunately, the matter was resolved when the International Olympic Committee permitted an honor guard of police, firefighters and U.S. Olympians to solemnly carry the flag into the stadium during what turned out to be a moving ceremony that was, in the end, bigger than America. After all, the world was wounded Sept. 11.

Television coverage of the Olympics seems to focus more on American athletes -- whether they finish in the running or not -- than it does on winning athletes from other countries. Part of this is because, as Kelly Clark, the first American gold medalist in these games, said after her winning snowboard ride, ``We've had a tough few months here. It's great to give people something to cheer about.''

Fundamentally, however, this is American boosterism in overdrive. I'm less interested in tallies of which nation is ahead in the medals count than in individual accomplishment -- nationality be damned!

On some college campuses, there is a kind of counterpatriotism underway, with students protesting the war effort in Afghanistan and the possible rights abuses of Taliban and al Qaeda soldiers in U.S. custody. Some superpatriots call the dissent dishonorable.

But again, as Mailer told The Guardian: 'My feeling is that you're patriotic about America if you're obsessed with America because it's a democracy and its obligation is to improve all the time, not to stop and take bows and smell its armpits and say, `Ambrosia!' ''

Good for you, Norm!

©2002 New York Daily News

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org