Common Dreams NewsCenter
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Better World If We Start Planning Now
Published on Tuesday, October 23, 2001
Better World If We Start Planning Now
by Ann Gras
 
I have been listening and looking for word about such a plan since mid-September 2001, but it was not even mentioned. I expected it to come from the administration or in some mainstream news item - I mean, it was all Big News. But here it has been more than a month and still, on this matter, silence. If the experts aren't going to do it, we ordinary people will have to.

This plan would benefit from a whole lot of things that hardly get mentioned in our media: instant global exchange through the Internet, the shrinkage of the world, the growth in influence of the U.N., a definition of American values (although our "values" as a buzzword get plenty of press).

We ordinary people were supposed to get back to business as usual, back to normal, as fast as possible, and leave the rest to the experts. Supposedly that normalcy, that business as usual, was good enough for us. It would keep us busy and out of their hair. I soon found that my letters to my congressmen and the president and some mainstream media were few among millions. Nobody had time for millions of letters.

Well, if they aren't paying attention, now is the time for us ordinary people to start action. The government won't even notice. By the time the year 2006 rolls around, our plans will be ready to put into action, whatever they are. All it will take is for a good number of nonprofit organizations, linked by the Internet, to talk together, plan together, and work together.

So what would we use as building blocks for the great future to come? Obviously, things that are now being ignored.

For instance, the fact that this is supposed to be a government by the people, not just of the people and for the people. We the people, who are supposed to be running the show, are looked on as mere consumers. Our job is to spend money - to shop, to fly, to buy, buy, buy!

If we are needed to spend money and be consumers, there should be more of us. How about adding in the poor? According to the World Almanac of 2001, there are over 32,258,000 poor, and they wouldn't mind moving out of poverty. The thing that government and experts don't seem to understand is that the poor want and need everything. If they had money they would go out and spend it. That's what the government and experts say they want, so why not make it possible? Why waste money on the rich, who will merely put it in tax shelters?

Okay, so we have enlarged the numbers of consumers. But exactly who are the consumers? We are all consumers, even Bill Gates. The one thing none of us can do without is FOOD. We can live in caves if we want to, or migrate to southern states where it stays warm. There are enough clothes left lying around for everyone. So that takes care of shelter and clothing, but there's still a need, every day, for food. Some of us are picky and want legible labels on this food, so we know where it came from and what's in it. By the year 2006 we will find a way to provide that, since other countries are already doing it.

So we have more consumers, with enough food to go around. What does it take to turn us into citizens? Seems to me we need access and education. Education for kids is easier and cheaper than we will admit. The money that would go to testing would make sure every student has a computer. It is estimated that there are now more than one billion pages on the Web, and by 2005 one billion persons will be connected around the world. I am continuously amazed at how much I can learn that was not available when I was a kid. Information about history, literature, economics, nature, medicine, religion, agriculture, the world.

As for access, suppose we establish an office through which every citizen could express, not opinions, but ideas. The ideas would be read and answered, the good ideas would be read by a panel and eventually sent to the appropriate office. The writers would feel better, the government might be surprised, it might get some ideas it hadn't had before.

So we have citizens, fed, informed and sheltered, with access to our government, and with enough money to live on. Or is there enough? The present financial experts say there is, then they say there isn't, or won't be, or only if we borrow some. If everyone who now has two jobs only had one, if mothers were encouraged to stay home and raise kids if they wanted, would it cost so much?

Why did we vote through a minimum wage but not a maximum? If there were a maximum wage as well as a minimum wage, there would not be so much inequality. Anyone who says he needs more than a million a year might think about living on minimum wage, which is $5.15 an hour, or in poverty, which is less, and reported in 1999 as 11.8% of the population, or 32,258,000.

And there is the environment, a great asset that belongs to all of us. By the year 2006 most people will have heard enough about the environment so they will cherish it too.

And then there are the American values. These showed up this year and there was much surprise. Such a tremendous outpouring of sympathy, good will, support, friendship, caring - and not just from Americans, but from the whole world. That is what will make this plan work. Working together for a common good, starting now, realizing we have some time to work on it, we ordinary people have the greatest chance we have ever had.

Ann Gras is a 74 year-old grandmother. She did all the writing for a computer book published by Macmillan in 1983, The Software Sifter, and a few chapters for Brookline Books, on Microcomputers in Special Education. She is currently writing a book about the Five-year Plan, but is eager for company to start thinking, designing, and working on this plan.

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org