"They have attacked America because we are freedom's home and
defender; This crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take a
while, but we will rid the world of the evil-doers."
–President George W. Bush
It’s been two, short weeks since the World Trade Center attack,
and I’m absolutely terrified. The most powerful country in the world
is wallowing in its own panic, and in so doing tearing at the roots of
our liberty here at home, and planting the seeds for terrible violence
throughout the world. Almost 7,000 innocent Americans are dead,
the UN has pulled aid workers out of Afghanistan in fear of U.S.
retaliation, hundreds of thousands of refugees there are on the
move, and the World Food Program is warning that as many as 5
million Afghanis could starve to death as a result. Are our lives
really this fragile?
Without any debate or even much discussion, Congress has given
the President a $40 billion “down payment” to fight a war on
terrorism, and granted him extraordinary and unprecedented
powers to do it with. It seems clear that the government will soon
repeal restrictions preventing us from conducting extrajudicial
executions – assassinations – hiring known human rights abusers,
and will grant the Justice Department sweeping powers to conduct
wiretaps and massive surveillance. And we’ve only just started
fighting this war. This “crusade” has barely just begun. Truth be
told, I’m scared to death what tomorrow may bring. Are our lives
really this fragile?
Terror is as much of a threat to our humanity as it is to our lives
and property. If we would kill, or allow to be killed, innocents to
protect "our way of life," then what is it that we are protecting? If we
would kill, or allow to be killed, innocents then we will be morally
indistinguishable from that which we claim to be fighting: terror. We
have our “reasons," yes, but then so do the people we are
opposing. They are also responding to something. They also claim
to be defending something. They also find justifications for their
actions - rationalizations for the unjustifiable.
It is distressing to watch as we recklessly pretend that the men
who killed themselves in order to strike so terribly at us on
September 11th attacked us, as the President said, “because we
are freedom’s home and defender.” It is distressing to imagine that
we are unable to see that their pain is like our pain; unable to
imagine that their actions here might have been in response to our
actions there. These people are locked out of the political
structures of their own nations in part because of our actions and
support. They see us acting in ways that they define as
"terrorism." Are the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians who’ve
been killed over 11 years of bombings and blockade really this
invisible to us? Are the daily humiliations and deaths of
Palestinians struggling under a vicious, military occupation that we
help fund and support really this invisible to us? Are our lives really
this fragile?
Our anger toward the terrorists who killed so many innocent
Americans is reflected in our victims and would-be victims across
the world with the oldest and clearest lesson in the history of the
world: violence begets violence.
There are a set of beliefs operating here, from within our pain, that
refuses to acknowledge reality. Without confronting these
misconceptions it will be very difficult to move forward. We must
not continue a cycle of violence where our feelings of pain cause us
to lash out and create similar feelings in those whom we would
deem responsible for our suffering. For in imposing unjustifiable
suffering on others we break our own compact, and become
ourselves like these terrorists. Today, as we move so recklessly
toward war, what seeds are we planting for future catastrophes?
When Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) says, “We are coming after you.
God may have mercy on you, but we won't,” he is speaking from
pain and in panic. When Sen. Zell Miller (D-GA) says, “Bomb the
hell out of them. If there's collateral damage, so be it. They
certainly found our civilians to be expendable,” he’s speaking from
pain and in panic. When Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz says that we are going to “end states” that sponsor
terrorism, and our entire government puts the world on notice that
everyone must “choose sides,” that we no longer differentiate
between terrorists and the countries they may live in, and that they
are either “with us or against us” - we are speaking from out of our
pain and our panic. Our lives really are this fragile.
Arabs and Muslims desire no more - or less - than the things we
desire: peace, security, a chance to build a brighter future for
ourselves and our families. Though they will never secure peace
through violence, or security through violence, these extremist
movements make inroads among all peoples when moderate ones
fail to secure these basic forms of human dignity for their peoples.
As we are witnessing right here, right now. Our lives really are this
fragile.
We must face our own pain, and the pain we have caused others,
with understanding and compassion. We must face the hatred we
have sown around the world, and the hatred we have sown in our
own hearts, with understanding and compassion. We must meet
violence, at home and abroad, inside ourselves and in the world
around us, with love. Our lives really are this fragile.
We are supposed to be a nation of law. We are supposed to stand
for justice, for human rights and for civil liberties; not for blind or
indiscriminate violence and vengeance, and not for panic. If we
would stop terrorism, we must go after its root causes: poverty,
injustice, oppression. A superficial attempt to go after the
symptoms of this problem rather than its wellspring will surely fail,
and to disregard the rule of law and claim that we can attack
anyone anywhere on "evidence" we will subsequently refuse to
release, to kill other's children to supposedly protect ours - all of
this will set a terrible precedent. It will say to the world that the
only law we acknowledge outside of our borders is a drumhead
court's, a star chamber's. It will say that all we really respect is our
own power, thereby demonstrating to others that power is all we
will really respond to. But none of the causes in this world -
including our self-“defense”- is worth a single, innocent life. Not
one. That’s their logic, terrorist logic - that we must to kill to save
the world. The truth is the exact opposite: as both the Torah and
the Qu’ran teach, “To save one life is as if you have saved the
world.”
On September 16th Vice-President Cheney said, “I think this is
going to be a struggle that the United States is going to be involved
in for the foreseeable future. . . . It's going to require constant
vigilance on our part…” He’s absolutely correct. And we must
remember that constant vigilance is not just the price for
maintaining our liberty and our humanity - it’s also the cost of
destroying them. Our lives are really that fragile.
Ramzi Kysia is a Muslim-American peace activist. He serves on
the board of directors of the Education for Peace in Iraq Center
(EPIC), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group.
###