When the names of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and
former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger popped up intertwined in
the news last week, it was a magical moment for human rights activists
worldwide. For Kissinger, no doubt, it was something very different: a
source of great displeasure, certainly, and perhaps a harbinger of worse
things to come.
Last Monday, an appeals court in Santiago ordered Pinochet to submit
to the humiliation faced by any common criminal: to have his fingerprints
and mug shots, front and profile, taken by the national police. The
former general's defense lawyers are still fighting bitterly to spare him
this humiliation.
But the battle was lost even before their defeat last week. For those
of us who survived Pinochet's 1973 military coup and his ensuing 17
bloody years of dictatorship, and especially for the relatives of those
who didn't, the fight has never been about the narrow issue of hauling
the 85-year-old former general before a police camera or a magistrate's
bench. Much more important has been to correct the historical record and
to forever bestow upon Pinochet and his collaborators their soiled
legacy: primary responsibility for the murder, or "disappearance," of
more than 3,100 civilians, and the systematic torture and jailing of ten
of thousands of others. The human rights battle in Chile transcended
individual trials and focused on rescuing and restoring a collective,
historic memory that was nearly expunged by the powerful and the
arrogant.
Which brings us to Kissinger. At roughly the same hour that this
latest decision in the Pinochet case came down, agents of the French
police arrived at the Ritz Hotel in Paris, where Kissinger was
participating in a seminar, and served him with a summons requesting that
he testify as a witness in the investigation of five French citizens who
disappeared under Pinochet's rule.
The summons, which carried no legal obligation for Kissinger to
appear, was issued at the request of William Bourdon, a lawyer
representing the French victims. Bourdon insists it is "essential" that
the former secretary of state testify, given the manifold exchanges
between the U.S. and Chilean intelligence services at the time Kissinger
was overseeing the U.S. foreign policy apparatus.
Kissinger, who first served as President Richard M. Nixon's national
security advisor and then as secretary of State from 1973 to 1977 under
both Nixon and Gerald R. Ford, was neck deep in U.S. intrigues that led
to Pinochet's ascension. Kissinger was point man in the covert plotting
by the U.S. to destabilize and overthrow the elected Chilean government
of Socialist Salvador Allende, for whom I served as translator in the
early 1970s. One of those plots resulted in the kidnap and murder of
Chilean Army Chief of Staff Rene Schneider. Recently declassified U.S.
documents suggest that Kissinger and the Nixon administration actively
supported Pinochet's 1973 coup against Allende, in which the Chilean
president perished, and more than a century of Chilean democratic rule
was ended.
Those same documents further reveal that Kissinger's State Department
had knowledge of "Operation Condor," a scheme concocted by Pinochet and
other South American dictators to coordinate the assassination of
opposition leaders. The most dramatic of those killings took place just
blocks from Kissinger's Foggy Bottom offices in September 1976, when
Pinochet's secret police set off a car bomb in downtown Washington D.C.,
killing Chilean dissident Orlando Letelier and his American associate
Ronni Moffit.
While Kissinger obviously has much he could tell about these dark
chapters, he ignored the French summons and flew on to Italy. The U.S.
Embassy in Paris told the French court that issued the subpoena that it
did not want Kissinger questioned, and that he had other pressing
"obligations." It was not surprising. As the Chileans like to say, in
this world there are Big Dogs and Little Dogs. And Kissinger is about as
big as they get.
But he should neither be cocky nor confident, for his circumstances
are starting to become tantalizingly similar to the discredited dictator
he once coddled. When Chilean courts originally refused to prosecute
Pinochet, his victims turned to international venues for justice. In 1998
Pinochet, while on a private visit to London, was finally arrested by
British police acting on a warrant issued by crusading Spanish Judge
Baltazar Garzon. Garzon has been investigating the deaths of Spanish
citizens in Operation Condor.
In Kissinger's case, it is Parisian Judge Roger Le Loire who has been
investigating the disappearance of his countrymen into the macabre abyss
of Condor, and he has already issued his own warrant for Pinochet's
arrest. Two years ago, Judge Le Loire reportedly sent a request to the
Clinton administration asking permission to question Kissinger, but his
request was ignored. So when Kissinger showed up on his own private visit
to Paris last week, the judge allowed attorney Bourdon to send police to
his hotel with the written request to testify.
In Argentina, yet another magistrate, Federal Judge Rodolfo Canicoba
Corral, told reporters a few days ago that as part of his own probe into
Operation Condor, he will most likely subpoena Kissinger as either a
"defendant or suspect."
The Argentine judge, nevertheless, went on to muse that getting
Kissinger to actually show up would be "very problematic." After all,
Kissinger's place in history still rests primarily on his reported
mastery at shuttle diplomacy, on his reputation for brilliance as a
geo-political strategist, on his lucrative corporate and media
consultancies, and on his winning of the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize.
But then again, as recently as 1998, Pinochet was also a snarling and
fearsome Big Dog, considered absolutely untouchable by human law. In the
face of overwhelming prima facie evidence of massive crimes, only a
single courageous Chilean judge dared to entertain even the most basic
charges against him. When the general retired from his armed forces
command in 1998, the U.S. press celebrated him (with only casual mention
of his human rights record) as the prescient architect of a pro-American,
free-market economic model. The post-Soviet Russians held him up as an
example of inspired anticommunist governance. His own country lauded him
as a "liberator," rewarding him with the title of senator-for-life.
And yet, a scant three years later, reduced to something more like a
whimpering puppy, stripped of his parliamentary immunity, wanted by a
long list of European courts and under formal indictment in Chile,
Pinochet pathetically scampers to avoid putting inked fingers to paper.
One way or another, the registry of Augusto Pinochet's fingerprints
and mug shots will take place. And the images of the fallen hero that
will flash around the globe will be sure to haunt the midnight nightmares
of Henry Kissinger. As they well should.
Marc Cooper is a contributing editor to the Nation and author of "Pinochet and Me: A Chilean Anti-Memoir."
Copyright © 2001 Los Angeles Times
###