It was as if, at the height of the high-tech boom, in the richest country in the world, "the poor" inhabited an exotic foreign country, there for journalists to discover, but not to cover.

The official story for most of the decade, as told through record low unemployment rates in the United States, was that poverty was yesterday's "Old Economy" problem. Sure, there was the occasional story about the people prosperity "left behind" (as if by some cosmic typo), but in the major national media there was very little appetite for such downer tales.

Not when journalists were checking their soaring stock options from their desktops. Not when their employers were being gobbled up by the same glitzy media conglomerates that were supposedly leading us all to the high-tech promised land.

In fact, it seemed as if there was something vaguely gauche about bringing up poverty amidst all this plenty -- like talking loudly about death at a wedding.

And little wonder. Journalists (or "content providers") have been at the centre of the transition from "Old Economy" to New, with media, information, ideas and culture now the most valuable and coveted commodities.

The very worst place to get an accurate picture of a storm is from the relative calm of its eye. But now that the New Economy whirlwind is subsiding, necks are beginning to crane backward to see what has been lost. Entire neighbourhoods. The character of cities such as San Francisco. Space for artists, for counterculture. And, at last, poverty is being discussed in less exotic and mysterious terms.

According to several new reports, it turns out that the reason for deepening U.S. poverty is rather simple: It's all those rich people. Extreme wealth created in the top tier of the economy, rather than trickling down, is having a direct negative impact on those living in extreme poverty at the bottom.

In her new book, Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich, one of America's most respected social critics, goes "undercover" in minimum wage U.S.A. She works as a contract maid in Maine, as a Wal-Mart clerk in Minnesota, as a waitress in Florida. Her challenge is a simple one: to survive on her wages. She starts by discovering that she needs two jobs to afford her $625-a-month trailer in Forida, and her odyssey comes to an abrupt end when she can't pay for a Minneapolis motel room (the only rental available) on her Wal-Mart salary.

Economists measure the poverty level based on how much food you can buy with your salary. But food prices, Ms. Ehrenreich points out, are relatively stable while, in this economy, rental costs (when rental units are available at all) are subject to super-inflation. So her story becomes less about work, than about rent: the struggle to find a place to sleep when real estate markets are exploding and the government has abandoned affordable housing. "When the rich and the poor compete for housing in the open market," Ms. Ehrenreich writes, "the poor don't stand a chance."

The brutalities of gentrification are also the persistent theme of Secrets of Silicon Valley, a new documentary by Alan Snitow and Doborah Kaufman. The story follows high-tech temps who assemble computers and printers -- and don't earn enough to make rent in a city where the non-profit agencies that provide services to the poor are fighting their own wave of evictions.

The question of what constitutes a "living wage" in the United States reared its head again last month, when students at Harvard University staged a historic three-week sit-in of their president's office. At issue was the fact that, on a campus blessed by limitless prosperity, janitors and cafeteria workers earn as little as $6.50 an hour.

As the invisible class system of America's New Economy becomes more visible, it has much to teach countries that are striving to emulate the U.S. high-tech miracle. I keep thinking about a 50-something software programmer I met in Seattle at the height of the dot-com frenzy. Barbara Judd worked at Microsoft, but her department was staffed exclusively by temps -- or "perma-temps" as they called themselves. She had no job security, no stock options, not even, at the time, health insurance.

One day at work, she bumped into a 20-something programmer -- a staffer -- by the photocopy machine. Making small talk, the younger woman griped that she was ready to retire but was shackled to the company with "golden handcuffs." (That's high-tech lingo for millions of dollars worth of employee stock options that haven't yet "vested.")

"Yeah, well," Ms. Judd replied. "At least you have health insurance."

Naomi Klein's website: http://www.nologo.org

Copyright © 2001 Globe Interactive

###