May 01, 2018
Last December, without a single Democratic vote, Republicans in Congress passed a tax cut that enriches themselves, their wealthy donors, and big corporations--at the expense of working Americans. The tax law will balloon the federal deficit by an estimated $1.9 trillion over the next decade, ultimately handing 83 percent of the tax cuts to the wealthiest 1 percent of households while raising taxes on the bottom 53 percent of households by 2027.
Unsurprisingly, the tax law will personally enrich the members of Congress who voted in favor of it. Table 1 below shows that from just one provision of the tax law--the passthrough business deduction--majority lawmakers for whom recent financial disclosure forms are available stand to gain more than $14 million next year. Four of these lawmakers seem likely to gain $1 million or more each.
Now, just a few months later, these same lawmakers are preparing to slash assistance for families struggling to put food on the table, introducing a bill that would cut more than $20 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)--the nation's largest nutrition assistance program--over the next decade. In April, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, proposed these cuts in his purely partisan draft of the Farm Bill, the key piece of legislation governing agricultural and food assistance policy reauthorized roughly every five years.
Rep. Conaway's Farm Bill, engineered with no input from committee Democrats, would unilaterally overhaul SNAP--expanding harsh time limits for unemployed and underemployed workers; reducing benefits for low-income families facing energy costs; and stripping away state options that allow families to get back on their feet by saving modest amounts while participating in SNAP. Already, the majority of participating families can't stretch SNAP's moderate benefits--which average only about $1.40 per person per meal--to the end of the month. The proposed cuts would cause an estimated 2 million Americans--a disproportionate share of whom are in families with children--to lose SNAP or see their benefits reduced. What's more, the bill would also take away free school meals from 265,000 children.
As Table 1 shows, the $14.1 million these majority lawmakers are likely to personally gain from their tax law could be used to serve more than 10 million meals in their districts and states through SNAP. The tax cut that just one member of Congress--Rep. Trey Hollingsworth (R-IN)--stands to receive could provide more than 3.2 million meals--enough to feed nearly 3,000 people in his district for an entire year.
Polling shows that two-thirds of Americans oppose cutting food assistance for struggling families. But instead of listening to American voters, these lawmakers are not only pocketing their six- and seven-figure tax gains, they're turning around and slashing billions of dollars from families' nutrition benefits over the next decade.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Melissa Boteach
Melissa Boteach is the Vice President of the Poverty to Prosperity Program and Half in Ten Education Fund at the Center for American Progress. You can follow her on Twitter @mboteach.
Rachel West
Rachel West is a Senior Policy Analyst in the Center for American Progress's Poverty to Prosperity Program. Follow her on Twitter: @rwest817
Last December, without a single Democratic vote, Republicans in Congress passed a tax cut that enriches themselves, their wealthy donors, and big corporations--at the expense of working Americans. The tax law will balloon the federal deficit by an estimated $1.9 trillion over the next decade, ultimately handing 83 percent of the tax cuts to the wealthiest 1 percent of households while raising taxes on the bottom 53 percent of households by 2027.
Unsurprisingly, the tax law will personally enrich the members of Congress who voted in favor of it. Table 1 below shows that from just one provision of the tax law--the passthrough business deduction--majority lawmakers for whom recent financial disclosure forms are available stand to gain more than $14 million next year. Four of these lawmakers seem likely to gain $1 million or more each.
Now, just a few months later, these same lawmakers are preparing to slash assistance for families struggling to put food on the table, introducing a bill that would cut more than $20 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)--the nation's largest nutrition assistance program--over the next decade. In April, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, proposed these cuts in his purely partisan draft of the Farm Bill, the key piece of legislation governing agricultural and food assistance policy reauthorized roughly every five years.
Rep. Conaway's Farm Bill, engineered with no input from committee Democrats, would unilaterally overhaul SNAP--expanding harsh time limits for unemployed and underemployed workers; reducing benefits for low-income families facing energy costs; and stripping away state options that allow families to get back on their feet by saving modest amounts while participating in SNAP. Already, the majority of participating families can't stretch SNAP's moderate benefits--which average only about $1.40 per person per meal--to the end of the month. The proposed cuts would cause an estimated 2 million Americans--a disproportionate share of whom are in families with children--to lose SNAP or see their benefits reduced. What's more, the bill would also take away free school meals from 265,000 children.
As Table 1 shows, the $14.1 million these majority lawmakers are likely to personally gain from their tax law could be used to serve more than 10 million meals in their districts and states through SNAP. The tax cut that just one member of Congress--Rep. Trey Hollingsworth (R-IN)--stands to receive could provide more than 3.2 million meals--enough to feed nearly 3,000 people in his district for an entire year.
Polling shows that two-thirds of Americans oppose cutting food assistance for struggling families. But instead of listening to American voters, these lawmakers are not only pocketing their six- and seven-figure tax gains, they're turning around and slashing billions of dollars from families' nutrition benefits over the next decade.
Melissa Boteach
Melissa Boteach is the Vice President of the Poverty to Prosperity Program and Half in Ten Education Fund at the Center for American Progress. You can follow her on Twitter @mboteach.
Rachel West
Rachel West is a Senior Policy Analyst in the Center for American Progress's Poverty to Prosperity Program. Follow her on Twitter: @rwest817
Last December, without a single Democratic vote, Republicans in Congress passed a tax cut that enriches themselves, their wealthy donors, and big corporations--at the expense of working Americans. The tax law will balloon the federal deficit by an estimated $1.9 trillion over the next decade, ultimately handing 83 percent of the tax cuts to the wealthiest 1 percent of households while raising taxes on the bottom 53 percent of households by 2027.
Unsurprisingly, the tax law will personally enrich the members of Congress who voted in favor of it. Table 1 below shows that from just one provision of the tax law--the passthrough business deduction--majority lawmakers for whom recent financial disclosure forms are available stand to gain more than $14 million next year. Four of these lawmakers seem likely to gain $1 million or more each.
Now, just a few months later, these same lawmakers are preparing to slash assistance for families struggling to put food on the table, introducing a bill that would cut more than $20 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)--the nation's largest nutrition assistance program--over the next decade. In April, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, proposed these cuts in his purely partisan draft of the Farm Bill, the key piece of legislation governing agricultural and food assistance policy reauthorized roughly every five years.
Rep. Conaway's Farm Bill, engineered with no input from committee Democrats, would unilaterally overhaul SNAP--expanding harsh time limits for unemployed and underemployed workers; reducing benefits for low-income families facing energy costs; and stripping away state options that allow families to get back on their feet by saving modest amounts while participating in SNAP. Already, the majority of participating families can't stretch SNAP's moderate benefits--which average only about $1.40 per person per meal--to the end of the month. The proposed cuts would cause an estimated 2 million Americans--a disproportionate share of whom are in families with children--to lose SNAP or see their benefits reduced. What's more, the bill would also take away free school meals from 265,000 children.
As Table 1 shows, the $14.1 million these majority lawmakers are likely to personally gain from their tax law could be used to serve more than 10 million meals in their districts and states through SNAP. The tax cut that just one member of Congress--Rep. Trey Hollingsworth (R-IN)--stands to receive could provide more than 3.2 million meals--enough to feed nearly 3,000 people in his district for an entire year.
Polling shows that two-thirds of Americans oppose cutting food assistance for struggling families. But instead of listening to American voters, these lawmakers are not only pocketing their six- and seven-figure tax gains, they're turning around and slashing billions of dollars from families' nutrition benefits over the next decade.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.