"So we're expecting the poorest communities to take up the largest percentage of the tab." (Photo: AP)
Dec 12, 2017
Meet Betsy DeVos, Champion of Students With Special Needs.
At least that's who she's pretending to be this week.
The wealthy Republican mega-donor who bought her position as Secretary of Education published an article in the current issue of Education Week called "Commentary: Tolerating Low Expectations for Students With Disabilities Must End."
It was almost like she expected us all to forget who she actually is and her own sordid history with these kinds of children.
Up until now, the billionaire heiress and public school saboteur always put the needs of profitizers and privateers ahead of special needs children.
During her confirmation hearing, she refused to say whether she would hold private, parochial and charter schools receiving tax dollars to the same standard as public schools in regard to how they treat special education students. Once on the job, she rescinded 72 federal guidelines that had protected special education students.
But now she's coming off like a special education advocate!
What a turnaround!
It's almost like David Duke coming out in favor of civil rights! Or Roy Moore coming out in favor of protecting young girls from pedophiles! Or Donald Trump coming out in favor of protecting women from crotch grabbing!
It begs the question - who exactly is she trying to fool?
Does Education Week really expect us to buy this crap? Or has the so-called corporate media enterprise simply caved to the Trump administration's demand to publish a puff piece for rubes without any journalistic integrity?
Real journalists might have published this BS, but only after giving readers the proper context.
Not Education Week. The only nod toward objectivity was inserting the word "Commentary" in the title of DeVos's article.
It's almost like saying - DeVos ALLEGEDLY champions students with special needs.
Give me a break.
She's championing a feel good decision from the US Supreme Court from March. Way to get on that, Betsy!
Moreover, the decision isn't exactly substantive.
Great! Who doesn't want that?
Has Congress jumped on this decision to increase federal aide to help public schools meet this requirement?
Nope.
And neither is DeVos calling for any additional federal help. In fact, her administration is proposing CUTTING federal special education funding.
Yet when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was enacted in 1975 by the Gerald Ford administration, the federal government was supposed to fund 40% of the cost of all special education students. It has never met that promise.
Today, the federal government only shoulders 15.7% of the cost with the states and individual districts picking up the rest.
This is extremely unfair.
It costs roughly twice as much to educate a special education student as a non-special education student. Yet the numbers of special needs students are on the rise.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 statistics (the most recent available), students with special needs account for 8.8% of the population. That's up an additional 100,000 students from the previous year.
And the areas with the largest increase of special needs students are the most impoverished.
So we're expecting the poorest communities to take up the largest percentage of the tab.
There are several bills in Congress demanding the federal government increase funding to the 40% threshold, but DeVos didn't see fit to mention them.
To her, money is a thing only worth being lavished on private, parochial or charter schools.
Instead, she mentioned "personalized" education as a remedy for special needs students in public schools.
"No two children are the same. Each has his or her own unique abilities and needs. Personalized, student-centered education can help all children thrive, especially children with disabilities." (Emphasis mine)
Though few people really disagree with this statement, the use of the word "Personalized" sets off alarm bells.
The term has come to mean "personalized learning" or "competency based education" which is code for making students sit on a computer or a device for hours at a time completing stealth assessments. These are programs made to look like video games that really just assess the same standardized material on the typical fill-in-the-bubble high stakes test.
And the results of these assessments are likewise used against schools and students as an excuse to privatize and strip them of local control, legal protections and mandated transparency.
There are authentic ways to use technology to help kids learn, but the rush by corporations to cash in on this emerging market has been largely unregulated, unstudied and unchallenged.
DeVos has already noted her commitment to edtech solutions to academic problems.
At a conference for edtech investors earlier this year she said:
"We've just scratched the surface in the role technology can play. I only have to look at my young grandchildren to see how powerful tech is. It is a thousand flowers, and we haven't planted the whole garden."
Another place she can look is her investment portfolio.
Both she and her husband have a $5 million and $25 million investment in a shady "brain performance" company called Neurocore. DeVos even sat on the company's board until she got her job as Secretary of Education and had to step down.
The company claims to be able to train young brains to think better by hooking kids up to hats with wires hanging out of them.
I'm not kidding. The whole things goes against just about every peer-reviewed study in the field of neuroscience, but DeVos claims her company can help cure attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, anxiety, stress, depression, poor sleep, memory loss and migraines.
In other words, hooking kids up to machines of dubious scientific value is the cure for special education.
This is where we are people.
Our government is run by frauds and hucksters.
And the media calmly gives them an unchallenged platform to spout whatever nonsense they like with little to no skepticism.
So Betsy DeVos is a champion for students with disabilities, huh?
File that under B for Bullshit.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Steven Singer
Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher, blogger and education advocate. Singer is an 8th grade Language Arts teacher in western Pennsylvania. He is a Nationally Board Certified Teacher and has an MAT from the University of Pittsburgh. He is Director of the Research and Blogging Committee for the Badass Teachers Association. He is co-founder of the Pennsylvania-based education budget advocacy group T.E.A.C.H. (Tell Everyone All Cuts Hurt). He often writes at his own blog, gadflyonthewallblog.com.
Meet Betsy DeVos, Champion of Students With Special Needs.
At least that's who she's pretending to be this week.
The wealthy Republican mega-donor who bought her position as Secretary of Education published an article in the current issue of Education Week called "Commentary: Tolerating Low Expectations for Students With Disabilities Must End."
It was almost like she expected us all to forget who she actually is and her own sordid history with these kinds of children.
Up until now, the billionaire heiress and public school saboteur always put the needs of profitizers and privateers ahead of special needs children.
During her confirmation hearing, she refused to say whether she would hold private, parochial and charter schools receiving tax dollars to the same standard as public schools in regard to how they treat special education students. Once on the job, she rescinded 72 federal guidelines that had protected special education students.
But now she's coming off like a special education advocate!
What a turnaround!
It's almost like David Duke coming out in favor of civil rights! Or Roy Moore coming out in favor of protecting young girls from pedophiles! Or Donald Trump coming out in favor of protecting women from crotch grabbing!
It begs the question - who exactly is she trying to fool?
Does Education Week really expect us to buy this crap? Or has the so-called corporate media enterprise simply caved to the Trump administration's demand to publish a puff piece for rubes without any journalistic integrity?
Real journalists might have published this BS, but only after giving readers the proper context.
Not Education Week. The only nod toward objectivity was inserting the word "Commentary" in the title of DeVos's article.
It's almost like saying - DeVos ALLEGEDLY champions students with special needs.
Give me a break.
She's championing a feel good decision from the US Supreme Court from March. Way to get on that, Betsy!
Moreover, the decision isn't exactly substantive.
Great! Who doesn't want that?
Has Congress jumped on this decision to increase federal aide to help public schools meet this requirement?
Nope.
And neither is DeVos calling for any additional federal help. In fact, her administration is proposing CUTTING federal special education funding.
Yet when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was enacted in 1975 by the Gerald Ford administration, the federal government was supposed to fund 40% of the cost of all special education students. It has never met that promise.
Today, the federal government only shoulders 15.7% of the cost with the states and individual districts picking up the rest.
This is extremely unfair.
It costs roughly twice as much to educate a special education student as a non-special education student. Yet the numbers of special needs students are on the rise.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 statistics (the most recent available), students with special needs account for 8.8% of the population. That's up an additional 100,000 students from the previous year.
And the areas with the largest increase of special needs students are the most impoverished.
So we're expecting the poorest communities to take up the largest percentage of the tab.
There are several bills in Congress demanding the federal government increase funding to the 40% threshold, but DeVos didn't see fit to mention them.
To her, money is a thing only worth being lavished on private, parochial or charter schools.
Instead, she mentioned "personalized" education as a remedy for special needs students in public schools.
"No two children are the same. Each has his or her own unique abilities and needs. Personalized, student-centered education can help all children thrive, especially children with disabilities." (Emphasis mine)
Though few people really disagree with this statement, the use of the word "Personalized" sets off alarm bells.
The term has come to mean "personalized learning" or "competency based education" which is code for making students sit on a computer or a device for hours at a time completing stealth assessments. These are programs made to look like video games that really just assess the same standardized material on the typical fill-in-the-bubble high stakes test.
And the results of these assessments are likewise used against schools and students as an excuse to privatize and strip them of local control, legal protections and mandated transparency.
There are authentic ways to use technology to help kids learn, but the rush by corporations to cash in on this emerging market has been largely unregulated, unstudied and unchallenged.
DeVos has already noted her commitment to edtech solutions to academic problems.
At a conference for edtech investors earlier this year she said:
"We've just scratched the surface in the role technology can play. I only have to look at my young grandchildren to see how powerful tech is. It is a thousand flowers, and we haven't planted the whole garden."
Another place she can look is her investment portfolio.
Both she and her husband have a $5 million and $25 million investment in a shady "brain performance" company called Neurocore. DeVos even sat on the company's board until she got her job as Secretary of Education and had to step down.
The company claims to be able to train young brains to think better by hooking kids up to hats with wires hanging out of them.
I'm not kidding. The whole things goes against just about every peer-reviewed study in the field of neuroscience, but DeVos claims her company can help cure attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, anxiety, stress, depression, poor sleep, memory loss and migraines.
In other words, hooking kids up to machines of dubious scientific value is the cure for special education.
This is where we are people.
Our government is run by frauds and hucksters.
And the media calmly gives them an unchallenged platform to spout whatever nonsense they like with little to no skepticism.
So Betsy DeVos is a champion for students with disabilities, huh?
File that under B for Bullshit.
Steven Singer
Steven Singer is a husband, father, teacher, blogger and education advocate. Singer is an 8th grade Language Arts teacher in western Pennsylvania. He is a Nationally Board Certified Teacher and has an MAT from the University of Pittsburgh. He is Director of the Research and Blogging Committee for the Badass Teachers Association. He is co-founder of the Pennsylvania-based education budget advocacy group T.E.A.C.H. (Tell Everyone All Cuts Hurt). He often writes at his own blog, gadflyonthewallblog.com.
Meet Betsy DeVos, Champion of Students With Special Needs.
At least that's who she's pretending to be this week.
The wealthy Republican mega-donor who bought her position as Secretary of Education published an article in the current issue of Education Week called "Commentary: Tolerating Low Expectations for Students With Disabilities Must End."
It was almost like she expected us all to forget who she actually is and her own sordid history with these kinds of children.
Up until now, the billionaire heiress and public school saboteur always put the needs of profitizers and privateers ahead of special needs children.
During her confirmation hearing, she refused to say whether she would hold private, parochial and charter schools receiving tax dollars to the same standard as public schools in regard to how they treat special education students. Once on the job, she rescinded 72 federal guidelines that had protected special education students.
But now she's coming off like a special education advocate!
What a turnaround!
It's almost like David Duke coming out in favor of civil rights! Or Roy Moore coming out in favor of protecting young girls from pedophiles! Or Donald Trump coming out in favor of protecting women from crotch grabbing!
It begs the question - who exactly is she trying to fool?
Does Education Week really expect us to buy this crap? Or has the so-called corporate media enterprise simply caved to the Trump administration's demand to publish a puff piece for rubes without any journalistic integrity?
Real journalists might have published this BS, but only after giving readers the proper context.
Not Education Week. The only nod toward objectivity was inserting the word "Commentary" in the title of DeVos's article.
It's almost like saying - DeVos ALLEGEDLY champions students with special needs.
Give me a break.
She's championing a feel good decision from the US Supreme Court from March. Way to get on that, Betsy!
Moreover, the decision isn't exactly substantive.
Great! Who doesn't want that?
Has Congress jumped on this decision to increase federal aide to help public schools meet this requirement?
Nope.
And neither is DeVos calling for any additional federal help. In fact, her administration is proposing CUTTING federal special education funding.
Yet when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was enacted in 1975 by the Gerald Ford administration, the federal government was supposed to fund 40% of the cost of all special education students. It has never met that promise.
Today, the federal government only shoulders 15.7% of the cost with the states and individual districts picking up the rest.
This is extremely unfair.
It costs roughly twice as much to educate a special education student as a non-special education student. Yet the numbers of special needs students are on the rise.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 statistics (the most recent available), students with special needs account for 8.8% of the population. That's up an additional 100,000 students from the previous year.
And the areas with the largest increase of special needs students are the most impoverished.
So we're expecting the poorest communities to take up the largest percentage of the tab.
There are several bills in Congress demanding the federal government increase funding to the 40% threshold, but DeVos didn't see fit to mention them.
To her, money is a thing only worth being lavished on private, parochial or charter schools.
Instead, she mentioned "personalized" education as a remedy for special needs students in public schools.
"No two children are the same. Each has his or her own unique abilities and needs. Personalized, student-centered education can help all children thrive, especially children with disabilities." (Emphasis mine)
Though few people really disagree with this statement, the use of the word "Personalized" sets off alarm bells.
The term has come to mean "personalized learning" or "competency based education" which is code for making students sit on a computer or a device for hours at a time completing stealth assessments. These are programs made to look like video games that really just assess the same standardized material on the typical fill-in-the-bubble high stakes test.
And the results of these assessments are likewise used against schools and students as an excuse to privatize and strip them of local control, legal protections and mandated transparency.
There are authentic ways to use technology to help kids learn, but the rush by corporations to cash in on this emerging market has been largely unregulated, unstudied and unchallenged.
DeVos has already noted her commitment to edtech solutions to academic problems.
At a conference for edtech investors earlier this year she said:
"We've just scratched the surface in the role technology can play. I only have to look at my young grandchildren to see how powerful tech is. It is a thousand flowers, and we haven't planted the whole garden."
Another place she can look is her investment portfolio.
Both she and her husband have a $5 million and $25 million investment in a shady "brain performance" company called Neurocore. DeVos even sat on the company's board until she got her job as Secretary of Education and had to step down.
The company claims to be able to train young brains to think better by hooking kids up to hats with wires hanging out of them.
I'm not kidding. The whole things goes against just about every peer-reviewed study in the field of neuroscience, but DeVos claims her company can help cure attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, anxiety, stress, depression, poor sleep, memory loss and migraines.
In other words, hooking kids up to machines of dubious scientific value is the cure for special education.
This is where we are people.
Our government is run by frauds and hucksters.
And the media calmly gives them an unchallenged platform to spout whatever nonsense they like with little to no skepticism.
So Betsy DeVos is a champion for students with disabilities, huh?
File that under B for Bullshit.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.