To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Roughly 10 hours after another white, apparently racist Christian senselessly opened fire in a public place in the American South, Politico (7/23/15) published what has to be one of the worst pieces of Islamophobic pseudo-journalism this side of Pam Geller.
In his piece "Tennessee Is the Capital of American Jihad," author and "War on Terror" think-tanker James Kitfield sets out to draw a connection between the the recent Chattanooga shooter Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez and the case of Carlos Bledsoe, who shot up a recruiting station in Arkansas in 2009. The fact that both attacked recruiting stations, both lived in Tennessee and both were Muslim is apparently enough to make Tennessee the "Capital of American Jihad."
Yes. There is no other evidence provided. That is all.
Three of the worst things in modern journalism-the bogus trend piece, pointlessly sprawling "writerly" #longread pretense and anti-Islamic fear-mongering-have combined forces to create an absurd, albeit literate, piece of War on Terror propaganda.
First problem is the rather glaring fact that the FBI still doesn't know the Chattanooga's shooter's motive. The latest word from the FBI, despite anonymous leaks suggesting an ideological bent, is that the motives of the shooter are unknown. This isn't to say it couldn't be "jihad," but as of now the author is making an assumption that's at odds with the official government position. If Kitfield has access to some privileged information about Abdulazeez's motive, by all means he should let us, and presumably the FBI, know.
Alas, the only evidence he can produce to this effect is recent anonymous claims Abdulazeez "followed" Anwar al-Awlaki. in 2013. But as it stands now, Kitfield has the dubious honor of being the only journalist to write a trend piece based on one example. And it's one from six years ago.
The actual piece is heavy on substance; the problem is that none of the substance supports its thesis. It's a fairly involved recapping of Bledsoe's 2000s journey into jihad, but its tenuous contemporary hook of the recent Chattanooga shootings gives the distinct impression the author dusted off a previously written long-form piece on the radicalization of someone from 2009 and jammed it into a newsy context.
Indeed, in an effort to shoehorn in the Chattanooga shooting, the author gets a fairly material fact wrong right out of the gate by saying the Chattanooga shooter, Abdulazeez, is "another America-born-and-raised young man." There's only one problem: Abdulazeez was born in Kuwait to Jordanian citizenship, and came to the US when he was five or six.
And note that while Chattanooga and Memphis, where Bledsoe was from, are in the same state, they're not at all close to each other: They're 268 miles apart, about the same distance as between Boston and Philadelphia.
But never mind: The Politico piece has an ideologically convenient "trend" to sell and fears to stoke. It's filled with pro-surveillance propaganda and Cheneyesque pre-crime logic. After lamenting that Bledsoe couldn't be stopped before he attacked the recruiting center in Little Rock, Kitfield writes, "Again the FBI had a problem: It couldn't arrest anyone before an actual plot was detected." Yes, the FBI's "problem," from Kitfield's perspective, is that it can't arrest people who aren't committing crimes.
The fear-mongering graphic accompanying the piece is really the low point, however. As we've previously reported at FAIR, 60 percent of Americans don't read past the headline. As such, sensationalistic, bigoted headlines like this actually matter a great deal. Roughly 60 percent of the people who pass by this article are going to come away thinking there's an orgy of Islamic extremists lurking in the shadows of Tennessee waiting to strike.
And considering just two weeks ago-three days before the Chattanooga shooting-a Chattanooga man plead guilty to plotting to kill Muslims, this type of paranoia does play into dangerous Islamophobic fears. Fears, it turns out, that are so wildly disproportionate to the actual threat that Kitfield has to assume motives for the most recent attack and reach back to the first year of the Obama administration to populate his "terror capital" of two.
Roughly 10 hours after another white, apparently racist Christian senselessly opened fire in a public place in the American South, Politico (7/23/15) published what has to be one of the worst pieces of Islamophobic pseudo-journalism this side of Pam Geller.
In his piece "Tennessee Is the Capital of American Jihad," author and "War on Terror" think-tanker James Kitfield sets out to draw a connection between the the recent Chattanooga shooter Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez and the case of Carlos Bledsoe, who shot up a recruiting station in Arkansas in 2009. The fact that both attacked recruiting stations, both lived in Tennessee and both were Muslim is apparently enough to make Tennessee the "Capital of American Jihad."
Yes. There is no other evidence provided. That is all.
Three of the worst things in modern journalism-the bogus trend piece, pointlessly sprawling "writerly" #longread pretense and anti-Islamic fear-mongering-have combined forces to create an absurd, albeit literate, piece of War on Terror propaganda.
First problem is the rather glaring fact that the FBI still doesn't know the Chattanooga's shooter's motive. The latest word from the FBI, despite anonymous leaks suggesting an ideological bent, is that the motives of the shooter are unknown. This isn't to say it couldn't be "jihad," but as of now the author is making an assumption that's at odds with the official government position. If Kitfield has access to some privileged information about Abdulazeez's motive, by all means he should let us, and presumably the FBI, know.
Alas, the only evidence he can produce to this effect is recent anonymous claims Abdulazeez "followed" Anwar al-Awlaki. in 2013. But as it stands now, Kitfield has the dubious honor of being the only journalist to write a trend piece based on one example. And it's one from six years ago.
The actual piece is heavy on substance; the problem is that none of the substance supports its thesis. It's a fairly involved recapping of Bledsoe's 2000s journey into jihad, but its tenuous contemporary hook of the recent Chattanooga shootings gives the distinct impression the author dusted off a previously written long-form piece on the radicalization of someone from 2009 and jammed it into a newsy context.
Indeed, in an effort to shoehorn in the Chattanooga shooting, the author gets a fairly material fact wrong right out of the gate by saying the Chattanooga shooter, Abdulazeez, is "another America-born-and-raised young man." There's only one problem: Abdulazeez was born in Kuwait to Jordanian citizenship, and came to the US when he was five or six.
And note that while Chattanooga and Memphis, where Bledsoe was from, are in the same state, they're not at all close to each other: They're 268 miles apart, about the same distance as between Boston and Philadelphia.
But never mind: The Politico piece has an ideologically convenient "trend" to sell and fears to stoke. It's filled with pro-surveillance propaganda and Cheneyesque pre-crime logic. After lamenting that Bledsoe couldn't be stopped before he attacked the recruiting center in Little Rock, Kitfield writes, "Again the FBI had a problem: It couldn't arrest anyone before an actual plot was detected." Yes, the FBI's "problem," from Kitfield's perspective, is that it can't arrest people who aren't committing crimes.
The fear-mongering graphic accompanying the piece is really the low point, however. As we've previously reported at FAIR, 60 percent of Americans don't read past the headline. As such, sensationalistic, bigoted headlines like this actually matter a great deal. Roughly 60 percent of the people who pass by this article are going to come away thinking there's an orgy of Islamic extremists lurking in the shadows of Tennessee waiting to strike.
And considering just two weeks ago-three days before the Chattanooga shooting-a Chattanooga man plead guilty to plotting to kill Muslims, this type of paranoia does play into dangerous Islamophobic fears. Fears, it turns out, that are so wildly disproportionate to the actual threat that Kitfield has to assume motives for the most recent attack and reach back to the first year of the Obama administration to populate his "terror capital" of two.
Roughly 10 hours after another white, apparently racist Christian senselessly opened fire in a public place in the American South, Politico (7/23/15) published what has to be one of the worst pieces of Islamophobic pseudo-journalism this side of Pam Geller.
In his piece "Tennessee Is the Capital of American Jihad," author and "War on Terror" think-tanker James Kitfield sets out to draw a connection between the the recent Chattanooga shooter Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez and the case of Carlos Bledsoe, who shot up a recruiting station in Arkansas in 2009. The fact that both attacked recruiting stations, both lived in Tennessee and both were Muslim is apparently enough to make Tennessee the "Capital of American Jihad."
Yes. There is no other evidence provided. That is all.
Three of the worst things in modern journalism-the bogus trend piece, pointlessly sprawling "writerly" #longread pretense and anti-Islamic fear-mongering-have combined forces to create an absurd, albeit literate, piece of War on Terror propaganda.
First problem is the rather glaring fact that the FBI still doesn't know the Chattanooga's shooter's motive. The latest word from the FBI, despite anonymous leaks suggesting an ideological bent, is that the motives of the shooter are unknown. This isn't to say it couldn't be "jihad," but as of now the author is making an assumption that's at odds with the official government position. If Kitfield has access to some privileged information about Abdulazeez's motive, by all means he should let us, and presumably the FBI, know.
Alas, the only evidence he can produce to this effect is recent anonymous claims Abdulazeez "followed" Anwar al-Awlaki. in 2013. But as it stands now, Kitfield has the dubious honor of being the only journalist to write a trend piece based on one example. And it's one from six years ago.
The actual piece is heavy on substance; the problem is that none of the substance supports its thesis. It's a fairly involved recapping of Bledsoe's 2000s journey into jihad, but its tenuous contemporary hook of the recent Chattanooga shootings gives the distinct impression the author dusted off a previously written long-form piece on the radicalization of someone from 2009 and jammed it into a newsy context.
Indeed, in an effort to shoehorn in the Chattanooga shooting, the author gets a fairly material fact wrong right out of the gate by saying the Chattanooga shooter, Abdulazeez, is "another America-born-and-raised young man." There's only one problem: Abdulazeez was born in Kuwait to Jordanian citizenship, and came to the US when he was five or six.
And note that while Chattanooga and Memphis, where Bledsoe was from, are in the same state, they're not at all close to each other: They're 268 miles apart, about the same distance as between Boston and Philadelphia.
But never mind: The Politico piece has an ideologically convenient "trend" to sell and fears to stoke. It's filled with pro-surveillance propaganda and Cheneyesque pre-crime logic. After lamenting that Bledsoe couldn't be stopped before he attacked the recruiting center in Little Rock, Kitfield writes, "Again the FBI had a problem: It couldn't arrest anyone before an actual plot was detected." Yes, the FBI's "problem," from Kitfield's perspective, is that it can't arrest people who aren't committing crimes.
The fear-mongering graphic accompanying the piece is really the low point, however. As we've previously reported at FAIR, 60 percent of Americans don't read past the headline. As such, sensationalistic, bigoted headlines like this actually matter a great deal. Roughly 60 percent of the people who pass by this article are going to come away thinking there's an orgy of Islamic extremists lurking in the shadows of Tennessee waiting to strike.
And considering just two weeks ago-three days before the Chattanooga shooting-a Chattanooga man plead guilty to plotting to kill Muslims, this type of paranoia does play into dangerous Islamophobic fears. Fears, it turns out, that are so wildly disproportionate to the actual threat that Kitfield has to assume motives for the most recent attack and reach back to the first year of the Obama administration to populate his "terror capital" of two.
