May 15, 2014
The New York Times (5/14/14) announced that Jill Abramson, who has the top editorial job there of executive editor, is being replaced by current managing editor Dean Baquet. The Times' news account of the change said that publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. "declined to directly address the question he said was 'on all of your minds'-the reason for the sudden switch," but cited an unspecified "issue with management in the newsroom."
The New Yorker's Ken Auletta (5/14/14) reported that Abramson was perceived by Times management as "pushy"-in part because she inquired into why she was paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller. She also sparred with Times Co. CEO Mark Thompson over "native advertising"-the practice of allowing sponsors to disguise their ads as news content (FAIR Blog, 11/22/13)-and the growing influence of the business side of the paper over editorial. Auletta also mentions that Abramson was perceived as a supporter of investigative reporting-"at a time when Bloomberg News pulled the plug on an investigation of corruption and the princelings in China, Abramson pushed the Times to do more, even after her reporters came under pressure in China"-though he doesn't cite this as a reason that she was fired.
The influential political gossip website Politico (4/23/14) had a piece last month that alleged newsroom unhappiness over Abramson, but it was remarkably short on substance; Abramson was said to be "condescending" and to have a voice like a "nasal car honk," whereas "Dean makes people feel good."
Whether Baquet will be good for investigative reporting at the Times remains to be seen. When he served as editor of the L.A. Times, he was responsible for killing a piece that would have exposed government monitoring of US Internet traffic via "secret NSA rooms" at AT&T switching centers, a story disclosed by whistleblower Mark Klein. ABC News' Brian Ross (3/6/07) later wrote:
Klein says he decided to take his documents to the Los Angeles Times, to blow the whistle on what he calls "an illegal and Orwellian project." But after working for two months with L.A. Times reporter Joe Menn, Klein says he was told the story had been killed at the request of then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and then-director of the NSA Gen. Michael Hayden.
The Los Angeles Times' decision was made by the paper's editor at the time, Dean Baquet, now the Washington bureau chief of the New York Times. Baquet confirmed to ABCNews.com he talked with Negroponte and Hayden but says "government pressure played no role in my decision not to run the story."
Baquet says he and managing editor Doug Frantz decided "we did not have a story, that we could not figure out what was going on" based on Klein's highly technical documents. The reporter, Menn, declined to comment, but Baquet says he knows "Joe disagreed and was very disappointed." Klein says he then took his AT&T documents to the New York Times, which published its exclusive account last April.
Later, working at the New York Times, Baquet justified an "informal arrangement among several news organizations" to comply with a government request to withhold from readers the fact that a US drone base was located in Saudi Arabia: "The Saudis might shut it down because the citizenry would be very upset," Baquet told Times public editor Margaret Sullivan (FAIR Blog, 2/6/13). "We have to balance that concern with reporting the news."
As FAIR's Peter Hart noted at the time: "The Times believes that it should refrain from reporting news that people in Saudi Arabia might object to-especially if it wound up complicating our government's plans to launch military attacks from their country."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
The New York Times (5/14/14) announced that Jill Abramson, who has the top editorial job there of executive editor, is being replaced by current managing editor Dean Baquet. The Times' news account of the change said that publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. "declined to directly address the question he said was 'on all of your minds'-the reason for the sudden switch," but cited an unspecified "issue with management in the newsroom."
The New Yorker's Ken Auletta (5/14/14) reported that Abramson was perceived by Times management as "pushy"-in part because she inquired into why she was paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller. She also sparred with Times Co. CEO Mark Thompson over "native advertising"-the practice of allowing sponsors to disguise their ads as news content (FAIR Blog, 11/22/13)-and the growing influence of the business side of the paper over editorial. Auletta also mentions that Abramson was perceived as a supporter of investigative reporting-"at a time when Bloomberg News pulled the plug on an investigation of corruption and the princelings in China, Abramson pushed the Times to do more, even after her reporters came under pressure in China"-though he doesn't cite this as a reason that she was fired.
The influential political gossip website Politico (4/23/14) had a piece last month that alleged newsroom unhappiness over Abramson, but it was remarkably short on substance; Abramson was said to be "condescending" and to have a voice like a "nasal car honk," whereas "Dean makes people feel good."
Whether Baquet will be good for investigative reporting at the Times remains to be seen. When he served as editor of the L.A. Times, he was responsible for killing a piece that would have exposed government monitoring of US Internet traffic via "secret NSA rooms" at AT&T switching centers, a story disclosed by whistleblower Mark Klein. ABC News' Brian Ross (3/6/07) later wrote:
Klein says he decided to take his documents to the Los Angeles Times, to blow the whistle on what he calls "an illegal and Orwellian project." But after working for two months with L.A. Times reporter Joe Menn, Klein says he was told the story had been killed at the request of then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and then-director of the NSA Gen. Michael Hayden.
The Los Angeles Times' decision was made by the paper's editor at the time, Dean Baquet, now the Washington bureau chief of the New York Times. Baquet confirmed to ABCNews.com he talked with Negroponte and Hayden but says "government pressure played no role in my decision not to run the story."
Baquet says he and managing editor Doug Frantz decided "we did not have a story, that we could not figure out what was going on" based on Klein's highly technical documents. The reporter, Menn, declined to comment, but Baquet says he knows "Joe disagreed and was very disappointed." Klein says he then took his AT&T documents to the New York Times, which published its exclusive account last April.
Later, working at the New York Times, Baquet justified an "informal arrangement among several news organizations" to comply with a government request to withhold from readers the fact that a US drone base was located in Saudi Arabia: "The Saudis might shut it down because the citizenry would be very upset," Baquet told Times public editor Margaret Sullivan (FAIR Blog, 2/6/13). "We have to balance that concern with reporting the news."
As FAIR's Peter Hart noted at the time: "The Times believes that it should refrain from reporting news that people in Saudi Arabia might object to-especially if it wound up complicating our government's plans to launch military attacks from their country."
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
The New York Times (5/14/14) announced that Jill Abramson, who has the top editorial job there of executive editor, is being replaced by current managing editor Dean Baquet. The Times' news account of the change said that publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. "declined to directly address the question he said was 'on all of your minds'-the reason for the sudden switch," but cited an unspecified "issue with management in the newsroom."
The New Yorker's Ken Auletta (5/14/14) reported that Abramson was perceived by Times management as "pushy"-in part because she inquired into why she was paid less than her predecessor, Bill Keller. She also sparred with Times Co. CEO Mark Thompson over "native advertising"-the practice of allowing sponsors to disguise their ads as news content (FAIR Blog, 11/22/13)-and the growing influence of the business side of the paper over editorial. Auletta also mentions that Abramson was perceived as a supporter of investigative reporting-"at a time when Bloomberg News pulled the plug on an investigation of corruption and the princelings in China, Abramson pushed the Times to do more, even after her reporters came under pressure in China"-though he doesn't cite this as a reason that she was fired.
The influential political gossip website Politico (4/23/14) had a piece last month that alleged newsroom unhappiness over Abramson, but it was remarkably short on substance; Abramson was said to be "condescending" and to have a voice like a "nasal car honk," whereas "Dean makes people feel good."
Whether Baquet will be good for investigative reporting at the Times remains to be seen. When he served as editor of the L.A. Times, he was responsible for killing a piece that would have exposed government monitoring of US Internet traffic via "secret NSA rooms" at AT&T switching centers, a story disclosed by whistleblower Mark Klein. ABC News' Brian Ross (3/6/07) later wrote:
Klein says he decided to take his documents to the Los Angeles Times, to blow the whistle on what he calls "an illegal and Orwellian project." But after working for two months with L.A. Times reporter Joe Menn, Klein says he was told the story had been killed at the request of then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and then-director of the NSA Gen. Michael Hayden.
The Los Angeles Times' decision was made by the paper's editor at the time, Dean Baquet, now the Washington bureau chief of the New York Times. Baquet confirmed to ABCNews.com he talked with Negroponte and Hayden but says "government pressure played no role in my decision not to run the story."
Baquet says he and managing editor Doug Frantz decided "we did not have a story, that we could not figure out what was going on" based on Klein's highly technical documents. The reporter, Menn, declined to comment, but Baquet says he knows "Joe disagreed and was very disappointed." Klein says he then took his AT&T documents to the New York Times, which published its exclusive account last April.
Later, working at the New York Times, Baquet justified an "informal arrangement among several news organizations" to comply with a government request to withhold from readers the fact that a US drone base was located in Saudi Arabia: "The Saudis might shut it down because the citizenry would be very upset," Baquet told Times public editor Margaret Sullivan (FAIR Blog, 2/6/13). "We have to balance that concern with reporting the news."
As FAIR's Peter Hart noted at the time: "The Times believes that it should refrain from reporting news that people in Saudi Arabia might object to-especially if it wound up complicating our government's plans to launch military attacks from their country."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.