Monopoly Energy or Energy Democracy?

Published on

Monopoly Energy or Energy Democracy?

Maybe it was the report from California that large solar lease investors are making an aggressive grab for Governor Brown's groundbreaking 12,000 MW of distributed generation in CA.  Or it could have been an insider comment that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is, once again, under explosive pressure to auction off Colorado's few untouched public lands for oil and gas leasing.  This, on top of Secretary of Interior Salazar's push to open 22 million acres of ecologically valuable public lands to industrial solar development, was simply too much.

Or perhaps it was re-watching a hilarious, but tragically revealing, 2010 Daily Show where Jon Stewart reminds us that our last 8 Presidents have vowed, and failed to various degrees, to achieve energy independence and end our dependency on dirty fossil fuels. 

More likely, the State department approval of the Keystone-I tar sands pipeline was the final straw.  

In any case, I found myself staring at the hard truth that we locally-distributed clean energy advocates, climate justice activists, and regular folks who just want affordable energy that doesn't wreck the environment, are losing.  No, it's worse than that.  Our pocketbooks, planet, public safety and welfare have been hijacked as we are aggressively forced to depend on increasingly destructive and dirty energy sources.

It’s been a discouraging year.   Especially when measured against the encouraging gains being made by the rest of the world. In Canada, Ontario's economy is bursting with clean energy generation and jobs.  Despite being downplayed in the US, Germany has maintained its global lead in solar energy while pushing to go beyond nuclear. NowJapan, has adopted a new feed-in tariff (FIT) designed to spur 30,000 MW of renewable energy by 2020. (FIT's are unequivocally the most effective policy incentive for renewable energy).

The US and Colorado are dragging desperately behind in the global "race" to keep climate change in check, which at this point (392.39 ppm and counting), demands no less than a complete and immediate transformation of our global energy system. 

Adding insult to injury, we are even losing hard fought ground in our own state.  Colorado's pioneer Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing program continues to be derailed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Xcel's abrupt and steep reduction in Solar*Rewards has cost Colorado thousands of good, green jobs, and even a very modest FIT study bill didn't make it past first base in the state legislature earlier this year.  

While there have been a few hard earned gains, like Solar Garden's and solar permitting reform legislation, the bottom line - financing - for solar remains chronically anemic here in Colorado and in most of the US.

In contrast, "Monopoly Energy" is moving full throttle ahead.  Massive new natural gas, oil and industrial wind and solar "plays" are being staked out by industry across the nation, many in areas that have hitherto been spared from destructive energy development, like Huerfano County in southern Colorado.

After decades of secrecy, exemption and billions in taxpayer subsidies, we barely understand the true cost of Monopoly Energy for our communities, public health and environment.  And to make matters worse, when developed under the central, industrial old energy model, even ‘renewable’ energy sources like wind and solar, take on the same destructive qualities. 

Monopoly Energy continues to reap record profits while failing miserably to protect our health and environment.  Public cries grow stronger and demonstrations grow larger and longer.  Yet our dutifully elected 'deciders' render our environmental "laws" useless and widen the path for unpopular and dangerous Big Energy projects at the bidding of Monopoly Energy.

All of this is leading up to the painfully obvious question: Why have 'we as a nation' failed to move ahead in achieving wildly popular (and democratic) local clean energy goals, more than 40 years after we recognized the need?   

Germany's solar champion, Hermann Scheer offered this answer in an interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! shortly before his death:

“We’re in a race between centralized and decentralized, energy monopoly and energy democracy. The mobilization of society is most important and once people realize they can’t wait for the government or utilities, but can do it themselves, it will change.

Most importantly, Scheer said, 

"People need to act to overcome administrative and bureaucratic barriers that hinder renewable energy. The rules favoring conventional energy and blocking decentralized renewable energy need to be exposed and dismantled”.

Japan has learned the same lesson, albeit far more painfully than Germany.  In a recent report by Paul Gipe on Japan's recent adoption of a feed-in tariff, designed to spur more than 30,000 MW of renewable energy by 2020, he pointed out that:

"Observers say a key feature of the new law is the creation of a special parliamentary committee to determine the details of the program, including specific tariffs. In the past, this function would normally have been assigned to the powerful Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry(METI).  However, the political fallout from the nuclear disaster at Fukishima has led to a dramatic loss of trust in METI, which has opposed both the rapid expansion of renewables, and also the use of feed-in tariffs to do so. Taking program design and pricing away from METI is a major victory for renewable energy advocates in Japan"

Like METI in Japan, Monopoly Energy (including the utility industry) devoutly opposes progressive renewable energy policies that will decentralize and democratize energy systems in the US.  A major player in the Corporatocracy, Big Energy has captured Congress and the White House, dominates State energy politics and in many cases, even controls local agendas.

Reckless investors like Goldman Sachs, Chevron, Morgan Stanley and BP are even lobbying, in partnership with investor owned utilities, to monopolize ubiquitous renewable solar and wind energy resources.  By speculating on costly and inefficient remote central generation stations, Monopoly Energy is able to maintain the "old energy" business model that keeps energy consumers dependent but continues to undermine communities and the environment. 

Until people unite with the understanding that Monopoly Energy's throat-hold on our society and resources must be directly challenged and overridden, as it was in Germany and now Japan, we will continue to expect unrealistic outcomes, bend our expectations to the needs of power and fall farther behind, as the rest of the world transitions to clean energy.

Ceal Smith

Ceal Smith is a biologist, sustainability consultant and founder of the Renewable Communities Alliance in Colorado.

Share This Article

More in: