Feb 03, 2011
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
When millions took to the streets of Egypt last week to protest
the Mubarak regime and call for democratic reform, the Egyptian
government responded by cutting off Internet access and people's ability to communicate with one another and the outside world.
Such drastic action is a new way for governments to smother popular
movements worldwide... just as more and more people are turning to
Twitter, Facebook and Youtube and using cell phones to mobilize for
social chance and speak out against authoritarian regimes.
What's very worrying is that Congress is weighing legislation in the
U.S. that could give our president the authority to flip the "kill
switch" on the Internet and plunge the nation into digital darkness.
Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas
Carper (D-Dela.) introduced legislation in the last Congress that would
give the Executive Branch far-reaching authority to cut off "critical
infrastructure" in times of crisis.
The "Protect Cyberspace as a National Asset Act" wasn't passed in 2010. But, according to a recent report in Wired,
Sens. Collins and Lieberman plan to reintroduce the bill in the new
Congress. The bill as written offers a vague definition of what
constitutes an emergency, and fails to create effective checks and
balances.
Confronted by overwhelmingly negative public response, sparked in part by theWired story, the senators have gone on the defensive about the legislation. They issued a statement on Tuesday offering assurances that they do not seek to create a "kill switch" over the Internet.
Whatever the intentions, the reportedly broad, ambiguous language of
the bill and its lack of safeguards for individual freedoms are deeply
troubling. We need to be certain that no bill gives government the
authority to cut off Internet access. Such power, in the hands of the
top executive, poses a drastic threat to our First Amendment right to
free speech and assembly.
The events in Egypt show the power of the Internet in fostering free
speech and reform. Both progressive and conservative activists in the
U.S. have relied on the organizing capacity of the Web and social
networks to build popular movements as well.
We must guard against any effort to curtail our access to the open Internet. Take action here and stay tuned as this story continues to develop.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.