Sep 28, 2010
We
know the endpoint of the story: another bestseller for Bob Woodward, in
this case about a president sandbagged by his own high command and
administration officials at one another's throats over an inherited war
gone wrong. But where did the story actually begin? Well, here's the
strange thing: in a sense, Woodward's new book, Obama's Wars,
which focuses heavily on an administration review of Afghan war policy
in the fall of 2009, begins with... Woodward. Of course -- thank
heavens for American media amnesia -- amid all the attention his book is
getting, no one seems to recall that part of the tale.
Here
it is: President Obama got sandbagged by the leaked release of what
became known as "the McChrystal plan," a call by his war commander in
the field General Stanley McChrystal (and assumedly the man above him,
then-Centcom Commander General David Petraeus) for a 40,000-troop
counterinsurgency "surge." As it happened, Bob Woodward, with his Washington Post
reporter hat on, not his bestselling author one, was assumedly the
recipient of that judiciously leaked plan from a still-unknown figure,
generally suspected of being in or close to the military. On September
21, 2009, Woodward was the one who then framed the story, writing the first stern front-page piece about
the needs of the U.S. military in Afghanistan. Its headline laid out,
from that moment on, the president's options: "McChrystal: More Forces
or 'Mission Failure'" And its first paragraph went this way: "The top
U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential
assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and
bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict 'will likely
result in failure,' according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained
by The Washington Post."
The frustration of a commander-in-chief backed into a corner by his own generals, the angry backbiting Woodward
reportedly reveals in his book, all of it was, at least in part, a
product of that leak and how it played out. In other words, looked at a
certain way, Woodward facilitated the manufacture of the subject for
his own bestseller. A nifty trick for Washington's leading
stenographer.
The
set of leaks -- how appropriate for Woodward -- that were the drumbeat
of publicity for the new book over the last week also offered a classic
reminder of just how limited inside-the-Beltway policy options
invariably turn out to be (no matter how fierce the debate about them).
As one Washington Post piece put it:
"[T]he only options that were seriously considered in the White House
involved 30,000 to 40,000 more troops." And in the way he channeled and
framed the McChrystal-plan leak Woodward helped narrow those options,
while preparing the way for his own book. All in all, it's a striking
example of how the system really works, of how incestuously and narrowly
-- to cite the title of Andrew Bacevich's bestselling new book -- Washington Rules.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 TomDispatch.com
Tom Engelhardt
Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Type Media Center's TomDispatch.com. His books include: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
We
know the endpoint of the story: another bestseller for Bob Woodward, in
this case about a president sandbagged by his own high command and
administration officials at one another's throats over an inherited war
gone wrong. But where did the story actually begin? Well, here's the
strange thing: in a sense, Woodward's new book, Obama's Wars,
which focuses heavily on an administration review of Afghan war policy
in the fall of 2009, begins with... Woodward. Of course -- thank
heavens for American media amnesia -- amid all the attention his book is
getting, no one seems to recall that part of the tale.
Here
it is: President Obama got sandbagged by the leaked release of what
became known as "the McChrystal plan," a call by his war commander in
the field General Stanley McChrystal (and assumedly the man above him,
then-Centcom Commander General David Petraeus) for a 40,000-troop
counterinsurgency "surge." As it happened, Bob Woodward, with his Washington Post
reporter hat on, not his bestselling author one, was assumedly the
recipient of that judiciously leaked plan from a still-unknown figure,
generally suspected of being in or close to the military. On September
21, 2009, Woodward was the one who then framed the story, writing the first stern front-page piece about
the needs of the U.S. military in Afghanistan. Its headline laid out,
from that moment on, the president's options: "McChrystal: More Forces
or 'Mission Failure'" And its first paragraph went this way: "The top
U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential
assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and
bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict 'will likely
result in failure,' according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained
by The Washington Post."
The frustration of a commander-in-chief backed into a corner by his own generals, the angry backbiting Woodward
reportedly reveals in his book, all of it was, at least in part, a
product of that leak and how it played out. In other words, looked at a
certain way, Woodward facilitated the manufacture of the subject for
his own bestseller. A nifty trick for Washington's leading
stenographer.
The
set of leaks -- how appropriate for Woodward -- that were the drumbeat
of publicity for the new book over the last week also offered a classic
reminder of just how limited inside-the-Beltway policy options
invariably turn out to be (no matter how fierce the debate about them).
As one Washington Post piece put it:
"[T]he only options that were seriously considered in the White House
involved 30,000 to 40,000 more troops." And in the way he channeled and
framed the McChrystal-plan leak Woodward helped narrow those options,
while preparing the way for his own book. All in all, it's a striking
example of how the system really works, of how incestuously and narrowly
-- to cite the title of Andrew Bacevich's bestselling new book -- Washington Rules.
Tom Engelhardt
Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Type Media Center's TomDispatch.com. His books include: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
We
know the endpoint of the story: another bestseller for Bob Woodward, in
this case about a president sandbagged by his own high command and
administration officials at one another's throats over an inherited war
gone wrong. But where did the story actually begin? Well, here's the
strange thing: in a sense, Woodward's new book, Obama's Wars,
which focuses heavily on an administration review of Afghan war policy
in the fall of 2009, begins with... Woodward. Of course -- thank
heavens for American media amnesia -- amid all the attention his book is
getting, no one seems to recall that part of the tale.
Here
it is: President Obama got sandbagged by the leaked release of what
became known as "the McChrystal plan," a call by his war commander in
the field General Stanley McChrystal (and assumedly the man above him,
then-Centcom Commander General David Petraeus) for a 40,000-troop
counterinsurgency "surge." As it happened, Bob Woodward, with his Washington Post
reporter hat on, not his bestselling author one, was assumedly the
recipient of that judiciously leaked plan from a still-unknown figure,
generally suspected of being in or close to the military. On September
21, 2009, Woodward was the one who then framed the story, writing the first stern front-page piece about
the needs of the U.S. military in Afghanistan. Its headline laid out,
from that moment on, the president's options: "McChrystal: More Forces
or 'Mission Failure'" And its first paragraph went this way: "The top
U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential
assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and
bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict 'will likely
result in failure,' according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained
by The Washington Post."
The frustration of a commander-in-chief backed into a corner by his own generals, the angry backbiting Woodward
reportedly reveals in his book, all of it was, at least in part, a
product of that leak and how it played out. In other words, looked at a
certain way, Woodward facilitated the manufacture of the subject for
his own bestseller. A nifty trick for Washington's leading
stenographer.
The
set of leaks -- how appropriate for Woodward -- that were the drumbeat
of publicity for the new book over the last week also offered a classic
reminder of just how limited inside-the-Beltway policy options
invariably turn out to be (no matter how fierce the debate about them).
As one Washington Post piece put it:
"[T]he only options that were seriously considered in the White House
involved 30,000 to 40,000 more troops." And in the way he channeled and
framed the McChrystal-plan leak Woodward helped narrow those options,
while preparing the way for his own book. All in all, it's a striking
example of how the system really works, of how incestuously and narrowly
-- to cite the title of Andrew Bacevich's bestselling new book -- Washington Rules.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.