Does the President's 'Clean Coal' Glibness Turn American Citizens Into Acceptable Collateral Damage?

No American leader has done more to advance a clean energy future
than President Obama. Nor has any American president done more to
invoke a mandate for stricter workplace safety and environmental
regulations.

And yet, ever since President Obama first visited my native southern
Illinois coalfields in 1997 on a golf outing with a fellow state
legislator, he has seemingly failed to grasp the staggering human and
environmental toll of coal mining and coal burning on our coalfield
communities--and ultimately, the nation.

No American leader has done more to advance a clean energy future
than President Obama. Nor has any American president done more to
invoke a mandate for stricter workplace safety and environmental
regulations.

And yet, ever since President Obama first visited my native southern
Illinois coalfields in 1997 on a golf outing with a fellow state
legislator, he has seemingly failed to grasp the staggering human and
environmental toll of coal mining and coal burning on our coalfield
communities--and ultimately, the nation.

Regardless of how cap' n' trade and carbon cap' n' storage schemes
pan out in the far-flung future for coal-fired plants, there is one
indisputable truth about "clean coal": It will ramp up deadly strip
mining and underground coal mining production by an estimated 25-30
percent.

Clean coal, therefore, is not just words. It's a death sentence for coalfield communities.

And every time our President glibly spins "clean coal," he does not
simply offend black lung-afflicted and injured coal miners and their
families in the American coalfields; he disregards the mounting death
toll from "real coal."

Makes you wonder: Does President Obama's glibness, for whatever
reasons of practicality or politics, turn American citizens into
acceptable collateral damage in a confounding defense of our nation's
dirty energy policy?

Even a cursory look into the history of coal mining in his adopted
state of Illinois--the proclaimed "Saudi Arabia of Coal"--would inform
the President that hopelessness in the American coalfields has been
wedded to a mind-boggling death toll.

On the President's first trip to the southern Illinois coalfields in
1997, as part of a golf junket, the coal company executives pounded
nails into the green to keep the eternal springtime of coal alive. They
played the nostalgia trump card, conjuring images of great lines of
coal trains and tipples, and huge ranks of coal miners emerging out of
the depths of the earth in an endless parade of employment
opportunities. They heralded the coming of "clean coal" technology.

But nostalgia, like denial, is a deadly game.

No one on that golf course would have paused for a moment, pointed
to a landmark a few miles away to the south, and recalled an explosion
on the last working day before Christmas in 1951, when mining safety
violations were ignored and a buildup of methane gas ripped through the
nearby New Orient No. 2 mine and took the lives of 119 miners.

More than 104,000 miners in America have died in coal mines since
1900. Every day, three coal miners still die from black lung disease;
over 10,000 miners, according to the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, died in the last decade. In the
meantime, the external economic costs of the Black Lung Program have
saddled taxpayers with billions of dollars. The injuries and deaths
caused by overburdened coal trucks continue to pile up.

Miners are not the only Americans to suffer from the dangerous
pollutants, including mercury, that filter into our air and water from
the mines. According to the American Lung Association, 24,000 Americans
die prematurely from coal-fired plant pollution each year. Another
550,000 asthma attacks, 38,000 heart attacks, and 12,000 hospital
admissions are also attributed to coal- red plants. An Environmental
Protection Agency study found that long-term exposure to "particulate
matter of 2.5 microns and smaller (Pm2.5)," which coal-fired plants
contributed, "shortens the average lifespan by 14 years."

When the Obama administration released a previously held 2002 study
carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency on the dangers of
toxic coal-ash ponds, Charleston Gazette reporter Ken Ward noted: "The
EPA estimates that 1 in 50 nearby residents could get cancer from
exposure to arsenic leaking into drinking water wells from unlined
waste ponds that mix ash with coal refuse. Threats are also posed by
high levels of other metals, including boron, sele-
nium and lead."

Not that our President has ever been unaware of the deadly effects of coal.

The dinosaur Fisk Generating Station in his adopted city of Chicago
billows out thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and
carbon dioxide emissions, as well as 117 tons of particulate matter
that led to hundreds of heart attacks and thousands of asthma attacks
every year.

But the President's disregard for the casualties of coal are part of a historical pattern.

The coal industry golf pros surrounding Obama in 1997 most likely
didn't tell the young state senator that their fathers and grandfathers
and great-grandfathers had carried on this same conversation with
politicians from Chicago for the past century; that "clean coal" has
been sold as a slogan since the 1890s. That by 1905, virtually all
southern Illinois mineral rights had been bought up by a torrent of
Chicago speculators and coal operators, relegating the region to the
vassal status of a supply-and-demand extraction colony subject to the
whims of the senator's own constituents.

No one probably confessed to the fact that the region's coal
industry had peaked in 1918. Over 100,000 miners produced more than 100
million tons in the early 1920s; a little more than 3,000 miners
churned out 30 million tons today.

By the 1930s, according to a government report, those same Chicago
coal companies had abandoned the region and left a picture of "almost
unrelieved, utter economic devastation." As one of the most depressed
and vulnerable places in the country, the southern Illinois coalfields
had been given over to "hopeless poverty."

That same sense of hopelessness, of being abandoned by a government
beholden to the whims of outside Big Coal companies still resonates
today.

Out of the 1,300 mines that had been opened in the state of
Illinois, less than 25 remained by the end of the twentieth century,
leaving the federal and state governments with a bill for billions of
dollars to clean up the dangerous sites and toxic waste seeping into
the region's watersheds. Thousands of fertile farmland acres and lush
Shawnee forests have been strip-mined and left to the unmanaged spoils
of weeds, foreign grasses, and sterile creeks. Cancer and health
problems soar. The coal miners, too, have been abandoned: Their town
squares and schools are boarded up; their hard-earned property values
have wiped out in the boom-bust cycles of a single economy.

This is the real cost of the President's "clean coal" rhetoric for
American citizens in the coalfields: Dirty coal has remained the
merciless king, and the land and its residents must defend themselves
against the daily onslaught of the monarch's extraction for more wealth.

That is a historical crime that deserves a real solution, a clean
energy future--not something we should discuss glibly as "clean coal."

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.