Blind in Afghanistan

One of the paradoxes of America's bumbling intervention in Afghanistan
is that the United States knows next to nothing about the country it is
occupying. Not only that, but America's learning curve is so steep that
it will be years, or decades, before our military and our intelligence
services finally figure out which end is up -- if they ever do. Which
raises the question: how does years-long counterinsurgency learning
curve sqaure with President Obama's pledge to start withdrawing troops
by July, 2011?

I raise that question because that deadline will be long come and
gone and US forces there still won't have any idea what they're doing.

Last October, in a column here entitled "McChrystal Admits: We Don't Understand the Afghans,"
I quoted fairly extensively from General Stanley McChrystal's leaked,
66-page report on the war, in which he acknowledged that the United
States and its allies, under the umbrella of ISAF (International
Security Assistance Force), are blind to Afghanistan's complexities. In
the report, McChrystal wrote:

"ISAF has not sufficiently studied Afghanistan's
peoples, whose needs, identities, and grievances vary from province to
province and from valley to valley."

And:

"Afghan social, political, economic, and cultural
affairs are complex and poorly understood. ISAF does not sufficiently
appreciate the dynamics in local communities, nor how the insurgency,
corruption, incompetent officials, power-brokers, and criminality all
combine to affect the Afghan population."

Now comes Major General Michael T. Flynn, the deputy chief of staff for
intelligence in Afghanistan, who released a paper through the Center for a New American Security that sharply criticizes America's floundering intelligence effort in Afghanistan. (You can read the entire 28-page document here.) In the executive summary, General Flynn writes:

"The paper argues that because the United States has
focused the overwhelming majority of collection efforts and analytical
brainpower on insurgent groups, our intelligence apparatus still finds
itself unable to answer fundamental questions about the environment in
which we operate and the people we are trying to protect and persuade."

Flynn brags about the recent creation of the "Information Dominance
Center," whose Orwellian title suggests a comprehensive effort to
figure out the country that we stumbled into nine years ago. The key
quote from Flynn's report says otherwise:

"Ignorant of local economics and landowners, hazy about
who the powerbrokers are and how they might be influenced, incurious
about the correlations between various development projects and the
levels of cooperation among villagers, and disengaged from people in
the best position to find answers - whether aid workers or Afghan
soldiers - U.S. intelligence officers and analysts can do little but
shrug in response to high level decision-makers seeking the knowledge,
analysis, and information they need to wage a successful
counterinsurgency."

Meanwhile, a scathing piece in the New York Times
notes that the US military is pathetically deprived of the kind of
people it needs before it has any idea about what to do in Afghanistan.
The Times reports that Admiral Mullen, chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, is very concerned about the lack of Afghan experts
inside the armed forces:

"In a memo sent last month to the chiefs of the Army,
Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, Admiral Mullen expressed concern that
the services were not consistently providing the 'best and the
brightest leaders' for the program's corps, whose members will work in
the field and at headquarters.

"'In many cases, the volunteers have been the right people for this
very critical program,' Admiral Mullen said in the one-page memo, dated
Dec. 14. 'However, I am concerned that this is not the case across the
board.'"

To fix the problem, the military is stepping up training, recruiting,
and language instruction, but on a timetable that suggests a years-long
COIN effort, since the graduates of this effort won't even arrive in
Afghanistan until mid-2011, exactly when the withdrawal of US forces is
supposed to start:

"The program was conceived as a way to develop a pool
of uniformed experts who would spend several years rotating between
assignments in Afghanistan or Pakistan, and desk jobs in Washington or
other headquarters working on the same regional issues. At the outset,
volunteers receive cultural training and 16 weeks of language
instruction in Dari, Pashto or Urdu. In time, they are expected to
provide a deep bench for assignments that could significantly alter the
course of the war.

"The military expects to fill all of the positions by the summer of
2011. The first 304 positions -- including trainers, military planners
and advisers to Afghan ministries -- will be assigned in Afghanistan
and Pakistan by November 2010."

Chas Freeman, the former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, told me years
ago, after the US blundered into Iraq, "We haven't invaded Iraq, we've
invaded the Iraq of our dreams." What President Bush and his fellow
bunglers did was to invade a country it knew virtually nothing about.
The same can be said of Afghanistan. In both cases, the nations that
America dreamed about have turned into nightmares.