To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
If there is nothing to protect that relates to national security,
every bit of the health reform legislation debate and negotiation should be
done in public. Period.
We read today that C-SPAN is arguing that the negotiations between
the House and the Senate on their healthcare bills need to be done while their
cameras are rolling. I agree.
If there is nothing to protect that relates to national security,
every bit of the health reform legislation debate and negotiation should be
done in public. Period.
We read today that C-SPAN is arguing that the negotiations between
the House and the Senate on their healthcare bills need to be done while their
cameras are rolling. I agree.
But isn't it just a sign of our times that no major print media
argued that issue on our behalf? The New York Times or Washington Post? Or
even the Associated Press that reported on little ol' C-SPAN? Or how about one
of the major news networks? ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN?
When I worked as a journalist in South Dakota, even when small
city governments tried to go into executive session to avoid scrutiny of
sweetheart deals for local contractors or campaign contributors or to avoid
embarrassment for friends of the mayor or city commission members, we in the
local press called those bodies to task for not following open meetings laws.
The public's business needs to be done in public. And this
healthcare reform legislation is not only spending our money, it is determining
the course of our lives in a very personal and profound way. We may live or
die, suffer financial trauma or be fined, have access to doctors or be denied
that access, all based on what Congress seeks to finish quickly behind closed
doors. This is not an appropriate way to complete this process.
"Sunlight is the best disinfectant," reads a well-known quote from
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, referring to the benefits of
openness and transparency in public policy.
If this healthcare reform legislation has been done in the best
interests of the public, no Congressional member ought to fear full and
accurate vetting of every inch of the process and detail of the bill in full
view of the public and the press.
Now, if we just had an engaged and
independent-of-corporate-control press demanding to know all not only on our
behalf but on behalf of the nation. Handing over the health of our nation to
the for-profit insurance industry is a very large step to take on faith that it
will work out well in the end.
Do you hear the insurance industry really fighting any of this?
Is the silence deafening to anyone else but me? Where is Karen Ignagni, the
industry's top spokesperson? Perhaps she's waiting in the wings for the
invitation to the Rose Garden bill signing ceremony and then into the front row
for the State of the Union address. Safe bet she's been weighing in all along
the way. We're just not privy to that, and we should be.
And we - the American people -- cannot even get a camera into the
Congressional meetings in which our personal fate is being decided and our
funds being committed for healthcare? If they have nothing to hide from us,
let it all hang out. Let us see it and let us understand all the forces that
made this health reform effort what it has been and what it will be. Let the
cameras in. Let the reporters in. Let the American people in.
Everybody in, nobody out. It works for lots of arguments,
including public policy and healthcare.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
If there is nothing to protect that relates to national security,
every bit of the health reform legislation debate and negotiation should be
done in public. Period.
We read today that C-SPAN is arguing that the negotiations between
the House and the Senate on their healthcare bills need to be done while their
cameras are rolling. I agree.
But isn't it just a sign of our times that no major print media
argued that issue on our behalf? The New York Times or Washington Post? Or
even the Associated Press that reported on little ol' C-SPAN? Or how about one
of the major news networks? ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN?
When I worked as a journalist in South Dakota, even when small
city governments tried to go into executive session to avoid scrutiny of
sweetheart deals for local contractors or campaign contributors or to avoid
embarrassment for friends of the mayor or city commission members, we in the
local press called those bodies to task for not following open meetings laws.
The public's business needs to be done in public. And this
healthcare reform legislation is not only spending our money, it is determining
the course of our lives in a very personal and profound way. We may live or
die, suffer financial trauma or be fined, have access to doctors or be denied
that access, all based on what Congress seeks to finish quickly behind closed
doors. This is not an appropriate way to complete this process.
"Sunlight is the best disinfectant," reads a well-known quote from
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, referring to the benefits of
openness and transparency in public policy.
If this healthcare reform legislation has been done in the best
interests of the public, no Congressional member ought to fear full and
accurate vetting of every inch of the process and detail of the bill in full
view of the public and the press.
Now, if we just had an engaged and
independent-of-corporate-control press demanding to know all not only on our
behalf but on behalf of the nation. Handing over the health of our nation to
the for-profit insurance industry is a very large step to take on faith that it
will work out well in the end.
Do you hear the insurance industry really fighting any of this?
Is the silence deafening to anyone else but me? Where is Karen Ignagni, the
industry's top spokesperson? Perhaps she's waiting in the wings for the
invitation to the Rose Garden bill signing ceremony and then into the front row
for the State of the Union address. Safe bet she's been weighing in all along
the way. We're just not privy to that, and we should be.
And we - the American people -- cannot even get a camera into the
Congressional meetings in which our personal fate is being decided and our
funds being committed for healthcare? If they have nothing to hide from us,
let it all hang out. Let us see it and let us understand all the forces that
made this health reform effort what it has been and what it will be. Let the
cameras in. Let the reporters in. Let the American people in.
Everybody in, nobody out. It works for lots of arguments,
including public policy and healthcare.
If there is nothing to protect that relates to national security,
every bit of the health reform legislation debate and negotiation should be
done in public. Period.
We read today that C-SPAN is arguing that the negotiations between
the House and the Senate on their healthcare bills need to be done while their
cameras are rolling. I agree.
But isn't it just a sign of our times that no major print media
argued that issue on our behalf? The New York Times or Washington Post? Or
even the Associated Press that reported on little ol' C-SPAN? Or how about one
of the major news networks? ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN?
When I worked as a journalist in South Dakota, even when small
city governments tried to go into executive session to avoid scrutiny of
sweetheart deals for local contractors or campaign contributors or to avoid
embarrassment for friends of the mayor or city commission members, we in the
local press called those bodies to task for not following open meetings laws.
The public's business needs to be done in public. And this
healthcare reform legislation is not only spending our money, it is determining
the course of our lives in a very personal and profound way. We may live or
die, suffer financial trauma or be fined, have access to doctors or be denied
that access, all based on what Congress seeks to finish quickly behind closed
doors. This is not an appropriate way to complete this process.
"Sunlight is the best disinfectant," reads a well-known quote from
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, referring to the benefits of
openness and transparency in public policy.
If this healthcare reform legislation has been done in the best
interests of the public, no Congressional member ought to fear full and
accurate vetting of every inch of the process and detail of the bill in full
view of the public and the press.
Now, if we just had an engaged and
independent-of-corporate-control press demanding to know all not only on our
behalf but on behalf of the nation. Handing over the health of our nation to
the for-profit insurance industry is a very large step to take on faith that it
will work out well in the end.
Do you hear the insurance industry really fighting any of this?
Is the silence deafening to anyone else but me? Where is Karen Ignagni, the
industry's top spokesperson? Perhaps she's waiting in the wings for the
invitation to the Rose Garden bill signing ceremony and then into the front row
for the State of the Union address. Safe bet she's been weighing in all along
the way. We're just not privy to that, and we should be.
And we - the American people -- cannot even get a camera into the
Congressional meetings in which our personal fate is being decided and our
funds being committed for healthcare? If they have nothing to hide from us,
let it all hang out. Let us see it and let us understand all the forces that
made this health reform effort what it has been and what it will be. Let the
cameras in. Let the reporters in. Let the American people in.
Everybody in, nobody out. It works for lots of arguments,
including public policy and healthcare.