Nov 09, 2009
Television broadcasters in the Aloha State have been quietly embarking on an underhanded media merger for more than a year.
In August, the CBS, NBC and MyNetwork affiliates in Honolulu
announced that they were folding into one of the "largest television
news operations" in Hawaii, combining the stations' staff and
newsrooms. The three news stations will now be housed in the same
place, sharing reporters and editorial ideas, but they will broadcast
from separate channels, appearing as distinct entities to viewers.
Nearly 70 employees from the stations will lose their jobs.
The consolidated operation will be controlled by one company: Raycom
Media. Raycom is among the nation's largest broadcasters, with 46
television stations in 36 markets and 18 states. The company has been
careful not to call the deal "media consolidation," instead referring
to it as an innocuous "Shared Services Agreement." Raycom says the arrangement will save struggling news stations.
But one public interest organization in Hawaii isn't buying Raycom's
PR spin. In September, the nonprofit group Media Council Hawaii,
represented by Georgetown University's Institute for Public
Representation, filed an official complaint
(PDF link) with the Federal Communications Commission. The complaint
alleges that because Raycom will effectively control the local news
programming, personnel and finances of all three stations, the
agreement is actually an illegal license transfer that violates FCC
local television ownership rules.
The FCC followed up on the complaint earlier this month by
requesting additional information about the agreements from the
broadcast stations and Raycom. In response, Media Council Hawaii
reiterated its concerns: "If the Commission does not act promptly to
stop this...run around its ownership limits, stations all over the
country that are experiencing financial difficulties will enter into
similar arrangements."
Bypassing federal law
The FCC's longstanding local television ownership rules prohibit an
entity from controlling two top-four stations or more than two stations
in the same area. The rules exist for a reason: to protect competition
and viewpoint diversity in local communities.
It's important that TV stations keep their news operations separate
to ensure that viewers get varying information and viewpoints. We want
media to compete for our eyeballs by serving up quality reporting.
Already, media consolidation has led to disastrous results
for news in communities. As more and more absentee corporations have
gobbled up TV stations in the pursuit of profit, local news has become
increasingly cookie-cutter. News segments focus on cheap and easily
produced programming. If we've learned anything from media
consolidation to date, it's that it degrades investigative journalism
and quality reporting.
Raycom argues that its local news sharing doesn't violate ownership
rules because there was no "official" transfer of licenses. "We do not
need any regulatory approvals," Paul McTear, the company's CEO, told KITV.com.
In reality, Raycom will control three stations serving Honolulu, two
of which are among the capital's top four stations. Hawaiians will get
fewer reporters on the beat, with one company deciding what gets on the
air.
"Better coverage" for communities, as Raycom suggests? Hardly. Sounds like covert consolidation to me.
'Inroads' into quality coverage
Local news sharing agreements aren't just cropping up in Hawaii. In
an attempt to cut costs, dozens of broadcast stations are now pooling
news video. NBC, Tribune Broadcasting, and CBS are just a few of the
media giants involved in similar agreements.
In May, three local TV stations in Washington, D.C., announced they
were reducing expenses by pooling video of breaking news. "We're in an
economic time when [we] have to look for every efficiency we can,"
Duffy Dyer, general manager of one of the stations, told the Washington Post.
"It's never made a great deal of sense to have 15 cameras at some
scheduled news event or ribbon-cutting. This is a good place to start
making some inroads."
But where do these "inroads" lead? Dyer downplays the real
ramifications of trimmed and consolidated news gathering operations:
Fewer camera people on the streets and reporters on beats means we get
less news coverage, period. And not just of the token ribbon-cutting
ceremonies, but of real hard-hitting news that matters to the public.
Deals like the Hawaii agreement have happened in Peoria, Ill., and Syracuse, N.Y., with independent news stations folding their operations into larger news-generating entities.
Whether we call it media consolidation or "news sharing," one thing
is clear: gutting newsrooms, slashing reporting jobs and centralizing
editorial power takes us further away from the quality journalism we
need to function in a thriving democracy.
The FCC's request for more information from Raycom is the first step
in examining these agreements. The commission shouldn't let media
consolidation happen through the backdoor, regardless of what it's
called.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 In These Times
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
Television broadcasters in the Aloha State have been quietly embarking on an underhanded media merger for more than a year.
In August, the CBS, NBC and MyNetwork affiliates in Honolulu
announced that they were folding into one of the "largest television
news operations" in Hawaii, combining the stations' staff and
newsrooms. The three news stations will now be housed in the same
place, sharing reporters and editorial ideas, but they will broadcast
from separate channels, appearing as distinct entities to viewers.
Nearly 70 employees from the stations will lose their jobs.
The consolidated operation will be controlled by one company: Raycom
Media. Raycom is among the nation's largest broadcasters, with 46
television stations in 36 markets and 18 states. The company has been
careful not to call the deal "media consolidation," instead referring
to it as an innocuous "Shared Services Agreement." Raycom says the arrangement will save struggling news stations.
But one public interest organization in Hawaii isn't buying Raycom's
PR spin. In September, the nonprofit group Media Council Hawaii,
represented by Georgetown University's Institute for Public
Representation, filed an official complaint
(PDF link) with the Federal Communications Commission. The complaint
alleges that because Raycom will effectively control the local news
programming, personnel and finances of all three stations, the
agreement is actually an illegal license transfer that violates FCC
local television ownership rules.
The FCC followed up on the complaint earlier this month by
requesting additional information about the agreements from the
broadcast stations and Raycom. In response, Media Council Hawaii
reiterated its concerns: "If the Commission does not act promptly to
stop this...run around its ownership limits, stations all over the
country that are experiencing financial difficulties will enter into
similar arrangements."
Bypassing federal law
The FCC's longstanding local television ownership rules prohibit an
entity from controlling two top-four stations or more than two stations
in the same area. The rules exist for a reason: to protect competition
and viewpoint diversity in local communities.
It's important that TV stations keep their news operations separate
to ensure that viewers get varying information and viewpoints. We want
media to compete for our eyeballs by serving up quality reporting.
Already, media consolidation has led to disastrous results
for news in communities. As more and more absentee corporations have
gobbled up TV stations in the pursuit of profit, local news has become
increasingly cookie-cutter. News segments focus on cheap and easily
produced programming. If we've learned anything from media
consolidation to date, it's that it degrades investigative journalism
and quality reporting.
Raycom argues that its local news sharing doesn't violate ownership
rules because there was no "official" transfer of licenses. "We do not
need any regulatory approvals," Paul McTear, the company's CEO, told KITV.com.
In reality, Raycom will control three stations serving Honolulu, two
of which are among the capital's top four stations. Hawaiians will get
fewer reporters on the beat, with one company deciding what gets on the
air.
"Better coverage" for communities, as Raycom suggests? Hardly. Sounds like covert consolidation to me.
'Inroads' into quality coverage
Local news sharing agreements aren't just cropping up in Hawaii. In
an attempt to cut costs, dozens of broadcast stations are now pooling
news video. NBC, Tribune Broadcasting, and CBS are just a few of the
media giants involved in similar agreements.
In May, three local TV stations in Washington, D.C., announced they
were reducing expenses by pooling video of breaking news. "We're in an
economic time when [we] have to look for every efficiency we can,"
Duffy Dyer, general manager of one of the stations, told the Washington Post.
"It's never made a great deal of sense to have 15 cameras at some
scheduled news event or ribbon-cutting. This is a good place to start
making some inroads."
But where do these "inroads" lead? Dyer downplays the real
ramifications of trimmed and consolidated news gathering operations:
Fewer camera people on the streets and reporters on beats means we get
less news coverage, period. And not just of the token ribbon-cutting
ceremonies, but of real hard-hitting news that matters to the public.
Deals like the Hawaii agreement have happened in Peoria, Ill., and Syracuse, N.Y., with independent news stations folding their operations into larger news-generating entities.
Whether we call it media consolidation or "news sharing," one thing
is clear: gutting newsrooms, slashing reporting jobs and centralizing
editorial power takes us further away from the quality journalism we
need to function in a thriving democracy.
The FCC's request for more information from Raycom is the first step
in examining these agreements. The commission shouldn't let media
consolidation happen through the backdoor, regardless of what it's
called.
Megan Tady
Megan Tady runs Word-Lift, a consulting and copywriting service in western Massachusetts. Previously, she was Campaign Coordinator for Free Press. Prior to joining Free Press, Megan was a national political reporter for In These Times, The New Standard, and worked extensively as a freelance journalist.
Television broadcasters in the Aloha State have been quietly embarking on an underhanded media merger for more than a year.
In August, the CBS, NBC and MyNetwork affiliates in Honolulu
announced that they were folding into one of the "largest television
news operations" in Hawaii, combining the stations' staff and
newsrooms. The three news stations will now be housed in the same
place, sharing reporters and editorial ideas, but they will broadcast
from separate channels, appearing as distinct entities to viewers.
Nearly 70 employees from the stations will lose their jobs.
The consolidated operation will be controlled by one company: Raycom
Media. Raycom is among the nation's largest broadcasters, with 46
television stations in 36 markets and 18 states. The company has been
careful not to call the deal "media consolidation," instead referring
to it as an innocuous "Shared Services Agreement." Raycom says the arrangement will save struggling news stations.
But one public interest organization in Hawaii isn't buying Raycom's
PR spin. In September, the nonprofit group Media Council Hawaii,
represented by Georgetown University's Institute for Public
Representation, filed an official complaint
(PDF link) with the Federal Communications Commission. The complaint
alleges that because Raycom will effectively control the local news
programming, personnel and finances of all three stations, the
agreement is actually an illegal license transfer that violates FCC
local television ownership rules.
The FCC followed up on the complaint earlier this month by
requesting additional information about the agreements from the
broadcast stations and Raycom. In response, Media Council Hawaii
reiterated its concerns: "If the Commission does not act promptly to
stop this...run around its ownership limits, stations all over the
country that are experiencing financial difficulties will enter into
similar arrangements."
Bypassing federal law
The FCC's longstanding local television ownership rules prohibit an
entity from controlling two top-four stations or more than two stations
in the same area. The rules exist for a reason: to protect competition
and viewpoint diversity in local communities.
It's important that TV stations keep their news operations separate
to ensure that viewers get varying information and viewpoints. We want
media to compete for our eyeballs by serving up quality reporting.
Already, media consolidation has led to disastrous results
for news in communities. As more and more absentee corporations have
gobbled up TV stations in the pursuit of profit, local news has become
increasingly cookie-cutter. News segments focus on cheap and easily
produced programming. If we've learned anything from media
consolidation to date, it's that it degrades investigative journalism
and quality reporting.
Raycom argues that its local news sharing doesn't violate ownership
rules because there was no "official" transfer of licenses. "We do not
need any regulatory approvals," Paul McTear, the company's CEO, told KITV.com.
In reality, Raycom will control three stations serving Honolulu, two
of which are among the capital's top four stations. Hawaiians will get
fewer reporters on the beat, with one company deciding what gets on the
air.
"Better coverage" for communities, as Raycom suggests? Hardly. Sounds like covert consolidation to me.
'Inroads' into quality coverage
Local news sharing agreements aren't just cropping up in Hawaii. In
an attempt to cut costs, dozens of broadcast stations are now pooling
news video. NBC, Tribune Broadcasting, and CBS are just a few of the
media giants involved in similar agreements.
In May, three local TV stations in Washington, D.C., announced they
were reducing expenses by pooling video of breaking news. "We're in an
economic time when [we] have to look for every efficiency we can,"
Duffy Dyer, general manager of one of the stations, told the Washington Post.
"It's never made a great deal of sense to have 15 cameras at some
scheduled news event or ribbon-cutting. This is a good place to start
making some inroads."
But where do these "inroads" lead? Dyer downplays the real
ramifications of trimmed and consolidated news gathering operations:
Fewer camera people on the streets and reporters on beats means we get
less news coverage, period. And not just of the token ribbon-cutting
ceremonies, but of real hard-hitting news that matters to the public.
Deals like the Hawaii agreement have happened in Peoria, Ill., and Syracuse, N.Y., with independent news stations folding their operations into larger news-generating entities.
Whether we call it media consolidation or "news sharing," one thing
is clear: gutting newsrooms, slashing reporting jobs and centralizing
editorial power takes us further away from the quality journalism we
need to function in a thriving democracy.
The FCC's request for more information from Raycom is the first step
in examining these agreements. The commission shouldn't let media
consolidation happen through the backdoor, regardless of what it's
called.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.