May 08, 2009
The continuing saga of the Pentagon pundit program just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser, as Alice in Wonderland might say.
From 2002 to 2008, the Defense Department
secretly cultivated more than 70 retired military officers who
frequently serve as media commentators. Initially, the goal was to use
them as "message force multipliers," to bolster the Bush administration's Iraq War sell job. That went so well that the covert program to shape U.S. public opinion -- an illegal effort, by any reasonable reading of the law -- was expanded to spin everything from then-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's job performance to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan to the Guantanamo Bay detention center to warrantless wiretapping.
In April 2008, shortly after the New York Times first reported on the Pentagon's pundits -- an in-depth expose that recently won the Times' David Barstow his second Pulitzer Prize -- the Pentagon suspended the program. In January 2009, the Defense Department Inspector General's office released a report claiming "there was an 'insufficient basis' to conclude that the program had violated laws." Representative Paul Hodes, one of the program's many Congressional critics, called the Inspector General's report "a whitewash."
Now, it seems as though the Pentagon agrees.
On May 5, the Defense Department Inspector General's office
announced that it was withdrawing its report on the Pentagon pundit
program, even removing the file from its website. (You can still
download the report from our website by clicking here or using the link at the end of this article.)
"Shortly after publishing the report ... we became aware of inaccuracies in the data," states the "withdrawal memo" (pdf)
from the Inspector General's office. The office's internal review of
the report -- which it has "refused to release," according to the Times
-- "concluded that the report did not meet accepted quality standards."
The report relied on "insufficient or inconclusive" evidence, the memo
admits. In addition, "former senior [Defense Department] officials who
devised and managed" the Pentagon pundit program -- including Victoria Clarke and Lawrence DiRita -- "refused our requests for an interview."
While the Inspector General's "highly unusual" about-face is
welcome, it gets us no closer to accountability. "Additional
investigative work will not be undertaken," the withdrawal memo states,
because the Pentagon pundit program "has been terminated and
responsible senior officials" -- such as Allison Barber -- "are no longer employed by the Department."
Of course, accountability for the Pentagon pundit program was never
likely to come from the Defense Department itself. Now it's up to
Congress to demand -- and the Government Accountability Office and the Federal Communications Commission to carry out -- real investigations into the elaborate propaganda campaign.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The continuing saga of the Pentagon pundit program just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser, as Alice in Wonderland might say.
From 2002 to 2008, the Defense Department
secretly cultivated more than 70 retired military officers who
frequently serve as media commentators. Initially, the goal was to use
them as "message force multipliers," to bolster the Bush administration's Iraq War sell job. That went so well that the covert program to shape U.S. public opinion -- an illegal effort, by any reasonable reading of the law -- was expanded to spin everything from then-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's job performance to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan to the Guantanamo Bay detention center to warrantless wiretapping.
In April 2008, shortly after the New York Times first reported on the Pentagon's pundits -- an in-depth expose that recently won the Times' David Barstow his second Pulitzer Prize -- the Pentagon suspended the program. In January 2009, the Defense Department Inspector General's office released a report claiming "there was an 'insufficient basis' to conclude that the program had violated laws." Representative Paul Hodes, one of the program's many Congressional critics, called the Inspector General's report "a whitewash."
Now, it seems as though the Pentagon agrees.
On May 5, the Defense Department Inspector General's office
announced that it was withdrawing its report on the Pentagon pundit
program, even removing the file from its website. (You can still
download the report from our website by clicking here or using the link at the end of this article.)
"Shortly after publishing the report ... we became aware of inaccuracies in the data," states the "withdrawal memo" (pdf)
from the Inspector General's office. The office's internal review of
the report -- which it has "refused to release," according to the Times
-- "concluded that the report did not meet accepted quality standards."
The report relied on "insufficient or inconclusive" evidence, the memo
admits. In addition, "former senior [Defense Department] officials who
devised and managed" the Pentagon pundit program -- including Victoria Clarke and Lawrence DiRita -- "refused our requests for an interview."
While the Inspector General's "highly unusual" about-face is
welcome, it gets us no closer to accountability. "Additional
investigative work will not be undertaken," the withdrawal memo states,
because the Pentagon pundit program "has been terminated and
responsible senior officials" -- such as Allison Barber -- "are no longer employed by the Department."
Of course, accountability for the Pentagon pundit program was never
likely to come from the Defense Department itself. Now it's up to
Congress to demand -- and the Government Accountability Office and the Federal Communications Commission to carry out -- real investigations into the elaborate propaganda campaign.
The continuing saga of the Pentagon pundit program just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser, as Alice in Wonderland might say.
From 2002 to 2008, the Defense Department
secretly cultivated more than 70 retired military officers who
frequently serve as media commentators. Initially, the goal was to use
them as "message force multipliers," to bolster the Bush administration's Iraq War sell job. That went so well that the covert program to shape U.S. public opinion -- an illegal effort, by any reasonable reading of the law -- was expanded to spin everything from then-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's job performance to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan to the Guantanamo Bay detention center to warrantless wiretapping.
In April 2008, shortly after the New York Times first reported on the Pentagon's pundits -- an in-depth expose that recently won the Times' David Barstow his second Pulitzer Prize -- the Pentagon suspended the program. In January 2009, the Defense Department Inspector General's office released a report claiming "there was an 'insufficient basis' to conclude that the program had violated laws." Representative Paul Hodes, one of the program's many Congressional critics, called the Inspector General's report "a whitewash."
Now, it seems as though the Pentagon agrees.
On May 5, the Defense Department Inspector General's office
announced that it was withdrawing its report on the Pentagon pundit
program, even removing the file from its website. (You can still
download the report from our website by clicking here or using the link at the end of this article.)
"Shortly after publishing the report ... we became aware of inaccuracies in the data," states the "withdrawal memo" (pdf)
from the Inspector General's office. The office's internal review of
the report -- which it has "refused to release," according to the Times
-- "concluded that the report did not meet accepted quality standards."
The report relied on "insufficient or inconclusive" evidence, the memo
admits. In addition, "former senior [Defense Department] officials who
devised and managed" the Pentagon pundit program -- including Victoria Clarke and Lawrence DiRita -- "refused our requests for an interview."
While the Inspector General's "highly unusual" about-face is
welcome, it gets us no closer to accountability. "Additional
investigative work will not be undertaken," the withdrawal memo states,
because the Pentagon pundit program "has been terminated and
responsible senior officials" -- such as Allison Barber -- "are no longer employed by the Department."
Of course, accountability for the Pentagon pundit program was never
likely to come from the Defense Department itself. Now it's up to
Congress to demand -- and the Government Accountability Office and the Federal Communications Commission to carry out -- real investigations into the elaborate propaganda campaign.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.