Common Dreams NewsCenter
Gore Vidal's Article of Impeachment
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
Don't Vote For The Lesser Of 2 Evils -- Vote Green
Published on Wednesday, September 20, 2000 in the San Francisco Chronicle
Don't Vote For The Lesser Of 2 Evils -- Vote Green
by Lisa Martinovic
 
I AM A REGISTERED Democrat. And I'm not proud. For more than 20 years, I've resigned myself to voting for a predictable parade of ever less palatable rich white men whose party line with every subsequent election more closely resembles that of their Republican counterparts. True, my personal politics lie slightly to the left of the Democratic Party's; ours is a joyless marriage of convenience that has never been consummated.

But I vote Democrat for the same reason millions of other disgruntled lefties do: because the Republicans are even worse. And we all know that the Greens don't have a snowball's chance in a D.C. summer of getting elected, and a vote for Ralph Nader is a vote for George W. Bush, blah, blah, blah. Friends, when are we all going to stand up and refuse to vote for the lesser of two weasels?

Oh, I've heard all the arguments. And certainly, the prospect of a Bush presidency is more chilling than one with Al Gore at the helm. But there's a saying I learned in my spiritual practice that is as applicable to politics as to personal growth: If you keep doing what you've always done, you'll keep getting what you've always gotten. What we've gotten is increasingly rotten.

There is only one candidate with the courage to stand up to the corporate Goliath. Nader's been doing it successfully for over 30 years. While Gore and Bush flap their gums about campaign finance reform, Nader is the only one walking the walk by refusing corporate hush money: He accepts contributions from individuals only. No PAC money, no soft money, just people donating no more than the legal limit of $2,000 apiece.

Others, who might be inclined to vote for Nader, wonder about his leadership abilities. In three decades of public service, Nader has built a social movement from the inchoate yearnings of a people trampled by mainstream politics. This man began with a vision and a constituency of those of us who want to lead safer, healthier, longer lives.

And with his leadership and grass-roots support, Nader demanded that our government serve her people -- and helped structure the institutions required to implement change. Today, we have Nader and his dedicated raiders to thank for environmental protections, better citizen access to government, and cars that are a lot safer than they would be if it were up to the big boys in Detroit. Nader has other visions that I and most Americans would love to support -- developing renewable energy, waging peace, strengthening labor laws and getting corporations off the public dole.

Is anyone but Nader talking about the decline in real wages, the escalation of child poverty, environmental racism, and the implications of the fact that consumer debt is higher than ever? But we don't have to live in fear any more. We have a choice. We can and we must vote from a genuine sense of felt passion and hope, vote for someone we believe in, someone who shares our vision for the future of our country, our Earth, our very humanity. Can Ralph Nader win? He can if everyone who believes in the principles that Nader both serves and embodies -- default Democrats, floundering Republicans and all those who feel disenfranchised -- vote.

I have a dream that some day we will all cast our ballots for the person we know to be the best candidate -- not merely in the one likely to defeat our worst fears. If not now, when?

Lisa Martinovic lives, writes and votes in San Francisco.

©2000 San Francisco Chronicle

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org