Common Dreams NewsCenter
Gore Vidal's Article of Impeachment
 
     
 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
A Baby Sitter for Junior
Published on Wednesday, July 26, 2000 in the New York Times
A Baby Sitter for Junior
by Maureen Dowd
 
WASHINGTON -- In Bushworld, it's always Day 41 of Desert Storm, that glorious day the president's approval ratings soared toward 91.

The head-scratching choice of Dick Cheney is explained by the fact that he was in the bunker during the family's finest hour. They would have preferred Colin Powell, who was also in the bunker during their finest hour. But they let Brent Scowcroft, who was also in the bunker during their finest hour, help seal the deal for Mr. Cheney.

It's impossible to work up even a solitary goosebump for a former staff member in the Ford White House. A prosperous, well-fed, balding, bland, male Republican Washington insider and former House leader who voted to the right of the N.R.A. and Newt Gingrich.

In Congress, Mr. Cheney was way, way out there, always willing to pony up money to guerrillas in Nicaragua and Angola but not to poor women whose lives were endangered by their pregnancies.

When Trent Lott starts gushing about somebody, Katie bar the door.

The Texas governor who promised to be a "different kind of Republican," the candidate who used words like "inclusive" and "compassionate" and "heart," is now running with a guy who defended cop-killer bullets and plastic guns that could slip through airport metal detectors.

Million moms will love that.

The Bush convention in Philadelphia will be gauzy, trying to appeal to women, moderates and minorities, showcasing Elizabeth Dole, Condoleezza Rice (also in the bunker at the finest hour), John McCain, General Powell and Laura Bush. The opening theme is "Leave no child behind." It will be delicious to see how the Republicans deal with those Cheney votes against Head Start.

"Inclusive" loses a little punch when you are running with someone who in 1986 opposed a call to release Nelson Mandela after 23 years in prison, and often voted against the economic sanctions that helped crush apartheid.

The Cheney choice is about the past. But then, W.'s campaign has always been less about vision than vindication.

The dauphin must reclaim the throne because the Bushes must restore the halcyon days of the ruling-class court that thrived before that dissolute commoner Bill Clinton usurped it.

The family yearns to go back to the "honorable" days, the golden era of Establishment reign -- before the decision not to go into Baghdad began to fester, before Bill Clinton stole credit for the thrumming economy, before first ladies went all weird on us.

Mr. Cheney was picked because he is the anti-Quayle. George I was determined that George II not repeat his mistake, choosing someone young and callow. The ticket already had that covered.

Back in 1988 Mr. Cheney, then a House luminary, would have been a good choice for George I. For George II, he comes across as the baby sitter.

Mr. Cheney has been minding Junior all year -- first coaching him in foreign affairs, then helping him sort through his V.P. picks, and now stepping in to provide a steady hand on the tiller.

The past dictated the choice in this way as well: W., who had loafed through long years when he could have been prepping for the presidency, felt he needed some heaviness on the ticket.

The Bushes hate being "psychoanalyzed," as they call it. They don't like personal questions. And yet they make many crucial decisions based on personality.

The father chose Dan Quayle and the son chose Dick Cheney for the same reason: They wanted men who liked them, men with whom they had "a comfort level."

And while Mr. Cheney might have voted like Tom DeLay, he has a calm and avuncular air. He vetted the other candidates, but he himself was vetted by W. and Poppy, who, as usual, trusted their instincts.

I doubt either Bush would have felt comfortable running with a woman. Or with anyone who challenged their egos or made waves, like John McCain. They need a history of loyalty, and they have a preference for deference.

Dick Cheney is one of their guys, in the Club. And they know best.

Before the Bushes mess up any more vice-presidential picks, for Jeb or George P., they might want to stop checking their gut and start checking the voting record.

A ticket with two rich white Texas oilmen who went to Yale, avoided Vietnam and act more moderate than they are? For the Bushes, that's a perfect fit.

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org