Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives
   
 
   Featured Views  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
UN's 'Women 2000': The World's Women Still Face a Tough Road
Published on Friday, June 9, 2000 in Newsday
UN's 'Women 2000':
The World's Women Still Face a Tough Road
by Sheryl McCarthy
 
IT WAS exciting to see the General Assembly of the United Nations filled almost entirely with women this week.

Wearing tailored suits and pumps, work dresses and high heels, roomy pants and comfortable shoes, filmy Indian saris and billowing African robes and headdresses, nearly 10,000 women delegates and some men from more than 180 countries attended a weeklong special session of the General Assembly known as "Women 2000." Five years after the international women's conference in Beijing put women's rights on the world's radar screen, women from places as obscure as the Republic of Moldova and as notorious as Zimbabwe reassembled to measure how much progress they've made, and how short they've fallen of their goals.

A surprising number of delegates hold high-ranking government jobs.

Wandira Kazibwe, vice president of Uganda; Deputy Prime Minister Laurette Onkelinx of Belgium, and Onechanh Thammavong, vice president of the Lao national assembly, were among the delegates who addressed the conference yesterday.

Some countries we consider Third World seem to have more women in top government posts than some of the more developed countries. India, Pakistan, Great Britain and Israel have all had female heads of state, while the United States can't seem to get beyond white males.

So, has the condition of the world's women improved since Beijing? The bottom line is that women are still catching hell all over the world. Despite the platform for action signed by 180 countries in Beijing, in India baby girls are still aborted or killed after delivery, and women are still murdered because their families can't pay their dowries.

In Bangladesh, hundreds of women a year are burned with acid by scorned husbands or lovers. In many African countries, girls are still subjected to genital mutilation.

In Iran, women still wear the chador in public and in Afghanistan, well, forget Afghanistan. Under the fanatical Taliban, women and girls can be beaten or killed for going to school or leaving the house.

In countries all over the world, women and children make up the majority of the poor, and girls are the majority of children not attending school.

The basis of the Beijing agreement was that its signers would revoke all their laws that discriminated against women.

Five years later, however, 12-year-old girls can still be legally married off in Colombia, dowries are required in Sudan, husbands are the legal heads of households in Turkey and Yemen and wives are required to obey them; Kuwaiti women are barred from voting; French women (at least on paper) are barred from working at night; in Nepal, only male children can inherit property; and in Ethiopia, rape isn't a crime if the rapist marries his victim.

Meanwhile, in the United States, domestic violence is a huge problem and there's still a wage gap. On the upside, every delegate who spoke yesterday told of improvements in women's lives.

In Uganda, official documents must now refer to "she" as well as "he." More than 3 million girls are now in primary school, compared with 800,000 three years ago, and women now account for 30 percent of local government officials.

There's been progress. But, as speaker after speaker confirmed, poverty, limited access to education, lack of economic independence, patriachal traditions, lack of medical care, exposure to HIV and AIDS, and a growing world traffic in women for prostitution and slavery plague the lives of millions of women.

Delegates to "Women 2000" are debating a new document that will outline where their countries need to go in the next five years. But, amid all the talk about documents, protocols, resolutions, policies and statements of principles, one feels that they're a substitute for action.

"What we've been hearing is a lot of rhetoric from the government delegates," says Monique Widyono, co-executive director of Equality Now, an international women's rights group based in New York City.

"They're just negotiating words," she says. "We've done all of this before." What women need from these governments now, she says, is "clear political will and commitment. Why in the year 2000 are we still negotiating over the need to eliminate discriminatory laws?" Why indeed?

Copyright Newsday, Inc.

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org
Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community.
Independent, non-profit newscenter since 1997.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.