Leaving
the United States and visiting other countries gives one a very different sense
of how the country is perceived than one would ever gather from the established
media here at home. It puts things into perspective and forces anyone with an
open mind to think about some very big questions. During a recent visit to
South Africa, this observation was reaffirmed. What struck me more than anything
else was the fear of the potential future actions of the U.S. government. While
virtually everyone I encountered had concluded a long time ago that President
Bush is simply out of control and represents a danger to the future survival of
this planet, this did not mean that they saw in John Kerry the coming of the savior.
Rather, and time again, people would simply say that they did not know whether
the planet could survive another four years of Bush.
The comments actually
went far deeper than one might at first gather. The concern about the U.S. went
beyond the personality and actions of any one individual, or for that matter,
any one administration. What they spoke to was a growing distrust of the objectives,
and indeed, the word of the U.S.A. Specifically, did the U.S. government and the
people of U.S. more generally, understand that something needed to change in the
way that this country relates to the rest of the planet?
In South Africa I
was regularly asked about U.S. foreign policy matters that most of us here either
conveniently ignore or are unaware of entirely. I was asked about what ever happened
to President Bush's alleged commitment to contribute substantial assistance to
the fight against HIV/AIDS? I was certainly asked again and again about the Iraq
war. I was asked about what will happen to post-coup Haiti, which seems to be
in a state of perpetual and low-intensity civil war, usually with some degree
of U.S. involvement.
What struck me in this visit, however, was a question
that was posed to me by a South African college student. She wanted to know what
it would take for the people of the United States to realize how the U.S. is viewed
overseas. She asked, in a very serious tone, at what point will people in the
U.S.A. refuse to accept the rationales offered to us by various administration
for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries?
In all honesty,
I had a very qualified answer. I pointed out that the emergence of an anti-war
movement prior to the U.S. aggression against Iraq was a very good sign, but that
it was absolutely the case that too many people in the U.S.A. have surrounded
themselves with a bubble through which they often refuse to receive information
about the outside world. Perhaps, I suggested, the truth about the implications
of U.S. foreign policy is too painful for us to accept. Perhaps we fear that should
we face reality that it will be the equivalent of looking into the face of the
Gorgon, turning us into stone.
The South African student considered my words,
and prior to walking off to her class commented that at some point we, the people
of the U.S.A. will be judged based upon the leaders we choose. At some point,
she offered, there is something called accountability. Fear of the USA by the
rest of the world does not make for a very stable, let alone peaceful situation.
At some point the resentment will boil over.
As the student headed off, I was
left standing there wondering something strange: Are the people of the USA perceived
as being those who believe that if we do not hear a tree falling in a distant
forest, then that must mean that the tree has not fallen?
Bill Fletcher
Jr. is president of TransAfrica Forum, a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit educational
and organizing center formed to raise awareness in the United States about issues
facing the nations and peoples of Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America. He
also is co-chair of the anti-war coalition, United for Peace and Justice (www.unitedforpeace.org).
He can be reached at bfletcher@transafricaforum.org.
©
2004 The Sacramento Observer
###