EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Corporate Socialism: How Employers Skim Workers' Tax Dollars
Across the United States more than 2,700 companies are collecting state income taxes from hundreds of thousands of workers – and are keeping the money with the states’ approval, says an eye-opening report published on Thursday.
The report from Good Jobs First, a nonprofit taxpayer watchdog organization funded by Ford, Surdna and other major foundations, identifies 16 states that let companies divert some or all of the state income taxes deducted from workers’ paychecks. None of the states requires notifying the workers, whose withholdings are treated as taxes they paid.
General Electric, Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, Chrysler, Ford, General Motors and AMC Theatres enjoy deals to keep state taxes deducted from their workers’ paychecks, the report shows. Foreign companies also enjoy such arrangements, including Electrolux, Nissan, Toyota and a host of Canadian, Japanese and European banks, Good Jobs First says.
Why do state governments do this? Public records show that large companies often pay little or no state income tax in states where they have large operations, as this column has documented. Some companies get discounts on property, sales and other taxes. So how to provide even more subsidies without writing a check? Simple. Let corporations keep the state income taxes deducted from their workers’ paychecks for up to 25 years.
It was not always this way. Letting companies keep their workers’ state taxes apparently began in Kentucky two decades ago as a way to retain jobs.
Last July when I wrote about six big companies that pocket Illinois state taxes I knew there was more to this. But I had no idea how pervasive these diversions were until I read an advance copy of the 39-page report by Good Jobs First.

Corporate Socialism
Deals cut with the states over the past two decades diverted $5.5 billion from public purposes to private gain, the report says. Close to $700 million more was diverted last year, Good Jobs First estimates.
New Jersey approved $73.2 million in new deals in 2011 on top of $178 million diverted that year alone under previous deals. I calculate that at nearly $80 per household in corporate welfare based on New Jersey’s 3.1 million households.
These deals typify corporate socialism, in which business gains are privatized and costs socialized. They also mean government picks winners and losers, interfering with competitive markets. Leaders in both parties embrace these giveaways because they draw campaign donations from corporate interests and votes from people who do not understand that they are subsidizing huge companies.
Michael Press, a Connecticut consultant on tax incentives, says such deals, however troubling, are an inevitable result of the U.S. Constitution setting up competition between the states.
“In an ideal world we would not provide any corporate subsidies,” Press told me. “It looks like corruption. But if you do it right, if you only target those companies whose behavior you change to create jobs or keep jobs in your state then these targeted temporary arrangements are cheaper – much cheaper – and can be more effective than an overall reduction in tax rates.”
The mission of Good Jobs First is making economic development subsidies accountable and effective. In years of working with their data I have always found it sound. While Greg LeRoy, Good Jobs First’s founder, has rooted out all sorts of hidden subsidies over the years, he emphasizes that he is not inherently hostile to them, only to secrecy, waste and what he calls job piracy and job blackmail.
“Job piracy” occurs when one state diverts taxes to lure an employer across state lines. AMC Entertainment announced a deal last year to move its corporate headquarters from Kansas City, Mo., to a nearby Kansas suburb. In return, Good Jobs First said, Kansas will let the multiplex chain keep $47 million of state income taxes withheld from its workers’ paychecks, a drain on public finances that did not create any jobs, but does enrich the Wall Street firms that own AMC including arms of J. P. Morgan, Apollo Management, Bain Capital and the Carlyle Group. AMC declined to answer my questions.
“Job blackmail” occurs when a company threatens to close a plant unless it gets tax money.
In Illinois, the law requires companies to threaten to leave before they can keep taxes withheld from paychecks. Motorola Mobility, now being acquired by Google; the truck maker Navistar; the German manufacturer Continental Tire, and three auto makers – Chrysler, Ford and Mitsubishi – get to keep $346.8 in taxes over 10 years because they threatened to leave Illinois. Navistar can pocket $62.1 million even if it fires a quarter of its Illinois workforce, its contract shows. A recent deal gives Sears $150 million, Good Jobs First reported.

Promises of Jobs
Promising to retain jobs can be lucrative. General Electric invested $126 million updating part of its Ohio operations. In return, GE gets a tax credit equal to $115.3 million of its worker taxes, recovering 92 percent of its investment. A sweet deal for GE, but not its competitors.
Gary Sheffer, GE’s top spokesman, said the company told its workers about the deal. In all, he said, GE is investing around $300 million in Ohio and “the resulting taxes the state will receive will far exceed the tax credits provided to GE.”
That response, I think, misses the point – GE should pay its own bills without taking welfare.
Many figures in the Good Jobs First report are from disclosure reports some states make. Others come from news accounts and company announcements.
Total revenue losses are higher than the report states. First, some states hide the costs. Phil Mattera, the research director at Good Jobs First, said he lists the cost as zero for states that hide the numbers.
Good Jobs First wants to end these diversions, but failing that recommends mandatory disclosure to the workers as the first reform. I concur. It’s the first step in ending corporate welfare as we know it.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


23 Comments so far
Show AllTo get the graphics of this article I had to go to Reuters. This is the link from the top of the page. Here it is again. Need to see the graphs.
http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/04/12/taxed-by-the-boss/
Johnson has been working for decades on this issue and has written a couple of books. He has the top tax expert at NY Times for years, maybe decades.
The fact that he is shocked by this new revelation is very significant. He has been on top of the issues all along.
Shame on the author for calling it "corporate socialism" which is a very misleading euphemism for fascism.
It is Corporate welfare, and it is fascism.
So not only do we give these companies tax breaks we also pay what amounts to "protection" money. And some think the "mob" is dead. They've just morphed.
Better veneer, better tailors.
Johnston documents one more huge ugliness on Chis Christie's record in New Jersey. Check out the Krugman story to see even more. Christie is seen as one of the republican leaders in the US. The horrors that have overtaken the US begin with trash like Christie.
This is NOT the definition of Socialism.
The Corporation or wealthy taking the excess wealth that is created by labor is CAPITALISM.
Welfare was originally defined as propserity and happiness. It then took on the meaning of helping people IN NEED. Giving money to the Corporation is not welfare.
The problem I have with this author as I have with so many is they seek to redefine socialism and welfare as dirty words and is part and parcel as to why people in the Uniteed States of America have no real understanding of Socialism.
One more time.
Taking money from the laborer in the way of taxes to give to the wealthiest (excess value of that workers labor) or in the way of a wages wherein the excess wealth the laborer produced (called profit) goes into the pockets of the wealthy is NOT SOCIALISM in any way shape or form.
It is how capitalism works. The enriching of the few of the expense of the many is what Socialism was designed to prevent.
Thank-you. We need to bury forever the phrase "corporate socialism". The proper term is "capitalist oligharchy", or "plutocracy".
Exactly! Well said.
While I agree, that both the concepts Socialism and Welfare are deceitfully conflated and abused as words, what the author explains is about SPECIFICALLY:
"business gains [that] are privatized and costs socialized."
You don't even use a capital 'C' on "how capitalism works," so it's clear that what goes for corrupting everything of value and returning empty promises, is hardly so clear EITHER anymore.
Perhaps "CORPORATE COMMUNISM" would be the double negative that is more appropriate, or better yet "CORPORATE STALINISM" ?
Like some disgusting terminal cancer, capitalism continues to adapt in ever more egregious ways in its blindly malevolent parasitism of everyone.
Let's just call it by what it does TO us (certainly not FOR us):
"G r e e d _ a t _ a n y _ C o s t "
We cannot sustainably afford either the "Greed" nor the "Costs," which include devastating our health, the Planet itself, and eroding if not eliminating Constitutionally guaranteed rights, security, freedom and our collective pursuit of happiness.
Both of you are incorrectly capitalizing lots of words. One does not capitalize "socialism", capitalism, or any oher "ism" unless it is part of the name of a political party
Thanks for that (nearly nothing) -- being a distraction -- and attempting to marginalize what's important to discuss.
As if your being a school marm scolding folks for irrelevant details means anything useful or is constructive ?
As if it were a capital crime, to "incorrectly [be] capitalizing lots of words," as grimly and starkly contrasted with actual warmongering mass murder and relentless suffering of tens of millions ?
I live in Illinois and I did not know any of this, I do know that yesterday WGN TV announced, in awe, that the CEO of Caterpillar received 14 million plus in compensation last year. This character is always threatening to move Caterpillar out Illinois unless he gets more goodies from the State and Union. The people here just accept this as the way things are done, que sera, sera.
This is pretty shocking. They pay the worker terrible wage, then rob them some more! an But don't wait for the corporate media to inform the public of this.
All sorts of abuse already existis. Millions of workers are illegally designated "1099 Employees" - the phrase itself a brazen admission that the employee is illegally classified as a "independent contractor" - but is unlikely to ever get caught by the understaffed IRS which is overwhelmed with these cases. This imediately saves the employer from paying the employer share of SS and Medicare tax, plus paying into workers compensation, and unemployment insurance - and relieves the employer from any complyance with all workplace wage, hour and safety laws - even minimum wage. The employee, already paid a pittance, is then required to pay the full share of the SS and medicare tax - 15.3 percent.
I have often wondered why pundits call policies against issues like education, Unions, Contraception and Abortion social conservatism. Isn't that an oxymoraon?
Columnist here
@ Don Utter, thank you.
To a number of others here: this is a serious issue and you respond with sophomoric comments about language choice? Get serious.
The use of language is of great importance. Read some Orwell.
There a reason Americans will carry a sign around while protesting "Socialism" that says "hands off My medicare" and it because so many do not understand the meaning of the word. They do not understand because it continually misused.
There a REASON the White house focuses so much on the language it uses over "serious" issues. When asked if they at war in Libya they referred to it as a "kinetic military action" Those that challenge the misuse of language are hardly sophmoric..
>>"When words lose their meaning , the people lose their freeedom" (Confucious)
May I suggest you google this:
"david cay" orwell
and then
"david cay" socialism
I write in language that helps people understand within their frame of reference.
I appreciate your efforts believe me and I do feel you are a person trying to expose all the lies told to us. We are very likely on the same side.
But I can not help but get worked up about the misuse of language and will continue to rail against it.
It is what turns the murder of children into "Collateral damage" and is what turns people defending their homes against the US Military into "terrorists".
I agree with much of what you say, but can not agree that the redistribution of wealth to the rich is "Socialism".
Its not "socialism" its "corporate socialism." Not the same thing.
Then there are those employers over the years who do withhold FICA (soc. security) and Medicare but don't turn over the money to the taxman, so when you "retire" your social security payment is below par.
-30-
No need for euphemisms or newspeak. Let's just call it what it is... Extortion. Give us tax breaks, freebies, and "get out of jail free" tickets or we will move out of your state and leave your workers S.O.L. No different than give me your lunch money or I will kick your ass.
What ever you want to call it, it is another example of enrichment of the few at the expense of the many..
But then again, you should just be thankful ,that they provide you with the opportunity to work, right? The American way!
Which was for those of you that don't know it, is a catch phase for an ad campaign put together for NAM ( National Association of Manufracturing) in the 1930's.
Might people be able to protest this by reducing their payroll withholding to zero and paying quarterly estimated payments directly to the Fed and State, as do self-employed persons?