EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The United State's Shameful Bahrain Policy
Bahraini anti-government protesters, protecting their faces from tear gas, carry national flags and a picture of jailed human rights activist Abdulhadi al-Khawaja at a protest on ApPril 4. (Credit: AP/Hasan Jamali) Behind the walls of a prison compound, the man who helped lead last year’s pro-democracy protests in Bahrain is continuing a lonely, painful battle for freedom away from the media spotlight. Abdulhadi AlKhawaja has endured beatings, torture and a life sentence handed down from a military court, all for the “crime” of advocating human rights and democracy in his country. In response to these injustices, on February 8th 2012 he initiated a hunger strike which he promised to continue until either his release or his death, and which he has now led into its 61st day. After refusing to eat for two full months in protest of his imprisonment and torture he remains defiant, but the limits of what his body can take are being reached. After literally fighting prison officials to visit him, an act for which she was also detained for several days, his daughter reported that Khawaja is experiencing difficulty breathing and appears to be near death. As she described her brief visit with her father, “His tone and the way he was speaking were like he was saying goodbye….we’re not sure if we’ll ever see him again.” On the eve of his sentencing last year to life imprisonment, in a trial described by Amnesty to be unfair and politically motivated, Khawaja had raised his fist and proclaimed his intention to “continue on the path of peaceful resistance”, a promise which he has steadfastly kept and which has today brought him to this breaking point.
While Khawaja continues to peacefully resist by whatever means in his power, the Bahraini regime continues to suppress with brute force the pro-democracy movement he helped spearhead. Despite its criminal abuse of a prominent human rights champion in the Arab world, and despite the documented instances of killings, torture, and indefinite imprisonment of countless other Bahraini citizens, the U.S. government continues to support the Al-Khalifa regime in the face of its democratic uprising and refuses to publicly call for the release of Alkhawaja and other pro-democracy activists. While the U.S. has consistently proclaimed its intention to champion the cause of democratic uprisings in the Middle East and around the world, there continues to be a policy of “business as usual” in its dealings with a Bahraini government which has moved aggressively to crush a peaceful citizens movement calling for democracy and respect for human rights. Indeed, while the regime was wrapping up a campaign of torture and murder directed at democracy activists, the U.S. lawmakers pursued a decision to resume arms sales to Bahrain, pushing forward a $53 million dollar sale of weaponry and other equipment to the country. In the midst of loud denunciations of the atrocities of Bashar Assad in Syria and coming on the heels of a military campaign ostensibly fought to protect the democratic uprising in Libya, the decision to not just support but to continue arming the Bahraini regime is one that flies in the face of stated U.S. priorities in the region. While several American officials are reported to have promised Bahraini activists that they would privately lobby for the rights of Khawaja and others who are suffering the abuses of the regime, the U.S. government has steadfastly declined to offer a public condemnation of the documented crimes of its Gulf ally, nor will it openly call on them to release Alkhawaja or any of the other detainees whom Amnesty International has designated to be prisoners of conscience.
Read the full article at Salon.com
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


7 Comments so far
Show AllNotice how Amerika's "hateful he-man", Hillary Clinton, has been silent on the Bahraini government's murder, tourture, and imprisonment of it's citizens who oppose the dictatorship? Even against the doctors and nurses who treated the injured protesters!
Oh, I forgot, our largest navy base in the Middle East is stationed there.
Gotta look the other way in the name of "homeland security."
Quite agree Peaceman, particularly when the people opposing the dictatorship are mainly Shia Muslims, who are being tortured and killed. I wonder if the US/UK support Bahrain, because it is trying to silence the Shia, seen as having possible links to Iran? Once we start to interfere/intervene in these countries we just tie ourselves in political knots, and the ordinary people of the Middle East see us for what we really are.
See this article by Tariq Ramadan:
http://gulfnews.com/opinions/columnists/the-salafist-equation-1.996976
"The US administration and other European countries are fully aware that Salafist organisations, based in Saudi Arabia, in Qatar or elsewhere in the Middle East, are pouring millions into ‘liberated countries’ and especially recently in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt (a RAND report has mentioned an impressive figure: $80 million (Dh294 million) invested before the elections for Egypt alone). Why, one wonders, do the western countries lend direct and indirect support to Islamist ideologies that are so obviously at odds with their own? "
"he Salafist resurgence is creating trouble and tension within the Sunni tradition and between Sunni and Shiite Muslims as well, as the latter are considered as deviant by the literalists. The Sunni-Shiite fracture in the Middle East is a critical factor in the region especially in light of western and Israeli threats against Iran and the ongoing repression in Syria. The divide is deep even with regard to the Palestinian resistance, which for years had been a unifying legitimate struggle among Muslims. Now division is the rule, within and without, as Salafist activism (which does not care so much about the Palestinian cause) deepens among the Sunnis as well as between Sunnis and the Shiites.
This strategic alliance with the Salafist literalists, on both religious and political grounds, is critical for the West as it is the most efficient way to keep the Middle East under control. Protecting some oil-rich states as well as their religious ideology while dividing any potential unifying political forces (such as alliances between secular and reformist Islamists or a popular front against Israeli policy) necessitates undermining the Muslim majority countries from within. "
AndyUK: I think the aims of the US/UK is to incite more hostility between the Shia and Sunni using the old "divide and conquer" tactic, in order squash all opposition for 21st century colonial control of the Middle East for the oil, gas, port facilities and shipping lanes. Look what happened to Libya. Iran is the world's third largest oil producer and the US/UK propaganda machine has been at it non-stop, psyching up the easily deceived public that Iran is a threat. And Israel wanting to bomb Iran?
Also, Tony Cartalucci has written a good article titled: "Bahrain: The Key To Saudi-Qatari Servitude" Go to:
http://www.globalresearch.org/index.php?context=va&aid=30251
American policy in Bahrein should come as no surprise. The policy of supporting brutal autocratic regimes is, in fact, standard US policy around the globe. Only in very rare instances does our government choose to support democratic insurgents.
Jim Shea
Jim Shea: So true!
Wouldn't hurt if CD corrected the spelling of 'United States' in the title of this piece.