EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's
- Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
Popular content
Today's Top News
Breaking Up with the Sierra Club
No right way is easy. . . .We must risk our lives to save them.
—John Muir, Sierra Club’s founder
Dear Sierra Club,
I’m through with you.
For years we had a great relationship based on mutual admiration. You gave a glowing review of my first book, Living Downstream—a review that appeared in the pages of Sierra magazine and hailed me as “the new Rachel Carson.” Since 1999 that phrase has linked us together in all the press materials that my publicist sends out. Your name appears with mine on the flaps of my book jackets, in the biography that introduces me at the speaker’s podium, and in the press release that announced, last fall, that I was one of the lucky recipients of a $100,000 Heinz Award for my research and writing on the environment.
I was proud to be affiliated with you. I hoped to live up to the moniker you bestowed upon me.
But more than a month has past since your executive director, Michael Brune, admitted in Time magazine that the Sierra Club had, between 2007 and 2010, clandestinely accepted $25 million from the fracking industry, with most of the donations coming from Chesapeake Energy. Corporate Crime Reporter was hot on the trail of the story when it broke in Time.
From the start, Brune’s declaration seemed less an acknowledgement of wrongdoing than an attempt to minister to a looming public relations problem. Would someone truly interested in atonement seek credit for choosing not to take additional millions of gas industry dollars (“Why the Sierra Club Turned Down $26 Million in Contributions from Natural Gas Interests”)?
Here, on top of the Marcellus Shale, along the border between Pennsylvania and New York—where we are surrounded by land leased to the gas industry; where we live in fear that our water will be ruined, our mortgages called in, our teenage children killed in fiery wrecks with 18-wheelers hauling toxic fracking waste on our rural, icy back roads; where we cash out our vacation days to board predawn buses to rallies and public hearings; where we fundraise, donate, testify, phone bank, lobby, submit public comments, sign up for trainings in nonviolent civil disobedience; where our children ask if we will be arrested, if we will have to move, if we will die, and what will happen to the bats, the honeybees, the black bears, the grapevines, the apple orchards, the cows’ milk; where we have learned all about casing failures, blow-outs, gas flares, clear-cuts, legal exemptions, the benzene content of production fluid, the radioactive content of drill cuttings; where people suddenly start sobbing in church and no one needs to ask why—here in the crosshairs of Chesapeake Energy, Michael Brune’s announcement was met with a kind of stunned confusion.
The Sierra Club had taken money, gobs of it, from an industry that we in the grassroots have been in the fight of our lives to oppose. The largest, most venerable environmental organization in the United States secretly aligned with the very company that seeks to occupy our land, turn it inside out, blow it apart, fill it with poison. All for the goal of extracting a powerful heat-trapping gas, methane, that plays a significant role in climate change.
Climate change: identified by The Lancet as the number-one global health problem of the 21st century. Children, according to the World Health Organization, are among its primary victims.
It was as if, on the eve of D-day, the anti-Fascist partisans had discovered that Churchill was actually in cahoots with the Axis forces.
So, I’ve had many weeks now to ponder the whole betrayal and watch for signs of redemption from Sierra Club’s national leadership. Would it be “coming clean” (to quote the title of the executive director’s recent book)?
Freed from the silence that money bought, would it now lend its voice in support of environmental groups in New York State that seek a statewide prohibition on fracking? Would it come to the aid of those in Pennsylvania calling for a halt to the devastation there?
Would it, at the very least, endorse the modest proposal of Physicians, Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy, who recommend a national moratorium on fracking until human health impacts are researched?
And would Michael Brune humbly ask forgiveness from antifracking activist Lisa Wright, formerly on the executive committee of the Sierra Club’s Finger Lakes chapter? As recently as last May, in response to a direct query from Wright, who had become suspicious, Brune wrote, “I do want to be clear about one thing: we do not receive any money from Aubrey McClendon, nor his company Chesapeake. For that matter, we do not receive any contributions from the natural gas industry. Hopefully this will alleviate some concerns.”
The answer to all of the above questions: No.
So, Sierra Club, call some other writer your new Rachel Carson. I’ll be erasing your endorsement from my website.
And take back these words, penned by your own fierce and uncorruptible founder, John Muir, that have hung for years by my writing desk:
Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature’s peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The wind will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves.
There is no peace in the mountains and hills over the Marcellus Shale. No glad tidings. The forests of Pennsylvania are filled with chainsaws, flares, drill pads, pipelines, condensers, generators, and the 24/7 roar of compressor stations. The wind that blows east from the gas fields carries toluene, benzene, and diesel exhaust. Sunshine turns it all into poisonous ozone. Storms send silt into trout streams from denuded hillsides and cause good people to lie awake at night, worried about overflowing impoundment pits full of neurotoxic chemicals and overturned frack trucks full of carcinogens.
Even now, plans are being laid to transport 88.2 million gallons of liquid propane and butane to caverns that lie beneath the idyllic New York lakeshore where my ten-year-old son was born. (“This transaction is yet another example of the successful execution on our plan to build an integrated natural gas storage and transportation hub in the Northeast,” says the company called Inergy.) When you tramp through the fields and forests where I live—40 percent of the land in my county is leased to the gas industry—cares don’t drop off like autumn leaves. They accumulate like convoys of flowback fluid laced with arsenic, radium, and barium with no place, no place to go.
And, yes, they are fracking in Rachel Carson’s beloved Allegheny County, too.
The hard truth: National Sierra Club served as the political cover for the gas industry and for the politicians who take their money and do their bidding. It had a hand in setting in motion the wheels of environmental destruction and human suffering. It was complicit in bringing extreme fossil fuel extraction onshore, into our communities, farmlands, and forests, and in blowing up the bedrock of our nation. And I can’t get over it.
So, here are some parting words from the former new Rachel Carson.
The path to salvation lies in reparations—not in accepting praise for overcoming the urge to commit the same crime twice. So shutter your doors. Cash out your assets. Don a backpack and hike through the gaslands of America. Along the way, bear witness. Apologize. Offer compensation to the people who have no drinkable water and can’t sell their homes. Whose farm ponds bubble with methane. Whose kids have nosebleeds and mysterious rashes. Write big checks to the people who are putting their bodies on the line in the fight to ban fracking, and to the grassroots groups that are organizing them.
Finally, go to Washington and say what the Sierra Club should have said in 2007: Fracking is not a bridge to the future. It is a plank on which we walk blindfolded at the point of a sword. There is no right way to do it. And the pirates are not our friends.
Sincerely,
Sandra Steingraber
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


65 Comments so far
Show AllThe Colorado Sierra Club enabled the Commanche III coal-fired power plant AND "our" Senator Mark Udall, who's sold out to coal, oil, gas and nuclear: http://spryeye.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-sen-mark-udall-environmmentalist-or.html
Like most of the environmentalists of the 1960s, they have received a better deal to leave a loosing cause ! The greenies supposedly fought the oil industry for decades and succeeded in making the owners of that industry incredibly wealthy while failing to slow the world wide effort to drill the planet dry. The final consensus showed no real change in the proliferation of petroleum products until the estimated world supplies passed their peak and the cost of all the wars to keep the taps flowing exceeded the benefits of the product. As in any Capitalist economy the Capitalist responded to a reduction in supply of one resource by allocating resources to develop a new market for another existing natural resource, Methane. As long as the majority of the people on this planet prefer the benefits of the current standard of living made available by this modern age over returning to the primitive existence of an 18th century life style, your complaints will remain a faint cry in the wilderness and some people will continue to play your game to get access to the wealth generated by a naive public who think they can really change the plans of the Oligarchs who own and run everything. Your time would be better spent fighting to eliminate a Capitalist form of economy !
The "greenies" have succeeded for decades in blocking areas around the world from drilling and exploitation. Assuming that nothing can be done is the attitude of folks who don't try or pay attention. As one small example, we still have whales swimming in our ocean as a direct result of Green Peace. Had they not started their efforts 40 years ago we would have an empty ocean.
This is not the first time I have read something disappointing about the Sierra Club. As a long time supporter of their efforts this article saddens me. It also reminds me that we live in a country that money is power and our ecosystem has minimal supporters trying to stop thousands of wealthy jackals. I cannot fault them for taking money from one organization to try to do more in other efforts. They are, no doubt, overwhelmed when faced with the Heritage Foundation and the Koch Brothers willingness to drop hundreds of millions on any miss-information campaign they wish including fracking,
Ah yes, the sins of the sierra club have found them out. Just another corporate take over that is quietly and stealthily and prearranged, side with the worst of the worse to the environment. Never ever leave out the ability of corporations to subvert anything that is good for their 'cash and carry' business ventures. Makes me wonder if any of the clubs, groups or others bent on fighting for environmentally sane policies and actions have NOT been infiltrated and subverted from within. Just as the new terrorist legislation allows for infiltration to not ferret out actual terrorist...no make that actual criminals but instead get those members to carry out contrary plans that makes the original seem to be very despicable. It is a way and has been done for millennia and yet they get away with it time after time.
I am struck by Ms Steingraber's harsh condemnation of the Sierra Club. Seems to me that Brune when he discovered the situation at the Club asked the former ED to depart from the organization and told McClendon to stick his millions. I am also puzzled at why Ms Steingraber wasn't raising these issues and concerns about fracking when VP Cheney unleashed the oil and gas gang on the Rocky Mountain West in 2001 to extract coal bed methane and deep gas. Interesting how only when large population centers in the East are affected to folks like her come out of the woodwork and shout for cessation of bad practices and condemnation of groups who made mistakes and are trying to rectify them.
It is a shame this article takes such a black and white approach. Brune, the relatively new head of the Sierra Club, admits that an allegation is true. The Sierra Club then makes a course correction. Policies are reworked to make sure this kind of hidden-donor process does not happen again. I compliment the SC for not going into denial, for agreeing that they made a mistake and for working to learn from the mistake. Thanks to the Sierra Club.
Becoming a quitter in this case is not the most effective thing to do, considering these honest admissions and changes in practices. Staying as a member is the more constructive thing to do. Help the group remember their mistakes; help history lessons stick.
Good to know this about the Sierra Club. I will no longer donate.It would also be good to get a database that tracks donations to environmental groups to see who's paying for what. Thank-you.
I too am deeply concerned with fracking and other natural gas impacts, and have written extensively on these subjects. See my blog posts: (1) http://ecosquared.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/the-rights-of-private-property-an-essay/ (2) http://ecosquared.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/the-san-bruno-gas-explosion-national-transportation-safety-board-lambasts-pge/
I was therefore disappointed learning that Sierra Club took funds from the natural gas industry. However, every organization and every person sometimes errs, even when the overall motives are honorable. In this case, Sierra Club, was focused on it what it saw as a bigger problem, the multiple and horrendous impacts of coal. I think if Michael Brune and others were able to go back in time, they may have taken a different path.
Let me say for the record, I am not a member of the Sierra Club. But I still believe that this organization has been one the greatest forces for sustainability and environmental protection in our nation. As a scientist and writer, I have worked extensively with many of their leaders and will continue to do so.
I would also add that this is no time for division among the allies. We are presently being beaten -- and badly so -- by Big Energy. Moreover, the real choice is not between natural gas and coal but between fossil fuels and renewable energy plus energy efficiency. Fossil fuel whatever the flavor is environmentally and politically corrupting. The benefits are distributed unevenly to say the least, while the costs are borne by the public. .
Sandra Steingraber has like the Sierra Club, made many outstanding contributions to the cause of environmental health. Her statements on the risks and costs of fracking are accurate and worrisome to the extreme. She is right to offer criticism of Sierra Club. However, I would ask her not to go through with the divorce. Give the Club another chance. I refer back to John Muir's quotation which she starts with. "No right way is easy. . . .We must risk our lives to save them." I agree, no "right way" is easy and sometimes we take wrong turns.
Both apology and forgiveness are often difficult. However, in my experience, their rewards are far bigger than the costs.
Henry S. Cole, Ph.D. Publisher Ekos-Squared. http://ecosquared.wordpress.com/
I really want to comment but, i don't have time. I'm going to my inbox to unsubscribe from my Sierra club updates and thier requests for money. Oh, by the way, the biggest fish in this fracking debaucKLe is T.BOONE PICKENS, WHO IS THE RAMROD for all the filthy dirty oil companys,He is the top of the pyramid, cabot oil and any other name, of any other company.HE IS THE HEAD HONCHO IN B. P. (BRITISH PETROLEUM) this man has his finger in every pie worldwide. His agressive greed for money is responsible for more bad water and toxic dumps world wide.I didn't know that the sierra club was anyhing but pristine. I'm so glad i read this.....Q
This is, unfortunately, a win-win for the fracking industry, as all these deals are between corporations and big environmental and other liberal organizations. The industries make an ally out of a potential/should be/would be enemy if the deal stays hidden, and if it's revealed, the environmental organization is discredited, dividing the ecologically aware and robbing those who care of years of organizing and of a place to get information, funnel work and money and gather. The power of money is ascendant right now, most of the money is in the hands of multinational corporations, and unless we change one of those facts, our lives will continue to deteriorate until we're overwhelmed by climate chaos, peak everything and the larger eco-psycho-social crisis.
So let's start talking about solutions in these comments rather than simply complain about the problems.
Education (about climate, economics, energy, food...)
Regaining control of our lives by buying less from corporations: bicycle, grow food, produce your own energy with solar (PV and other forms),and wind and efficiency, stop working for one if you do...
Regaining control of our government through the Occupy movement, repealing Citizens United and ending the idea of corporate personhood, recognizing the collaboration between the 2 major parties and the lie of the lesser of 2 weevils.
Regaining control of media so people are not exhausted, broken down and defeated by the overwhelming riverflow of lies.
...????
Brilliant moving piece - and action. Thank you, Ms. Steingraber
Brilliant moving piece - and action. Thank you, Ms. Steingraber
So in the absence of organizing by the Sierra Club, what's your solution, gordon?
The Chesapeake Energy donations started in 2007, years before Michael Brune was involved with the Sierra Club. He may not get points for a denial, but at least he did come clean and end the donations. This is his point of view: http://sierraclub.typepad.com/michaelbrune/2012/02/the-sierra-club-and-natural-gas.html
Yes, large national environmental organizations can make mistakes, but some can learn from their mistakes and correct them. The Sierra Club is still a democratic organization with elected officers at various levels, with grassroots activism, and significant discussion about policy alternatives. Natural gas was viewed as better than coal, because it is possible to have less carbon dioxide per amount of energy generated. Now we are learning about the environmental effects of fracking, and it does not look good. There is also one study (disputed by the fracking industry) that enough natural gas leaks out to make fracking have a global warming impact equal to that of coal.
There is a role for large national organizations, which can have the power to at least somewhat counteract the huge multinational energy corporations, and there is a role for small local organizations which can be quick and nimble.
The Sierra Club deserves significant credit for blocking, or helping to block, numerous coal-fired power plants, thus reducing future global warming.