EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Democracy Imperiled in the Maldives
Well before the launch of the Arab Spring, the people of the Maldives, a Muslim nation located on a tropical archipelago in the Indian Ocean, were engaged in widespread nonviolent resistance against the 30-year reign of the corrupt and autocratic president Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. The growing civil insurrection forced the dictator to finally allow for free elections in October 2008, which he lost.
Ousted president Mohamed Nasheed.
This triumph for democracy is now threatened as a result of a coup last month led by allies of the former dictator and hardline Islamists.
When the democratic opposition leader and former political prisoner Mohamed Nasheed assumed the presidency slightly over three years ago, he was faced with the difficult task of repairing the country's damaged social fabric from decades of misrule. While luxury resorts had mushroomed on many of the Maldives' remote islands, most of the population suffered in poverty. Indeed, Gayoom's legacy is one of shattered communities, destitution, crime and widespread drug abuse.
Despite their best efforts, Nasheed and his democratic allies were hampered by a court system still dominated by corrupt judges handpicked by the former dictator as well as violent protests by Islamists angered at the democratic government's moderate social policies. Meanwhile, despite struggles at home, Nasheed took global leadership inpushing for concrete international action on climate change, through which rising sea levels threaten his nation's very existence.
Nasheed's increasingly bold and popular efforts against the vestiges of the Gayoom dictatorship, however, threatened powerful interests. On February 7, police and other security forces with links to the old regime, in alliance with Vice-President Mohammed Waheed,forced President Nasheed to sign a letter of resignation. Subsequent evidence leaves little doubt that Nasheed was accurate in describing it as a coup d'etat.
Much to the dismay of the pro-democracy forces, the U.S. State Department initially recognized the sworn-in vice president as representing the legitimate government, though the Obama administration soon backed away from its recognition in the wake of a public outcry, particularly as evidence of the actual circumstances of Nasheed's departure became apparent.
Since the coup,pro-democracy demonstrators have once again taken to the streets as they had under Gayoom's rule. Once again, they are being met with brutal repression. In the face of growing protests, the junta has invited Nasheed and his party to join the new government as a junior partner in a coalition dominated by Waheed and supporters of the former dictatorship.
The United States has been pressuring the ousted president to accept the junta's offer. However, Nasheed -- confident that the majority of Maldivians support democracy and will return him to office -- has instead called for early elections as the only means of stabilizing the country.
The United States and much of the international community has understandably been focused on the repression and increasingly violent conflict in Syria. However, attention also needs to be given to the Muslim people of this Asian nation, whose nonviolent struggle for freedom foreshadowed the Arab Spring and whose democratic emergence is now in serious jeopardy.
Popular unarmed civil insurrections have toppled scores of dictatorships over the past three decades, from the Philippines to Poland, from Chile to Serbia, from Mali to the Maldives, and more recently in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen. These successes have demonstrated that democracy has the best chance of success if the leadership and initiative comes from within, not through “regime change” from the outside. However, while the United States and other major powers which espouse democracy don't have the power to launch such pro-democracy revolutions, the least they can do is avoid undermining them.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


8 Comments so far
Show AllIt would be surprising if the USG weren't able to engineer a general acceptance of the coupist regime (or a 'compromise' which would amount to the same thing) as it did in Honduras (although that one was with the assistance of Hugo Chavez...is anyone going to step in and do the heavy lifting for the US on this one?).
The Maldives and this country exemplify our future everywhere. Now that the ruling elites have crashed most societies, the only solution they have left is to call out the military.
Just watch how basic rights are disappearing every day. The police and the army now have rights to subdue the population - even when just exercising the right to free speech and assembly.
On Friday, I will be going to see a documentary called "Island President" which tells about President Nasheed and his efforts at democracy. It was made before the coup and should be very informative. Maybe your local film festival could arrange to get it.
"The United States and much of the international community has understandably been focused on the repression and increasingly violent conflict in Syria. However, attention also needs to be given to the Muslim people of this Asian nation..."
_____________________
Hmm, maybe "attention must be paid", but on the other hand, be careful what you wish for.
This seemingly innocuous, well-meaning quote conjures up the appalling and reprehensible specter of the kind of "attention" given to "Muslim people" typically given by the Amerikan Imperium and hegemonic allies and clients in the "international community".
You know-- "attention" in the form of high-minded, altruistic lip service and rhetorical support for "democracy" and sympathy for the oppressed masses, all as a preamble to a so-called "humanitarian intervention" that always seems to ultimately result in international corporations and financiers looting the "Muslim people"'s natural resources and becoming their economic masters.
It's like the "attention" Lenny gives to the rabbits in "Of Mice and Men".
"Tell me about the rabbits."
"However,while the United States and other major powers which espouse democracy don't have the power to launch such pro-democracy revolutions,the least they can do is avoid undermining them." That's asking WAY too much of this administration.
"The United States and much of the international community has understandably been focused on the repression and increasingly violent conflict in Syria."
Just another elite apologist for American imperialism. This kind of throw away line is the real "tell" in this high stakes game of propaganda. The world would be a better place if the US just went home and looked after its own affairs and its own people instead of its elites telling the world how to run their sovereign affairs.
American Exceptionalism is the 21st century equivalent of the 19th century British White Man's Burden. Self interest and greed dressed up as altruism.
The Anglo-Saxon connection.
Our language English is embedded with prejudice and lies. The word 'understandably', above, is an example of the slippery fellow travellers that thrive in the English environment.
As an entrepreneur, my bet is that the US encouraged this coup. It is staringly obvious.
We communicate in English. We have to destroy what it has become.
On these pages I have often attacked the use of the word American. It is the root of US exceptionalism.
Now for the word democracy. It is a lie. It applies to a situation in history that does not exist any more. A vote by show of hands is the only real democracy. The ANC in SA did not demand democracy. It demanded power for the people. Those black people in SA were and are much wiser than the Western anglo-saxons who trot out the d word endlessly. Democracy is only of value in so far as it gives power to the people. The US God Democracy is a fraud very similar to piracy in that it flies the flag of the people while it steals from them.
English has become the major problem on this planet as demonstrated by the wars for 'justice and peace' that the Anglo-Saxon is fighting now. He is showing his true colours; the Skull and Crossbones and while in the galley he shouts loudly at the hard work but he keeps hauling on the oars.
Sink the bloody ship!
Our media has to be overhauled, even keel hauled.
What I write here is so startlingly obvious yet very, very few have the courage to write it.
And so we shuffle onwards into endless war for the media makes our leaders.
We must sink the Anglo-Saxon Ship, Jolly Superior. It is a ship of bloody minded fools with a democratically elected series of self serving captains going in at the revolving door and a crew of lunatics, each firmly believing he will be the captain soon; fellow travellers. Its individualism you know; our great strength; another funny English word in this case meaning masturbuation.
Mutiny is required.
No games now. Sink the ship! Go to other countries and do not behave as saviours. Nothing in this world is more embabarrassing than the tall white man who thinks he is Jesus; who says he is not a Christian; who is even interested in Buddhism. Shut up and listen. Serve! Marry a native. Rear a mixed race family. Get away from the smell of Purity.