EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- 'Masters of Austerity' Targeted as Blockupy Activists Shut Down European Central Bank
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
Popular content
Today's Top News
The U.S. Empire’s Achilles Heel: Its Barbaric Racism
The latest atrocities in Afghanistan are just par for the course.
The American atrocities in Afghanistan roll on like a drumbeat from hell. With every affront to the human and national dignity of the Afghan people, the corporate media feign shock and quickly conclude that a few bad apples are responsible for U.S. crimes, that it’s all a mistake and misunderstanding, rather than the logical result of a larger crime: America’s attempt to dominate the world by force. But even so, with the highest paid and best trained military in the world – a force equipped with the weapons and communications gear to exercise the highest standards of control known to any military in history – one would think that commanders could keep their troops from making videos of urinating on dead men, or burning holy books, or letting loose homicidal maniacs on helpless villagers.
These three latest atrocities have brought the U.S. occupation the point of crisis – hopefully, a terminal one. But the whole war has been one atrocity after another, from the very beginning, when the high-tech superpower demonstrated the uncanny ability to track down and incinerate whole Afghan wedding parties – not just once, but repeatedly. Quite clearly, to the Americans, these people have never been more than ants on the ground, to be exterminated at will.
The Afghans, including those on the U.S. payroll, repeatedly use the word “disrespect” to describe American behavior. But honest people back here in the belly of the beast know that the more accurate term is racism. The United States cannot help but be a serial abuser of the rights of the people it occupies, especially those who are thought of as non-white, because it is a thoroughly racist nation. A superpower military allows them to act out this characteristic with impunity.
American racism allows its citizens to imagine that they are doing the people of Pakistan a favor, by sending drones to deal death without warning from the skies. The U.S. calls Pakistan an ally, when polls consistently show that its people harbor more hatred and fear of the U.S. than any other people in the world. The Pakistanis know the U.S. long propped up their military dictators, and then threatened to blow the country to Kingdom Come after 9/ll, if the U.S. military wasn’t given free rein. They know they are viewed collectively as less than human by the powers in Washington – and, if they don’t call it racism, we should, because we know our fellow Americans very well.
The U.S. lost any hope of leaving a residual military force in Iraq when it showed the utterly racist disrespect of Iraqis at Abu Ghraib prison, the savage leveling of Fallujah, the massacres in Haditha and so many other places well known to Iraqis, if not the American public, and the slaughter of 17 civilians stuck at a traffic circle in Nisour Square, Baghdad. What people would agree to allow such armed savages to remain in their country if given a choice?
The United States was conceived as an empire built on the labor of Blacks and the land of dead natives, an ever-expanding sphere of exploitation and plunder – energized by an abiding and general racism that is, itself, the main obstacle to establishing a lasting American anti-war movement. But, despite the peace movement’s weaknesses, the people of a world under siege by the Americans will in due time kick them out – because to live under barbarian racists is not a human option.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


129 Comments so far
Show AllI agree with the author. rwaller please indicate which words indict the author as a racist. Surely not his stating that the USA is racist? I myself struggle with not being racist. The USA military services, especially marines, ingrain racism in their bootcamps against the current target of imperialism. One interesting fact is Hitler considered Afghans to be the purest Ayrians, and in fact they are for the most part light skinned and green eyed. But of course racism is a matter of preconceived perceptions
Glenn, thoughtful article. The Aryans migrated from central Asia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan to the south and the Afghan's, the occupants of the Indus Valley in northern India are just a few area's the Aryans settled. As for Hitler and the NAZI'S, they, off all people would know what is a Aryan, being the foremost authority on Aryan-ism to this day. The vast majority of USAn self professed Aryans don't have a clue about Aryan history..
Th Aryans spent centuries fucking and fighting their way across Europe and part of the Near East. As a result, their "racial purity" ( a concept no doubt beyond the ken of your everyday Aryan), became completely diluted, so that by the time Hitler came along, he was barking up a dead tree. He was a funny kind of Aryan himself: short, with black hair and a goofy mustache.
"The author appears to be a prejudiced racist."
As opposed to a blatant racist and warmonger like Barack Obama?
As always, nicely stated. Between CD increased censorship along with the Dem apologists and neo conservitive trolls now dominating the comment section, I rarely post here anymore. I can deal with the apologetic wing of the Dem Party disguised as leftists and the neo conservative AH, but I lost respect for the editors. Appears they sold out to the apologetic pundit wing whose articles they propogate... makes one wonder if there is not a quid pro quo, financial arrangement with Dem apologists to disseminate their tripe, here?
Well said, ekobe!
I agree although there is one other site worse than this one that is occasionally taken over either by the Far Left, but more often the Far Right. I have a lot of trouble logging on as sometimes I am denied outright, other times I have to come back, and the rest of the time I am already logged in for posting. It's irritating. That being said, I agree withe writer and the article. The US has a long sordid history of native genocide and racist White-is-Right beliefs. I keep waiting for that one incident, that one moment, that one photograph, that one video that will incense Americans and demand an end to this mess. These selected targets of opportunity on those who can't fight back the US firepower. Most believe it was the Pentagon Papers for Vietnam. Others the Gulf of Tonkin truth. Still others the photograph of the young girl burned by napalm running naked down the road crying and screaming. A few believe it was My Lai. For me, It was the Kent State murders and I believe for the majority of the activists this was it as well. All the other war crimes merely fed the fuel of anti-war sentiment and outright revolt. I keep waiting for that to occur here and it hasn't and let me assure you there have been plenty of horrible moments, atrocious war crimes, vivid audio and video...And yet, we are not leaving. There is no movement to put a stop to our rogue government and off the reservation military. There is going to be no definitive moment captured for that has been done already, and yet they are not coming home. We are not leaving. We are not repentant. This is the way all empires die. With a whimper and tails tucked between their legs.
I think that you must look to the changes in the propagation and dissemination of information for the reasons behind the lack of a strong antiwar movement now. I was a teenager during the Vietnam era, and I remember well that the mass media were full of people who were against the war. Remember Walter Cronkite's personal fact-finding mission to Vietnam and his subsequent historical editorial denouncing the war on the evening news? Such a thing would be inconceivable now for a big-time talking head of Cronkite's stature. The consolidation of the ownership of the media, the resulting lack of competition, the blurring and overlap of governement and business--especially in this case the media and the armaments industries--and the seepage of all these interests into the manner in which events are perceived and then packaged for the public, make it well-nigh impossible for any sort of critical analysis to penetrate the airwaves, and thus the general public at large absorbs only false or purposefully limited information on the events that affect their lives. And let us not forget that the premise used speciously to justify these wars of conquest for resources--the 9/11 attacks--is itself false, thanks again and above all to the complicity of the media. As long as the majority of the public believes the official fairy-tale account of those events, they will, as intended, continue to accept, even against their better judgment, that the destruction of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, and now Syria and possibly Iran, is somehow necessary to the continued existence of their wasteful "way of life."
"The author appears to be a prejudiced racist."
As opposed to a blatant racist and warmonger like Barack Obama?
Merely the Clausewitz principle, make the oppressed pay the costs of their oppression.
While I don't disagree with the underlying assumptions of this piece of writing, I don't find the tone to be at all helpful to the writer's (presumed) cause. It's polemical and, as such will alienate those whose views might otherwise be swayed and simply confirm the beliefs and/or attitudes of others. So, I don't find the article useful on any level.
One example of its poor writing is the following:
"The United States was conceived as an empire built on the labor of Blacks and the land of dead natives, an ever-expanding sphere of exploitation and plunder – energized by an abiding and general racism ..." Sure, nobody would argue that our current wealth was built on the backs of unpaid and unwilling Africans (and that their descendants have never been compensated for this) or that colonizers killed untold Native Americans and stole their land ..... but I would ask "conceived" by whom? The early British colonizers? The framers of the US constitution? By the millions of immigrants who have settled in what is now the U.S.? By Native Americans? This implies that there was some grand master plan of empire.... if that's the author's intention, he needs to explain this better.
To me, your quibbles with this article are minor. What the author says about racism in the US is true. Yes he mskes this point aggressively, but we are talioking about a illion dead muslims as a result of US racist military imperialism.
Your quibble about the author's poor explanation of the "master plan," is also problematic in that you infer the master plan concept; this aws not the author's concept. But if you read the other comments here you would find ample explanation of the colonial leaders inperial aspirations.
Agreed. Playing the tired old race card only weakens his argument. If anything the racism tag applies to the author.
The tired old race card??!
What drugs are you on? Racism is at the very foundation of western intervention in Afghanistan..
It's old, and it's tired, but racist imperialism created the poverty in that nation. It continues to multiply the sufferring to this very day.
Please list one statement by the author that is racist.
Or are you another punk?
Is it illegal to video soldiers yet?
"To all things, a season, and a time for every purpose under heaven."
With that being said, the arc of history often takes decades to bend towards justice, but EVENTUALLY all karmic activities require retribution. That is the law of balance, and it's writ into the Cosmos like gravity. Consent is not required.
When humanity crossed into the new millennium, the new century represented a chance to begin to wipe the slate clean... to begin a process of sharing, rather than the continuance of resource acquisition at gun-point, the general theme of American foreign policy for more than century.
To instead witness yet new "generations" of weapons tested, and put to use in an effort to subdue Indigenous populations, as their natural resources are co-opted, is deadening to heart and soul. American imperialism has done far more damage than good, and one great scar to its current record is Haiti, an island left to rot after an earthquake. Then there's the toll of a likely one million lives lost in Iraq, and the parades of belligerent machismo sponsored by the MIC on display (literally like pissing contests) in Afghanistan.
To the soldier, life is made cheap; and it's not just racism. Glenn Ford failed to mention the role sexism plays in the cheapening of life. The asymmetric relationship between men and women set up the basis for inequality, and from there on, every form of slavery, class rank, or caste position ensued.
The cycles embedded into time suggest the U.S. has its reckoning coming, and we are about 6 months into one of the most challenging phases this nation will ever have confronted.
I just watched "JFK" again and Oliver Stone did an amazing job keeping what's known of this event On Record. While watching it, I realized that the same influences that set this coup into motion are those that set up 911. They want endless war and they've managed to set this most lawless of paradigms into motion. Even when the nation's people are hungry, homeless, and unemployed, still the marching boots of the American fascist party prey onward.
It IS diabolical, and Universal Law is being called upon to remedy the situation.
Watch for falling debris...
S.r., their is a 2 hour documentary about JFK which makes it onto TV once or twice a year and not on any media channel. During an exchange between JFK and then Chief of the Air Force General Curtis [Dr. Strangelove]LeMay delivers a not so veiled threat to JFK, "that if JFK didn't go to war in Vietnam it would be the end of his, JFK's Presidency". JFK was taken back, needless to say. The MIC wanted war in Vietnam badly and was not confident that JFK give them their war. JFK did not refer to south Vietnam, but instead just Vietnam. He realized their was no south Vietnam there.LeMay's threat and a remark made by Jackie Kennedy, "they've killed him". when she was retrieving a piece of JFK's skull on the trunk. Taken together and the fact that JFK had a long list of enemies in the USG; FBI, CIA,DIA just to name a few. Also, the Federal Reserve/International bankers, JFK was going back to a silver certificate and trash the Federal Reserve note. Also, the Zionists wanted JFK dead, he had called the Israeli PM and told him to stop Israel's nuclear weapons development, enter MOSSAD. The Texas oil men, Nixon and LBJ had met in Texas the day before the assassination. J. Edgar Hoover immediately called George H.W.. Bush, who was not in the government, to notify Bush about the murder.
Curtis Lemay was one of the greatest butchers in history as was the Air force he helped found. His legacy of butchery lives on in that air force today.
a couple of interesting tidbits about LeMay;
The April 25, 1988 issue of The New Yorker carried an interview with retired Air Force Reserve Major General and former U.S. Senator from Arizona, Barry Goldwater, who said he repeatedly asked his friend General LeMay if he (Goldwater) might have access to the secret "Blue Room" at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, alleged by numerous Goldwater constituents to contain UFO evidence. According to Goldwater, an angry LeMay gave him "holy hell" and said, "Not only can't you get into it but don't you ever mention it to me again."[37] wikipedia entry on LeMay
Also the well known right leaning critic of the Federal Reserve, G Edward Griffin, wrote speeches for LeMay when Lemay ran as segregationist Wallace's running mate in 1968.
A motorcycle dealer friend of mine once breathlessly offered me an antique Norton which had belonged to Lemay. I turned it down.I suppose I could have bought it and burned it, like the guy who bought Hitler's yacht and sunk it.
Hi, Bogi... I know much of what you stated in this post as it's pretty much explained in the book, "JFK & The Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters." There's NO question in my mind that JFK would have roped in the MIC (especially the State Department/CIA) if he'd lived. Having not viewed Stone's film in many years, I was astonished by the courage, guts, and integrity of the prosecutor, Garrison, who went after Henry Shaw... smelling a rat and KNOWING that Oswald was the patsy to a far wider conspiracy.
What was very amusing for me was hearing one of Garrison's men state the same line I've heard used on THIS SITE regarding the idea that something so big could not be kept secret. The cover-up around Kennedy's assassination is much like the cover-up as to what took place on 911. And the same people, or their new replacements, were involved in both. WHEN this truth will be known to all is tough to say. Just as millions refuse to believe in evolution, women's rights, or global warming... the exposure of truth is no guarantee that fiercely deadlocked minds can recognize it. Scary indeed, but expected in a society where the elites took Bernays' advice (and protocols) VERY seriously. ALEC, being one major example. PR, after all, sells a lot more than toothpaste.
If you should ever get an change to see the 2 hour documentary I mentioned, it's a must see. The exchange between JFK and LeMay is only 5 or 10 second long and I watched the documentary several times before picking up on it. It's the only intact 2 hour JFK documentary not broken up into segments and will not be shown on the Military Channel or any major media.
Thanks to both of you about JFK movies. They are both on this month.
bogi, do you know the name of the movie you are talking about?
It's only described as a documentary about JFK, and to the best of my knowledge it is the only two hour documentary billed as being 2 hours. I recently saw it on the documentary channel which I get on my DISH satellite 197. Another documentary"The man who predicted 9/11" is the only worthwhile documentary about 9/11 and is only shown once or twice a year as the USG and MSM don't want the information of these two films to be known.I will attempt to get some information about the JFK documentary and let you know what I find.
Good point.
Humans are compassionate and we should expect a revision to the mean - eventually.
I immigrated from Germany after WW2 and see Amerika as a straightforward continuation of the attempt of the white "superior" race of men to dominate everyone. (Women need to be dominated also, of course)
Guess it will have to run it's course to total collapse before a more humane effort at constructing a society can be made.
You traffic in statements of gross misjudgement. I wonder if you just operate as a troll or are otherwise paid to invert the dialog?
Sorry mate, you are not politically correct and therefore are deemed unsuitable for the Nation of Common Dreams. You will not be allowed to join the tribe and, banished, must walk the wilderness of your opinion on your own, an outlaw from the Exceptionalists who here post the one true Truth.
Whether or not I agree with you, you have the right to have your say without being abused.
Rwaller, Both a racist and a sexist. You must have a lot of friends.
Women can't even get health insurance to cover birth control in Amerika. The King of the Pedophiles said no, so Barack the Baby Killer agreed that it would violate the religious freedoms of the pedophile worshipers for them to have to pay for something they disagree with.
I disagree with war and the mass murder of innocent Muslim children, but Barack the Baby Killer wants me to pay for that. Why should you and your pedophile religious nuts get a pass?
Don't worry about him. He'd like to carpet-bomb this thread, but the best he can do is chuck M-80's out of the window of his Piper Cub.
I see you're stupid as well as racist and sexist.
LOL, you're a racist and a sexist.
I immigrated from America to N.Z. in 2004, when it became clear that we were following the path of Nazi Germany. I didn't want my children to mature in a society that celebrates the assassination of the boogie man (OBL), like its spring break in D.C. For years, I second guessed myself as being paranoid....but not anymore.
Yeah, you say you want the amerikan facists out of Afganistan. We'd all love to see the plan. However.... "The United States was conceived as an empire built on the labor of Blacks and the land of dead natives"... The people who kicked out the oppressive English were not thinking of "empire"! They just wanted a country free of taxing totalitarian masters. Yes, the US does this now, but, John Adams and many other founders of the US were not slave owners and wanted it stopped. That they couldn't, well Mr. Ford, how about you, personally, get the US out of Afganistan!...Mr. Ford is rewriting history. If he wants to bring up 200+ year old situations, why doesn't he talk about the blacks in Africa who captured & sold other blacks to Arab & European buyers. That sounds like it was an atrocity - and racist. Racism permeates most countries one way or another. Perhaps Mr. Ford also has a plan to stop all racism in Africa.... and stop the killing of animals for their ivory, etc., too! Likely just republicans wearing shoe polish....
As far as eliminating all the native americans merely to build an empire, some 90% died of disease at a time when not one human understood the pathogen process of disease. As most humans today are still immature, clearly, most of them from hundreds or thousands of years ago didn't have a clue as to real ethics and morals, and change, unfortunately, is slow.
Troop transports back to USA would be a ducky plan. The Colonials especially Washington were thinking empire, for one British law they wished to discard was that against stealing Native trans-Appalacian lends, rebels were paid, at wars end, by Washington in trans-Appalacian lands. The first governor of Conneticut purposely gave Natives smallpox blankets as presents ( Europeans definitely knew which diseases were communicable and which werre not).The history of USA slavery is still rebounding on prison walls and in inner cities thats why its pertinent. Almost the whole world dealt in slavery at one time, Europeans enslaved Europeans. Finally humankind has always known love and justice, as they have always known ignorance and viciousness.
What Americans don't seem to realize is that at this time(colonial times) they were already slaves themselves and a tool to spread the concept. It was in every facet of life and for the most part still is. The confrontation with a free people that would not accept these standards and in many cases would prefer to die trying has slowed the process. I see it everyday here. I think Americans will have to experience something outside of themselves to finally see it and the sooner the better, they are not well liked in the world.
Zanrak,
Like most people, you live an ideology and confuse it with facts. You believe the USA ideology of a revolution with saintly founding fathers who wanted equality for all, when in fact most of our "leaders" during and after the revolution came from the 1%, supported only the 1%, and deliberately wrote the constitution to keep the 99% out of government and to keep blacks in slavery. These people met in a secret convention and presented a fait accompli to the hoi polloi. Many protested, but to no avail. Virtually the entire upper class in America supported slavery.
Racism continues unabated in the USA. Only deluded white Americans believe it has ended. The USA has the largest prison population in the world in sheer numbers and as a percentage of their population. Read Michelle Alexander's "The New Jim Crow" if you want to understand.
But you won't, because white Amerikans do not live in a fact based universe. Amerikans lynched blacks until 1968 and continue to treat them like half humans.
You made this comment, which has no basis in historical fact:
"The people who kicked out the oppressive English were not thinking of "empire"! They just wanted a country free of taxing totalitarian masters. Yes, the US does this now, but, John Adams and many other founders of the US were not slave owners and wanted it stopped."
John Adams, like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, James K. Polk, Zachary Taylor, and Franklin Pierce all supported slavery.
In 1819, Robert Walsh wrote "An Appeal from the Judgments of Great Britain Respecting the United States of America," in which he wrote the longest and most extensive defense of slavery in Amerika. James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and other pro-slavery racist Amerikans praised it. John Adams wrote, "it is the most able, the most faithful, and the most ample apology for the United States," and that "indeed it is a book after my own heart."
Madison called the book "a triumphant vindication of our Country against the libels which have been lavished on it."
Jefferson wrote, "Your work will furnish the first volume of every future American history."
Adams said the "book is worthy of being translated into the Modern Languages and dispersed in all the Courts and Nations in Europe, at our National Expense."
Walsh corresponded with Adams, Madison, and Jefferson while writing the book, and with Madison and Jefferson in particular on the subject of slavery.
All from "Proslavery: A History of the Defense of Slavery in America, 1701-1840," by Larry E. Tise.
As to your comment that the founders didn't think about Empire, read the anti-federalist papers on this subject. They warned against a standing army and centralization of government because it would lead to Empire:
http://mises.org/journals/jls/4_3/4_3_1.pdf
Rubbish> Many of the Native Americans were used as slaves by your beloved Colonists and worked to death. Indeed the State of Georgia used to raid down into Florida (which was then part of Spain) to seize The Seminoles and other Natives to be used as slaves after they had slaughtered the ones in Georgia.
Thomas Jefferson wrote quite clearly as per letters in your own Library of Congress of his desire to clean the eatsern USA of Natives and of his desire to extend the US Empire to the Western Coast.
Indeed in the war of 1812 he wrote that all the USA had to do was march on Canada and the Canadians would join the USA.
AS to your "revolt against taxes". This another myth. Here is a fact. Taxes in the newly born United States of America were 5 and 10 times HIGHER then they had been under the British. Indeed the taxes paid In Canada to the British Crown were a fraction of what US Citizens were paying their newly formed Government.
One of the resons Jefferson thought it was merely a matter of marching so as to annex Canada was that Canada was filled with ex residents of the United States of America. He failed to understand that many of those residents migrated to Canada to escape high taxes.
While these ex Americans did not rise up to fight the Americans, neither did they join them. Indeed it was only after the soldiers for the United States of American began plundering their farms, burning down their towns and claiming any Canadian caught fighting alongside an Indian (more of that RACISM) would be hung that these ex americans started taking up arms.
The number of Natives claimed to have been killed by diseases is vastly overstated. Indeed the United States Governemtn deliberately advanced this notion so as to justify the stealing of the lands. In Eastern States people who claimed Native Ancestry were marked down in the records as of MIXED race so that the Governmnet could claim their land rights extinguished.
During the Potato Famine in Ireland many Irish died of typhus. Thousands of them in Ireland and many more thrown overboard on the trip to the new world or in quarantine area on islands built to accept them.
They tended to succumb to typhus because they were sufferring from malnutrition.
George W Washington made it a point of destroying the food crops of the Natives of the Villages he attacked as did your hallowed founders. Those Bison on the prairie were slaughtered by the US GOvernment so as to remove the Natives food supply.
That persons weaked by malnutrition due to having their food supplies and sources of food destroyed might have succumbed to a disease in their weakened state hardly means that those destroying their supplies of food "were just nice people trying to evade taxes".
See:
"Written Out of History: The Untold Legacy of Native American Slavery"*
______________________
* http://intercontinentalcry.org/written-out-of-history-the-untold-story-of-native-american-slavery/
Well, GW,
You have this nasty habit of placing facts into our discussion. Everything was going along just fine until you showed up...again! lol
Thank you, GW, excellent comment as usual. (Inconvenient to those who prefer the mythological version of this nations history). I am just waiting for that guy to show up to remind us that things are much worse in the Sudan.
Take care,
Thomas Gilbert-
Good to read that some folks are getting it. Thanks for the excellent response.
"The people who kicked out the oppressive English were not thinking of "empire"! "
-- Um, yes, they were thinking of empire. Some of the founders even used direct words like empire to describe what they wanted this country to be. You can delude yourself all you want, but the words and actions that came directly out of their mouths make it clear that they were thinking of building an empire. Many great political and historical scholars have written extensively on this fact.
Professor Chomsky had this to say about American imperialism, “[Talking about American imperialism] is a rather challenging task. In fact, talking about American imperialism is a little bit like talking about triangular triangles. The United States is the one country that exists, as far as I know, and ever has, that was founded as an empire explicitly. According to the Founding Fathers, when the country was founded, it was a “nascent empire.” That is George Washington’s [words].”
George Washington wasn’t the only Founding Father using the word empire to describe the newly created nation. In the Federalist Papers #1, Alexander Hamilton wrote about the need for creating of a new Constitution to protect “the fate of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world.”
The westward expansion started from the very first moments of the creation of the United States. Sheldon Wolin, professor emeritus of politics at Princeton University writes, “Virtually from the beginning of the nation the making of the American citizen was influenced, even shaped by, the making of an American imperium. The nineteenth-century expansion of the country to the west and southwest was achieved by military victories over various Indian nations and Mexico. It brought new opportunities for enterprise, exploitation, and ownership. It made conquest and violence familiar, part of everyday experience.”
“The American empire is repressed in the national ideology.”
"The people who kicked out the oppressive English were not thinking of "empire"!"
You're trying to ignore that one reason the founding fathers broke away from Britain was because they were afraid various British court judgment that found slavery illegal in Britain:
Shanley v Harvey (1763):
"soon as a man sets foot on English ground he is free."
and R v Knowles (1772):
"es, the US does this now, but, John Adams and many other founders of the US were not slave owners and wanted it stopped. "
Irrelevant. They might have wanted it stopped, they did not stop it. Intentions are worthless, actions are what matter. Instead America built its economy on the cheap labour of black slaves.
"That they couldn't, well Mr. Ford, how about you, personally, get the US out of Afganistan!."
You are being disingenuous. Your precious founding fathers had the political power to stop slavery. The writer does not.
"Mr. Ford is rewriting history. "
No, you're trying to rewrite history, because you're offended by criticism of your beloved sacred founding fathers.
"why doesn't he talk about the blacks in Africa who captured & sold other blacks to Arab & European buyers. That sounds like it was an atrocity - and racist. Racism permeates most countries one way or another. Perhaps Mr. Ford also has a plan to stop all racism in Africa.... and stop the killing of animals for their ivory, etc., too! Likely just republicans wearing shoe polish."
Nope. Racism and the slave trade once existed. That does not refute the argument that America profitted from racism and the slave trade, and built its economy on the cheap labour of black slaves.
"s far as eliminating all the native americans merely to build an empire, some 90% died of disease at a time when not one human understood the pathogen process of diseas"
You're lying. Settlers and colonialists deliberately spread smallpox to Native Americans via contaminated blankets.
"As most humans today are still immature, clearly, most of them from hundreds or thousands of years ago didn't have a clue as to real ethics and morals, and change, unfortunately, is slow"
It is clear that you're a racist without a clue to real ethics and morality.
First of all native americans did understand pathology to the extent that they didn't live in disease infested communities as Europeans did. They had similar illness but it was easy to cure, with some exceptions. I don't know where you get your history but I think you would benefit from a wider viewpoint. Incidentally, the diseases of modern man are still killing indigenous people that never experience diseases like cancer.
Thank you for this excellent post.
You have, unconsciously, proven Mr. Ford's point about an abiding racism in the USA which weakens any "progressive" anti-war movement or any other social or environmental justice movement in the US for that matter. You forget, to name just a few, Manifest Destiny doctrine and the fact that Native Americans were also deliberately infected with disease with the infamous small pocks blankets. And you also forget that indigenous people did not invite the white invaders who carried their bible in one hand and the rifle in the other: An invading horde of hypocrites and genocidal maniacs. Manifest Destiny IS the doctrine of American Empire one it built on the enslavement of the African and the genocide of the Native peoples after the theft of their land. Time for white folks in the USA to come to term with these originating crimes which have made all the rest possible. Time to demand that the USA deal with them honestly and withdraw from its economic and militaristic global reach.
Here is a poignant quote from Edward Mitchell in Psychic Exploration: A Challenge for Science.
"Only when man sees his fundamental unity with the processes of nature and the functioning of the universe – as I so vividly saw it from the Apollo spacecraft – will the old ways of thinking and behaving disappear. Only when man moves from his ego-centered self-image to a new image of universal human will the perennial problems that plague us be susceptible of resolution. Humanity must rise from man to mankind, from the personal to the transpersonal, from self-consciousness to cosmic consciousness. Humanity’s multiple problems resolve themselves into one fundamental problem: how to change consciousness. How can we raise our awareness to a higher level – a level that will restore the unity of human, the planet, and the universe?"
I suggest a few days camping in the wilderness, without the rifle or booze.
Thank you for the enlightened post, Pueo. I agree with its thesis; however many in this forum regard any spiritual matters as superfluous to the battle between labor and "owners." They prefer that conjecture adapt to that theme.
Thank you so much, Glen Ford, for exposing the Evil Empire!
Incidentally, I don't recall seeing rwaller around here before. He or she is just one among many provocateurs who appear here and whose sole purpose is to make other commentators waste their time. It seems to me that he or she ought to be ignored.
rwaller has been around for awhile, usually posts on abortion issues.