Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- No More Steubenvilles: How To Raise Boys to be Kind Men
- 37 Percent of People Completely Lost
- An Open Challenge to Michelle Rhee and the Corporate Education Zombies
- Ten Years After: How Not to Teach About the Iraq War
- Which Members of Congress Are Standing Up for Economic Decency – And Which “Progressives” Aren’t
Popular content
Today's Top News
People Who Fly Drones Shouldn’t Throw Stones
War is a delusional activity by its very nature. When two sides both claim their cause is right and just, you know one of them has to be wrong, and maybe both. Still, even in time of war some statements stand out for their degree of delusionality. Take, for instance, the recent remarks of Gen. John R. Allen, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan. Speaking of the shooting deaths of two American officers inside the Afghanistan Interior Ministry building, he called “The perpetrator of this attack ... a coward whose actions will not go unanswered.” Pentagon press secretary George Little later weighed in as well, warning that “Anyone who believes they can weaken our resolve through these cowardly attacks is severely mistaken.” The cowardice the officials denounced was presumably the fact that the Ministry employee suspected of the shootings had fled the scene. According to our American code of honor, they seem to be saying, killers don’t hide.
But what of killers who never show their faces at all? Is this the American way? You wouldn’t think so from the outraged official comments, but obviously it is. And these days we seem quite pleased that it is. Remember the drones – or the unmanned aerial vehicles, as generals and press secretaries prefer we call them? In military speak, they are the USA’s “unique assets.” But, just as they say that guns don’t kill people, people do, America’s unique assets don’t kill people, drone operators in Nevada do.
When the US military killed eight boys in Afghanistan in February, their killers didn’t have to run from the boys’ enraged families. They just went home after their shifts were over, unless maybe they went out to dinner or something. No one around them even knew they’d killed anybody – and it’s not clear how many would have cared if they did. Does the general mean to say that he considers people who kill in that fashion cowards for not being around to face the music? Or are American standards of cowardice only applied to non-Americans?
Actually it appears we needn’t worry so much about our drone operators taking this sort of consideration personally. A 2011 Air Force report found almost half of them experiencing high job-related stress levels, but it wasn’t particularly caused by watching the videos of people killed as a result of their actions – that didn’t actually bother them nearly so much as some feared it might. Turns out it’s mostly the long hours and irregular shifts that get them down.)
Obviously, asking whether American officials mean to apply these standards to Americans is only a rhetorical question, as they so clearly don’t. After all, it was only last year that the President shredded the War Powers Act by arguing that he could bomb anyone he wanted (in Libya in that instance), without Congressional approval, so long as he put no Americans at risk in the operation. So it appears that if we can just do something to improve those operator working hours, it’ll be clear sailing for drone warfare.
In fact, some might argue that government officials’ wartime remarks shouldn’t be expected to stand up to any rigorous examination of their consistency because that’s not really what they’re about – they’re only designed to pump up the “patriotism” of the home audience to keep them backing the war effort. Except for one thing – this Administration, just as the one before it, obviously doesn’t feel the need to even secure public backing for its wars. If it has the military and the foreign policy establishment, it seems to think that’s more than enough.
Given how expendable domestic foreign policy support has become in the day of the all volunteer army and the drone, it seems likely that in the long run outside forces will exert more influence in taming Washington’s free bombing ways than we will. So as U.S. policy makers denounce the cowardice of their enemies, they may want to consider just how many people in the rest of the world are going to conclude that suicide bombers who give up their own lives are far less cowardly than generals, drone operators and even presidents who pride themselves on waging war in ways that carry no risk to themselves or to their constituencies.
Before calling others cowards, we might do well to remember that emerging twenty-first century proverb: People who fly drones shouldn’t throw stones.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



14 Comments so far
Show Allgradually the american public will become more tolerant of masked killers murdering at will, just as many americans rationalize police brutality (including occasional murders by the police) against african americans in the ghettos of america. as long as the egregious activity is happening to someone else (that other is always defined by MSM), it will be tolerated. we slaughtered the native americans, we enslaved africans, we conquered all in our path as we defined our enemies as the other.
the drone is just the latest novel tool of empire. once the public believes the 'authorities' will properly use the tool in their (perception created by MSM) best interest (all ready suggested by a few polls showing american support of drones against american enemies)- it's anything goes, and so it will be when authorities in the US start targeting dissenters in america who dare question the official story.
...peace...
its so freaky to listen to the amerikan war mongers talk about revenge and settling accounts
if i believed in god i would look forward to knowing that one day amerika will face its due - but alas that will never happen
it will just continue into a fascist dystopian hellhole of toxic water cancer ridden vaccines and change you can believe in brother
then one day china will zap us with a pulse weapon of some kind and the rest will be left to the roaches
no cowards - no heroes
just an entirely regrettable exercise of wealthy rich white guys stealing everything they could as long as they could
entirely regrettable
The Samurai used to believe killing with a gun instead of a sword was unmanly. Research is being conducted on operating drones with brainwaves. New autonomous software systems are being developed to remove the kill decision all together. Then we can say it was a computer error just like our VISA bills.
The author notes that " When two sides both claim their cause is right and just, you know one of them has to be wrong, and maybe both."
David Swanson drives this point home even more emphatically in his book War Is a Lie.
The title of your post says it all, Tom! Well said. Thanks.
one of the key successes those pushing drones have had is establishing as 'controversial fact' that humans are guiding, and firing, these contraptions...
this is meant to preserve the notion that, whether one agrees, or not, humans are still commanding the drones...
the truth, of course, is that humans currently may, or may not, always be at the controls, but the future is computerization...
the day is coming, and soon, when there will be no question as to whether the pilot is a coward, or not, as there will be no pilot...
this article attempts to prevent that realization by promoting the 'controversy' of humans using drones to kill other humans remotely...
this is but a window of time in the implementation of a global, computerized drone network of supra-governmental surveillance and control...
this is where our eyes must go...
The level of depraved hypocrisy goes very deep for any imperial power that believes in its own delusions of moral righteousness. It goes even deeper for liberal interventionists.
In recent days, it is the putrid pack of lies from Obama's state department that are emitting the most foul order. Bloodthirsty Hillary Clinton and "disgusted" Susan Rice make a atrocious pairing of odious sanctimony at the UN.
Good article, except for one thing. The REAL killers are USA taxpayers and voters. Removing ourselves from the chain is a bit like what the guys who control the drones do. Let's not be like them. We need to admit our complicity. We need to push for reparations for the families of those we kill. The bill should be paid by us - USA taxpayers.
I agree, Rosemarie.
According to the news accounts I've read, the two US military officers shot and killed in a supposedly highly secure room in the Ministry of the Interior (ie., domestic spy service) of the Karzai government in Kabul were a major and a lieutenant colonel holding top security clearances. The alleged gunman who shot both these officers in the head escaped from the room, the building and perhaps the city. He is still at large. He, too, held the highest level security clearance in the Iraqi intelligence community.
How odd it is for General Allen and the Pentagon press office to immediately label the gunman a "coward...." who committed "cowardly acts." The genuine worry (which perhaps best explains the sudden withdrawal of all sorts of similarly situated NATO occupation force advisors from similar Afghan Ministry duty stations) is that the assailant was a double agent. The gunman was cleared to work with these two shooting victims. His pre-planned escape apparently came off without a hitch.
Stripped to its essentials, most objective observers would likely call this cold bloded double homicide a successful "targeted assassination", would they not? To echo Tom Gallagher's theme a bit differently, why are Uncle Sam's targeted assassinations undertaken by SEAL kill/capture teams or Predator drones considered justifiable, or even heroic acts of war, while the brazen assassination of two high ranking US military intelligence officers waging the war on terror at their supposedly secure duty stations is cowardice?
Bill from Saginaw
According to ABC News:
Describing the sequence of events that led to the interior ministry shootings, the source said the US advisers were "scolding the protesters and calling them bad names" as they watched videos of protests in Kabul.
"They called the Koran a bad book in the presence of (an Afghan colleague). After all this the guy had verbal arguments with the advisers and was threatened by them. He gets angry and shoots them. Eight rounds were fired at them," the source added, requesting anonymity.
"He then sneaks out and disappears. No-one knew about the incident for more than an hour because the room is soundproofed," he said, adding that CCTV cameras had been viewed in the investigation of the shooting.
Sorry, don't have the link, just a pdf copy.
"The source" for this description of the shooting is unnamed, and identified only as an Afghan "government official" by ABC. If it were a targeted assassination by a double agent, wouldn't the scenario offered up serve as a fairly believable damage control cover story benefiting both embarrassed American military intelligence officials and the Karzai government?
A Taliban spokesman supposedly later took credit for the killings. Judge the credibility of that claim for yourself. People in the streets were already angry at both the Americans and Hamid Karzai over the Koran burnings, as well as the continuing night raids and drone attacks.
Rather than acknowledge that a horrendous security breakdown took place inside the Ministry of Interior intelligence headquarters in Kabul, why not publicly blame it on insensitive provocations by the victims which set off a spontaneous outburst of anger by the shooter?
That's at least a marginally better story for public consumption than admitting the Taliban, or Al Qaeda, or maybe even the Pakistani ISI had successfully pulled off a spectacular black ops hit.
Bill from Saginaw
Putting a frozen chicken diner in the microwave is much easier and cleaner that killing, plucking, and gutting a chicken, someone else got their hands dirty, life is good. Same thing with war, as long as it's someone else doing the gutting it's alright with us. Push a button on the microwave, or push a button to fire a hellfire missile from a drone, same thing. It's quick, clean, and easy. No heroism or courage required. Life is good. By the way you have to go all the way back to WW2 to find a US general KIA, you know they are the bravest of the brave and like to lead from the front.
Like the Puppeteers in Larry Niven's Ringworld series. Cowards who stay in the back and let others do the killing for them.