Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Forgetting the Past, One Military Movie at a Time
When the entertainment industry gets in bed with the Pentagon, censorship is inevitable
When philosopher George Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” he meant it as an admonition–not as an endorsement of mass amnesia or historical revision. This should be obvious.
Yet those operating at the shadowy intersection of the Pentagon and Hollywood either don’t understand–or, more likely, refuse to understand–the thrust of the aphorism. Instead, with this week’s release of a much-awaited film, Santayana’s omen has been transformed into a public mission statement for a burgeoning Military-Entertainment Complex.
Since 1986’s Top Gun rekindled the Pentagon-Hollywood relationship from its post-Vietnam doldrums, the collusion between the military and the entertainment industry has become a blockbuster con, generating huge benefits for both participants–and swindling the American public in the process.
The scheme is simple: The Pentagon allows studios to use military hardware and bases at a discounted, taxpayer-subsidized rate. In exchange, filmmakers must submit their scripts to the Pentagon for line edits. Not surprisingly, those edits often redact criticism of military policy, revise depictions of historical failures, and generally omit anything else that might make audiences wonder if our current defense policy is repeating past mistakes.
If a studio doesn’t agree to the edits, then it loses access to the martial equipment, and typically, the film is terminated. If, by contrast, filmmakers agree to the edits, access is granted, and the film gets made at a cut-rate price to the studio. Except in the credits’ fine print, the audience is never told about the censorship.
The predictable result is a glut of movies that both celebrate U.S. military policy and whitewash the checkered history of military adventurism–and relatively few major movies questioning that policy and that adventurism.
No doubt as a system of stealth coercion, the arrangement has been wildly effective. But with America now questioning the efficacy of constant invasions and the morality of never-ending occupations, the Pentagon is getting worried and thus intensifying its agitprop to ever more manipulative extremes. Last year, for example, it cemented its first full sponsorship of a major film, X-Men: First Class, integrating the movie into recruitment ads. It’s now going even further, fully financing its own feature-length film, Act of Valor, appearing in theaters nationwide starting February 24.
Casting active-duty SEALs, the film is ostensibly about a mission to neutralize terrorists. But as one of the filmmakers let slip this week, its heroic portrayals and triumphs are really designed to once again make us forget the past.
“I’d like to see the legacy of Vietnam put to bed,” said Act of Valor filmmaker Mike “Mouse” McCoy in an interview with the Huffington Post. “It was a really bad time in American history, absolutely, but it’s time to sort of forget that and forget those sensibilities and don’t associate our troops and our men and women to that conflict anymore, and time to really open our eyes to say, ‘What’s going on in this world? What are our men and women in uniform really doing right now for us?’”
While it’s true that America’s recent wars are not exactly the same as the Vietnam War, a stunning new report in Armed Forces Journal proves there are troubling similarities we could learn from. With history’s lessons in mind, we might learn to refrain from involving ourselves in foreign quagmires because the human costs are too high. We might also learn that some conflicts have no military solution at all.
But such lessons run counter to a Pentagon focused on perpetually repeating a military-centric past, so those lessons are being deliberately obscured. That’s indeed a triumph of the Military-Entertainment Complex, but it’s a Pyrrhic victory for America – one that guarantees Santayana’s warning goes unheeded.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


72 Comments so far
Show AllDavid: I'm sorry to say but you are kneaded from the same pastry that is empire and for some reason you can't remove yourself from its language. "But it’s a Pyrrhic victory for America – one that guarantees Santayana’s warning goes unheeded."
That should have read: [but it’s a shame for America .....] There is no pyrrhic victory in death or as such that one has returned from the dead and uttered those words. That narrative has become an appropriate response when the "other" is doing the dying but the writer is doing the learning. You quote Santayana but Michel Foucoult: "there is no binary division to be made between what one says and what one doesn't say; we must try to determine the different ways of not saying things," is more in tune with our times. There is no evolving trajectory (rational reasoning) that propels our government to move in the direction they choose; it's one of design that yields the end product for them just like manufacturing stamps out products one needs for the marketplace. The film industry is no different. Thus, the lost aphorism is by choice and not lack wisdom in their part. And to appreciate MF one has to look at the interventions according to Historian William Blum in 69 countries where the US has participated in some form of military or covert action; this is surely not due to lack of memory. The sky is red the sky is blue if I'm running for president it's also true what else is new.
Thank you, lanista.
On Siouxrose's last point, that's where there's actually some light at the end of the tunnel in McCoy's issue framing, setting aside his desired amnesia about Vietnam: What are our men and women in uniform really doing right now for us?
The short answer to that question is that our men and women in infantry uniform at least are behaving less and less like traditional soldiers, and more and more like self-directed vigilante assassins.
Under traditional Mars-like macho military male ethic, the entire reason soldiers dress up in special, highly visible clothing which advertises their unique, lethal job function and why soldiers create an entire, highly elaborate heirarchical command structure is to prepare them to confront their designated enemy counterparts in mortal combat - to kill other soldiers who are similarly gussied up and organized to efficiently dispense death. No more.
Now the Special Ops warrior cult yearns to take off their uniforms, mingle in disguise with local civilians, or sneak up upon their quarry clandestinely and stealthily like masked thieves in the night. This is the historical antithesis of Achilles versus Hector, my nation's knight champion versus your nation's knight champion, the blue locked in mass mayhem against the grey at Gettysburgh, or even combat on the eastern and western European fronts during the 20th Century's great World Wars.
What is glorified today is premeditated murder, rebranded as targeted assassination - not shooting at a rival soldier or a hostile approaching batallion which threatens our country's soil, but killing some designated civilian "terrorist" somewhere, who can be lurking anywhere on the face of the globe. The whole point is to do this dirty work as secretly and "professionally" as possible, then to slip away silently, clothed in deniability whenever deadly mistakes inevitably get made.
Hoorah! More and more, that is precisely what the most glorified of our heroic men and women in uniform are doing for us right now. It is not soldiering or waging war or deterring war or actually keeping the peace at all, as those words were traditionally understood.
Uncle Sam is into riding on the dark side with the bad boys now, when not incinerating them with a robotic-controlled Predator missle from far beyond the horizon. We pretend this is the new face of war. It needs Hollywood's magic to help make this illusion seem real.
Bill from Saginaw
Thanks for the attribution, Bill, along with an excellent post.
That is an extremely powerful and insightful post. It has given me much pause for thought.
I think your analysis is correct. Disturbing, isn't it?
Yes, well said Bill from Saginaw, and thank you for saying it.
And underneath the cloaks of stealth and deniable plausibility, we have the pervasive and persuasive MYTH (viral infectious meme) of American exceptionalism, that we can do so -- because we are supposedly ipso facto -- always are on the side of right and justice.
AMERICAN DELUSIONARY EXCEPTIONALISM
We glorify death and destruction to support and incite the trappings of this delusion, as you clearly demonstrated, what other REASON could there be ?
"What is glorified today is premeditated murder"
That no other country can do what we do, because we are and supposedly know better than everyone else, what is actual TRUTH, what is actual HONOR, what is actual COURAGE.
That no other country can know what we know, about who must be killed, to seemingly save us all.
Basically, that intrinsically with no regard for the letter of the law, nor it's intent, no concern for human rights and INTERNATIONAL due process -- we insist that we MUST BE on the side of angels and on God's own mission, to unilaterally root out despicable heinous evil.
Who cares what the world thinks, they obviously have no idea of what really matters.
Trust us, Trust USA Empire, we really mean to save everyone -- and if we have to kill a village (or a world) to save a few 'good men' -- we will.
That we forced the underwear bomber onto a plane, to actually save that plane …
That we have the best healthcare, except when compared to any other …
That we have the best military, except … that's just about the only truth.
Because 'might makes right'
and we're the mightiest …
we must thereby be the rightiest ?
You're either 'with us against all evil,' or 'you are the evil we ALL must fight against.'
We ARE the ultimate deciders of what is right and good, because we MUST be so, in order to BE the ultimate deciders of what is right and good, … ad infinitum.
Of course -- when painted out in bright light -- this appears to be exactly what it is, unmitigated condescending presumed superiority DOGMA, dehumanizing our supposed enemies, the penultimate of hubris completely disassociated with anything real (other than perhaps greed and selfish survival).
Basically the insanity of a dying empire.
And we laugh at Nero fiddling, whilst Rome burned to the ground ?
Who's fiddling now ?
You are so on the spot, saying that "It needs Hollywood's magic to help make this illusion seem real."
But that synthesized malevolent pattern of manufactured consensus illusions, once ingested and reflected back at the world, from within far too many Americans -- is now elevated to being delusionary. Literally un-sane, if not far worse.
Isn't it about time to wake up and act like adults ?
I'd like to point out that films like this are purposely made for a very tight demographic: teenage boys. They are the ones going to the theater, paying ten bucks (plus concessions). Of course, they are also on the verge of making decisions about joining the military, which makes this even more egregious.
Unfortunately, they are also the most likely to view violence and carnage as "cool".
One would like to think that more mature, grown-up people would be making the life and death decisions, but, as usual, all you have to do is follow the money.
Tracking article for future reference
from the article:
~ While it’s true that America’s recent wars are not exactly the same as the Vietnam War, a stunning new report in Armed Forces Journal proves there are troubling similarities we could learn from. ~
troubling similarity?
yes, the US 'government' engaged in the heroin trade...
There are so many excellent comments on this thread - paperclipper, Siouxrose, Frodnonag, pjd412, Kay Johnson, Erroll, jbcracker, Bill from Saginaw, Andrea2, Averroes, johnnyred, satyrich...
Thanks, everyone. Great work.
How did the theme from the satirical 'Team America: World Police' go?
Oh yeah... "AMERICA -- FUCK YEAH!!"
That's all this piece of celluloid shite deserves.
Hey kids, after you see the movie you can download the free, official game of the U.S. Army: America's Army III.
It's like war porn for the teen set!
http://www.americasarmy.com/
"Forgetting the Past, One Military Movie at a Time"
While it's good that Sirota points out the well-known (?) system of military sponsorship of movies, he could've gone on a fair bit longer with examples of movies revisioning history with propaganda for the US rulers.
Like John Wayne's cowboy-indian movies, cementing the largely fictious "Western"-universe of savage native Americans, or his war-movies glorifying US soldiers in WWII (they never did anything nasty unjustified - e.g. firebombing Dresden killing up to 500,000 civilians was pure "necessity"), or Wayne's "vile and insane" (NYT) 1968 Vietnam war-movie "The green berets".
Like Rambo "winning" the Vietnam war. Like "Black Hawk Down" showing US soldiers in Somalia only there to gallantly "help". Like heroic Iraq war movies - a starkly illegal invasion - including the admitted fakery "Saving Jessica Lynch".
Or in a wider propaganda-vein, regarding Iran - a possible upcoming invasion - the "historic" 2007 film "300" demonizing Persians (Iranians).
That's just off the top of the head. The list of films as well as film-categories of propaganda for "Uncle Sam" could go on nearly forever.
Sirota's article is quick and fine, but should have included allusions to the much wider picture of war-propaganda in films, too. Like the growing general militaristic bent in all kinds of movies and series since 2001, when the "turbo-empire" style took off. Like real-life drama without high violence-content is out of fashion, even though images of peaceful resolutions and life-styles are more attractive to most people than ever.
There are plenty of good anti-war movies out there. You just have to find them.
As for 300? It was just comic book fluff.
"Comic book fluff" shapes tender young minds. And old ones.
"Casting active-duty SEALs, the film is ostensibly about a mission to neutralize terrorists."
Must have a lot of free time on their hands. Or were they granted time off with pay to do this? How much were they paid for their screen roles? I am thinking the studio must have been granted sole rights to them during the filming, or they couldn't be insured by the studio. Imagine the risk of one of them being killed during filming. Do we now employ more "Seals" than we have real national security work for?
Appears to me there's fat that can be cut at the Pentagon.
"Appears to me there's fat that can be cut at the Pentagon."
Start with the ten pounds or so sitting on top of every general's neck...
I do not want to hear that crap about forgetting the past or not. It doesn't make any difference if all you can ever think of to do is one war after another, spending money and killing people. You can't fix that kind of madness with no history book. you need to look around and see if you can find your soul cause you are sure as hell not acting like you got one